与无火森林相比,有火森林中的树木对干旱有相似的生长反应,但气孔导度更高

IF 12 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Kevin G. Willson, Matthew D. Hurteau
{"title":"与无火森林相比,有火森林中的树木对干旱有相似的生长反应,但气孔导度更高","authors":"Kevin G. Willson,&nbsp;Matthew D. Hurteau","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>In the western US, increased tree density in dry conifer forests from fire exclusion has caused tree growth declines, which is being compounded by hotter multi-year droughts. The reintroduction of frequent, low-severity wildfire reduces forest density by removing fire-intolerant trees, which can reduce competition for water and improve tree growth response to drought. We assessed how lower forest density following frequent, low-severity wildfire affected tree stomatal conductance and growth response to drought by coring and measuring competition surrounding ponderosa pines (<i>Pinus ponderosa</i>) in the Gila and Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests, New Mexico, US that either experienced 3–5 fires following long-term fire exclusion or remained fire-suppressed. We quantified tree growth declines during (resistance) and increases after (resilience) two recent multi-year droughts, which we compared between trees in fire-maintained and fire-excluded forests. We assessed stomatal conductance among trees by sampling wood from tree rings to measure stable carbon isotopes during and after both droughts, which we used to calculate evaporative water use efficiency. Trees in fire-maintained forests had greater resistance than trees in fire-excluded forests during the first drought, but growth responses became similar once the first drought ended. Interestingly, growth responses rarely varied despite evaporative water use efficiency increasing two times faster among trees in fire-excluded forests after the first drought commenced. Post-drought growth responses varied, in part, by aspect, with trees on northerly aspects exhibiting greater resilience to drought than trees on southerly aspects. Our results indicate that while trees had density-independent growth responses to drought, trees in fire-maintained forests were less water stressed than trees in fire-excluded forests. Therefore, the reintroduction of frequent, low-severity wildfire regimes has the potential to moderate some effects of hotter droughts as climate change intensifies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"31 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trees in Fire-Maintained Forests Have Similar Growth Responses to Drought, but Greater Stomatal Conductance Than Trees in Fire-Excluded Forests\",\"authors\":\"Kevin G. Willson,&nbsp;Matthew D. Hurteau\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcb.70284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>In the western US, increased tree density in dry conifer forests from fire exclusion has caused tree growth declines, which is being compounded by hotter multi-year droughts. The reintroduction of frequent, low-severity wildfire reduces forest density by removing fire-intolerant trees, which can reduce competition for water and improve tree growth response to drought. We assessed how lower forest density following frequent, low-severity wildfire affected tree stomatal conductance and growth response to drought by coring and measuring competition surrounding ponderosa pines (<i>Pinus ponderosa</i>) in the Gila and Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests, New Mexico, US that either experienced 3–5 fires following long-term fire exclusion or remained fire-suppressed. We quantified tree growth declines during (resistance) and increases after (resilience) two recent multi-year droughts, which we compared between trees in fire-maintained and fire-excluded forests. We assessed stomatal conductance among trees by sampling wood from tree rings to measure stable carbon isotopes during and after both droughts, which we used to calculate evaporative water use efficiency. Trees in fire-maintained forests had greater resistance than trees in fire-excluded forests during the first drought, but growth responses became similar once the first drought ended. Interestingly, growth responses rarely varied despite evaporative water use efficiency increasing two times faster among trees in fire-excluded forests after the first drought commenced. Post-drought growth responses varied, in part, by aspect, with trees on northerly aspects exhibiting greater resilience to drought than trees on southerly aspects. Our results indicate that while trees had density-independent growth responses to drought, trees in fire-maintained forests were less water stressed than trees in fire-excluded forests. Therefore, the reintroduction of frequent, low-severity wildfire regimes has the potential to moderate some effects of hotter droughts as climate change intensifies.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology\",\"volume\":\"31 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70284\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70284","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国西部,干旱针叶林的树木密度因防火而增加,导致树木生长下降,而多年干旱加剧了这种情况。频繁的、低严重程度的野火的重新引入通过去除不耐火的树木来降低森林密度,这可以减少对水的竞争,提高树木的生长对干旱的反应。在美国新墨西哥州的吉拉和阿帕奇-西格里夫斯国家森林中,我们通过采集和测量黄松(Pinus ponderosa)周围的竞争,评估了在频繁、低严重程度的野火后,森林密度降低如何影响树木气孔导度和对干旱的生长反应。这些黄松要么经历了3-5次火灾,要么在长期火灾排除后仍保持火灾抑制。我们量化了最近两次多年干旱期间树木生长的下降(抵抗)和(恢复)后树木生长的增加,我们比较了在防火森林和不防火森林中的树木。我们通过在两次干旱期间和之后从树木年轮中取样木材来测量稳定的碳同位素,从而评估树木的气孔导度,并使用这些碳同位素来计算蒸发水分利用效率。在第一次干旱期间,维持火灾的森林中的树木比排除火灾的森林中的树木具有更强的抵抗力,但在第一次干旱结束后,生长响应变得相似。有趣的是,尽管在第一次干旱开始后,在排除火灾的森林中,树木的蒸发水分利用效率提高了两倍,但生长响应几乎没有变化。干旱后的生长响应在一定程度上因向而异,北侧的树木比南侧的树木表现出更强的抗旱能力。我们的研究结果表明,尽管树木对干旱具有密度独立的生长响应,但与不受火灾影响的森林相比,火灾维持森林中的树木受到的水分压力更小。因此,随着气候变化加剧,重新引入频繁、低严重程度的野火有可能缓和高温干旱的某些影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Trees in Fire-Maintained Forests Have Similar Growth Responses to Drought, but Greater Stomatal Conductance Than Trees in Fire-Excluded Forests

Trees in Fire-Maintained Forests Have Similar Growth Responses to Drought, but Greater Stomatal Conductance Than Trees in Fire-Excluded Forests

In the western US, increased tree density in dry conifer forests from fire exclusion has caused tree growth declines, which is being compounded by hotter multi-year droughts. The reintroduction of frequent, low-severity wildfire reduces forest density by removing fire-intolerant trees, which can reduce competition for water and improve tree growth response to drought. We assessed how lower forest density following frequent, low-severity wildfire affected tree stomatal conductance and growth response to drought by coring and measuring competition surrounding ponderosa pines (Pinus ponderosa) in the Gila and Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests, New Mexico, US that either experienced 3–5 fires following long-term fire exclusion or remained fire-suppressed. We quantified tree growth declines during (resistance) and increases after (resilience) two recent multi-year droughts, which we compared between trees in fire-maintained and fire-excluded forests. We assessed stomatal conductance among trees by sampling wood from tree rings to measure stable carbon isotopes during and after both droughts, which we used to calculate evaporative water use efficiency. Trees in fire-maintained forests had greater resistance than trees in fire-excluded forests during the first drought, but growth responses became similar once the first drought ended. Interestingly, growth responses rarely varied despite evaporative water use efficiency increasing two times faster among trees in fire-excluded forests after the first drought commenced. Post-drought growth responses varied, in part, by aspect, with trees on northerly aspects exhibiting greater resilience to drought than trees on southerly aspects. Our results indicate that while trees had density-independent growth responses to drought, trees in fire-maintained forests were less water stressed than trees in fire-excluded forests. Therefore, the reintroduction of frequent, low-severity wildfire regimes has the potential to moderate some effects of hotter droughts as climate change intensifies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信