黑色和白色火灰改变温室气体排放并暂时逆转水生中生态系统的碳源-汇状态

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Nathan O. Earl*, Jeroen J. M. de Klein and Andrew S. Mehring, 
{"title":"黑色和白色火灰改变温室气体排放并暂时逆转水生中生态系统的碳源-汇状态","authors":"Nathan O. Earl*,&nbsp;Jeroen J. M. de Klein and Andrew S. Mehring,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c1004610.1021/acs.est.4c10046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Wildfire ash is transported in large quantities to receiving water bodies, where it may exert strong chemical controls on ecosystem function. To assess the role of fire ash in altering CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes in aquatic sediments, we designed three mesocosm experiments that compared the changing fluxes of these gases and water quality parameters under different loads and types of ash. Black ash (char) caused substantial drops in pH and increased CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions through abiotic and biotic mechanisms, while white ash dramatically increased pH and enhanced CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, possibly due to inhibition of methanotrophy. White ash-driven increases in pH also instigated CO<sub>2</sub> uptake. If this abiotically driven CO<sub>2</sub> uptake could interact with ash-driven nutrient fertilization to synergistically enhance biotic CO<sub>2</sub> uptake in surface waters after a fire, these initial increases in pH may represent an important priming effect. Our findings suggest that strong ash flows following fires may trigger substantial pulses of heterotrophic or abiotically driven greenhouse gas emissions or uptake in recipient lentic aquatic ecosystems, which─although they may be overshadowed by autotrophic responses─may nonetheless be central to altered lake or wetland carbon balance following a fire.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 22","pages":"10990–11001 10990–11001"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Black and White Fire Ash Alters Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Temporarily Reverses Carbon Source-Sink Status in Aquatic Mesocosms\",\"authors\":\"Nathan O. Earl*,&nbsp;Jeroen J. M. de Klein and Andrew S. Mehring,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.4c1004610.1021/acs.est.4c10046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Wildfire ash is transported in large quantities to receiving water bodies, where it may exert strong chemical controls on ecosystem function. To assess the role of fire ash in altering CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes in aquatic sediments, we designed three mesocosm experiments that compared the changing fluxes of these gases and water quality parameters under different loads and types of ash. Black ash (char) caused substantial drops in pH and increased CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions through abiotic and biotic mechanisms, while white ash dramatically increased pH and enhanced CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, possibly due to inhibition of methanotrophy. White ash-driven increases in pH also instigated CO<sub>2</sub> uptake. If this abiotically driven CO<sub>2</sub> uptake could interact with ash-driven nutrient fertilization to synergistically enhance biotic CO<sub>2</sub> uptake in surface waters after a fire, these initial increases in pH may represent an important priming effect. Our findings suggest that strong ash flows following fires may trigger substantial pulses of heterotrophic or abiotically driven greenhouse gas emissions or uptake in recipient lentic aquatic ecosystems, which─although they may be overshadowed by autotrophic responses─may nonetheless be central to altered lake or wetland carbon balance following a fire.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"59 22\",\"pages\":\"10990–11001 10990–11001\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c10046\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c10046","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

野火灰烬大量进入接收水体,对生态系统功能产生强烈的化学控制作用。为了评估火灾灰对水生沉积物中CO2和CH4通量的影响,我们设计了三个中尺度实验,比较了不同负荷和不同灰类型下这些气体通量和水质参数的变化。黑灰通过非生物和生物机制导致pH大幅下降,CO2和CH4排放量增加,而白灰则可能通过抑制甲烷化作用导致pH显著升高,CH4排放量增加。白灰驱动的pH值增加也促进了二氧化碳的吸收。如果这种非生物驱动的二氧化碳吸收可以与灰烬驱动的养分施肥相互作用,协同增强火灾后地表水的生物二氧化碳吸收,那么这些初始pH值的增加可能代表了一个重要的启动效应。我们的研究结果表明,火灾后强烈的火山灰流可能会引发接受者水生生态系统中异养或非生物驱动的温室气体排放或吸收的大量脉冲,尽管它们可能被自养反应所掩盖,但仍然可能是火灾后湖泊或湿地碳平衡改变的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Black and White Fire Ash Alters Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Temporarily Reverses Carbon Source-Sink Status in Aquatic Mesocosms

Black and White Fire Ash Alters Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Temporarily Reverses Carbon Source-Sink Status in Aquatic Mesocosms

Wildfire ash is transported in large quantities to receiving water bodies, where it may exert strong chemical controls on ecosystem function. To assess the role of fire ash in altering CO2 and CH4 fluxes in aquatic sediments, we designed three mesocosm experiments that compared the changing fluxes of these gases and water quality parameters under different loads and types of ash. Black ash (char) caused substantial drops in pH and increased CO2 and CH4 emissions through abiotic and biotic mechanisms, while white ash dramatically increased pH and enhanced CH4 emissions, possibly due to inhibition of methanotrophy. White ash-driven increases in pH also instigated CO2 uptake. If this abiotically driven CO2 uptake could interact with ash-driven nutrient fertilization to synergistically enhance biotic CO2 uptake in surface waters after a fire, these initial increases in pH may represent an important priming effect. Our findings suggest that strong ash flows following fires may trigger substantial pulses of heterotrophic or abiotically driven greenhouse gas emissions or uptake in recipient lentic aquatic ecosystems, which─although they may be overshadowed by autotrophic responses─may nonetheless be central to altered lake or wetland carbon balance following a fire.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信