{"title":"温度变化与自然生境对农业生态系统节肢动物性状综合征丰度的综合影响","authors":"Jessica M. Guezen, Madhur Anand","doi":"10.1002/ecog.07815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Land‐use changes and climatic changes are two entwined stressors on ecosystems. Studies on such interactions often focus on species‐level or region‐specific responses, but fewer have examined differences in responses based on functional traits. Here we examine the influence of natural habitat cover and temperature change on the abundance of all arthropods and on the abundance of pollinator, pest and natural enemy trait syndromes (based on diet breadth, habitat breadth and dispersal mode) in arthropod communities within European agroecosystems. Using a previously compiled dataset along with historical climatic data, we found that all arthropods, diet generalist pollinators and habitat generalist pests were more abundant in sites with a high amount of natural habitat regardless of temperature changes experienced. For diet specialist pollinators, natural habitat and temperature change antagonistically influenced abundance; high amounts of natural habitat in landscapes appeared to mitigate the negative effects of increasing temperature extremes. Habitat specialist pest abundance was higher in sites that experienced greater increases in mean annual temperature, regardless of natural habitat cover. Natural enemies appeared to be more abundant in sites that experienced greater increases in temperature variation. For natural enemies that were flight‐dispersing and habitat generalists this was regardless of natural habitat cover, while for ground‐dispersing natural enemies, temperature change and high natural habitat cover appeared to benefit habitat generalists (ground beetles) and specialists (primarily spiders). Given the variability in responses we observed between different arthropods based on diet breadth, habitat specialism, dispersal ability and functional group, we conclude that functional approaches examining impacts of qualitatively different stressors can help inform future conservation actions or mitigation efforts.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined effects of temperature change and natural habitat on the abundance of arthropod trait syndromes in agroecosystems\",\"authors\":\"Jessica M. Guezen, Madhur Anand\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecog.07815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Land‐use changes and climatic changes are two entwined stressors on ecosystems. Studies on such interactions often focus on species‐level or region‐specific responses, but fewer have examined differences in responses based on functional traits. Here we examine the influence of natural habitat cover and temperature change on the abundance of all arthropods and on the abundance of pollinator, pest and natural enemy trait syndromes (based on diet breadth, habitat breadth and dispersal mode) in arthropod communities within European agroecosystems. Using a previously compiled dataset along with historical climatic data, we found that all arthropods, diet generalist pollinators and habitat generalist pests were more abundant in sites with a high amount of natural habitat regardless of temperature changes experienced. For diet specialist pollinators, natural habitat and temperature change antagonistically influenced abundance; high amounts of natural habitat in landscapes appeared to mitigate the negative effects of increasing temperature extremes. Habitat specialist pest abundance was higher in sites that experienced greater increases in mean annual temperature, regardless of natural habitat cover. Natural enemies appeared to be more abundant in sites that experienced greater increases in temperature variation. For natural enemies that were flight‐dispersing and habitat generalists this was regardless of natural habitat cover, while for ground‐dispersing natural enemies, temperature change and high natural habitat cover appeared to benefit habitat generalists (ground beetles) and specialists (primarily spiders). Given the variability in responses we observed between different arthropods based on diet breadth, habitat specialism, dispersal ability and functional group, we conclude that functional approaches examining impacts of qualitatively different stressors can help inform future conservation actions or mitigation efforts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecography\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.07815\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.07815","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Combined effects of temperature change and natural habitat on the abundance of arthropod trait syndromes in agroecosystems
Land‐use changes and climatic changes are two entwined stressors on ecosystems. Studies on such interactions often focus on species‐level or region‐specific responses, but fewer have examined differences in responses based on functional traits. Here we examine the influence of natural habitat cover and temperature change on the abundance of all arthropods and on the abundance of pollinator, pest and natural enemy trait syndromes (based on diet breadth, habitat breadth and dispersal mode) in arthropod communities within European agroecosystems. Using a previously compiled dataset along with historical climatic data, we found that all arthropods, diet generalist pollinators and habitat generalist pests were more abundant in sites with a high amount of natural habitat regardless of temperature changes experienced. For diet specialist pollinators, natural habitat and temperature change antagonistically influenced abundance; high amounts of natural habitat in landscapes appeared to mitigate the negative effects of increasing temperature extremes. Habitat specialist pest abundance was higher in sites that experienced greater increases in mean annual temperature, regardless of natural habitat cover. Natural enemies appeared to be more abundant in sites that experienced greater increases in temperature variation. For natural enemies that were flight‐dispersing and habitat generalists this was regardless of natural habitat cover, while for ground‐dispersing natural enemies, temperature change and high natural habitat cover appeared to benefit habitat generalists (ground beetles) and specialists (primarily spiders). Given the variability in responses we observed between different arthropods based on diet breadth, habitat specialism, dispersal ability and functional group, we conclude that functional approaches examining impacts of qualitatively different stressors can help inform future conservation actions or mitigation efforts.
期刊介绍:
ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem.
Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography.
Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.