Nathan O. Earl*, Jeroen J. M. de Klein and Andrew S. Mehring,
{"title":"黑色和白色火灰改变温室气体排放并暂时逆转水生中生态系统的碳源-汇状态","authors":"Nathan O. Earl*, Jeroen J. M. de Klein and Andrew S. Mehring, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c1004610.1021/acs.est.4c10046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Wildfire ash is transported in large quantities to receiving water bodies, where it may exert strong chemical controls on ecosystem function. To assess the role of fire ash in altering CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes in aquatic sediments, we designed three mesocosm experiments that compared the changing fluxes of these gases and water quality parameters under different loads and types of ash. Black ash (char) caused substantial drops in pH and increased CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions through abiotic and biotic mechanisms, while white ash dramatically increased pH and enhanced CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, possibly due to inhibition of methanotrophy. White ash-driven increases in pH also instigated CO<sub>2</sub> uptake. If this abiotically driven CO<sub>2</sub> uptake could interact with ash-driven nutrient fertilization to synergistically enhance biotic CO<sub>2</sub> uptake in surface waters after a fire, these initial increases in pH may represent an important priming effect. Our findings suggest that strong ash flows following fires may trigger substantial pulses of heterotrophic or abiotically driven greenhouse gas emissions or uptake in recipient lentic aquatic ecosystems, which─although they may be overshadowed by autotrophic responses─may nonetheless be central to altered lake or wetland carbon balance following a fire.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 22","pages":"10990–11001 10990–11001"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Black and White Fire Ash Alters Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Temporarily Reverses Carbon Source-Sink Status in Aquatic Mesocosms\",\"authors\":\"Nathan O. Earl*, Jeroen J. M. de Klein and Andrew S. Mehring, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.4c1004610.1021/acs.est.4c10046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Wildfire ash is transported in large quantities to receiving water bodies, where it may exert strong chemical controls on ecosystem function. To assess the role of fire ash in altering CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes in aquatic sediments, we designed three mesocosm experiments that compared the changing fluxes of these gases and water quality parameters under different loads and types of ash. Black ash (char) caused substantial drops in pH and increased CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions through abiotic and biotic mechanisms, while white ash dramatically increased pH and enhanced CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, possibly due to inhibition of methanotrophy. White ash-driven increases in pH also instigated CO<sub>2</sub> uptake. If this abiotically driven CO<sub>2</sub> uptake could interact with ash-driven nutrient fertilization to synergistically enhance biotic CO<sub>2</sub> uptake in surface waters after a fire, these initial increases in pH may represent an important priming effect. Our findings suggest that strong ash flows following fires may trigger substantial pulses of heterotrophic or abiotically driven greenhouse gas emissions or uptake in recipient lentic aquatic ecosystems, which─although they may be overshadowed by autotrophic responses─may nonetheless be central to altered lake or wetland carbon balance following a fire.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"59 22\",\"pages\":\"10990–11001 10990–11001\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c10046\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c10046","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Black and White Fire Ash Alters Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Temporarily Reverses Carbon Source-Sink Status in Aquatic Mesocosms
Wildfire ash is transported in large quantities to receiving water bodies, where it may exert strong chemical controls on ecosystem function. To assess the role of fire ash in altering CO2 and CH4 fluxes in aquatic sediments, we designed three mesocosm experiments that compared the changing fluxes of these gases and water quality parameters under different loads and types of ash. Black ash (char) caused substantial drops in pH and increased CO2 and CH4 emissions through abiotic and biotic mechanisms, while white ash dramatically increased pH and enhanced CH4 emissions, possibly due to inhibition of methanotrophy. White ash-driven increases in pH also instigated CO2 uptake. If this abiotically driven CO2 uptake could interact with ash-driven nutrient fertilization to synergistically enhance biotic CO2 uptake in surface waters after a fire, these initial increases in pH may represent an important priming effect. Our findings suggest that strong ash flows following fires may trigger substantial pulses of heterotrophic or abiotically driven greenhouse gas emissions or uptake in recipient lentic aquatic ecosystems, which─although they may be overshadowed by autotrophic responses─may nonetheless be central to altered lake or wetland carbon balance following a fire.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences.
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.