Adeel Ahmad Khan, Fateen Ata, Afia Aziz, Aya Janan Qassim, Ahmed Shukri, Khaled Abdallah Aboujabal, Yazan Almohtasib, Amin Jayyousi, Mohammed Bashir, Haval Surchi
{"title":"评价胰岛素加口服药物与单独口服抗糖尿病治疗对新诊断的2型糖尿病伴高糖化血红蛋白和急性冠状动脉综合征患者的疗效","authors":"Adeel Ahmad Khan, Fateen Ata, Afia Aziz, Aya Janan Qassim, Ahmed Shukri, Khaled Abdallah Aboujabal, Yazan Almohtasib, Amin Jayyousi, Mohammed Bashir, Haval Surchi","doi":"10.1002/edm2.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Many patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) are newly diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) with very high hbA1c levels (> 10%). Early achievement of glycaemic control is of prime importance in such cases, and many guidelines recommend starting insulin together with oral anti-diabetic drugs (OAD) as part of discharge medications. However, large numbers of treatment-naïve patients are hesitant to use insulin due to various factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this retrospective, single-centre, observational study, we compared the hbA1c at 1-year follow-up between newly diagnosed DM patients with initial hbA1c > 10% who were discharged on insulin plus OAD versus those only on OAD after admission with ACS. Pairwise comparisons between continuous and categorical study variables were performed using t-test, Mann–Whitney test, and chi-square. We used STATA 18 for analysis. Baseline characteristics have been described for all the patients included in the study. In the analysis of outcomes at follow-up, only patients who had follow-up at 1-year were included.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 149 patients eligible for inclusion, the majority were males (97.3%). The mean age was 47 ± 8.3 years. The baseline hbA1c at diagnosis was 11.2 (10.5–12.3) %. 38 (25.5%) Were Discharged on insulin + OADs, whereas 111 (75.5%) Were Discharged Only on OADs. There was no statistically significant difference in change in hbA1c from baseline between the two groups (Mean (SD) 4.4% ± 1.8% vs. 4% ± 1.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.07). None of the patients had any hyperglycaemic emergency, and there were no differences in recurrent admissions due to cardiac indications (<i>p</i> = 0.5).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>An anti-DM regimen consisting of multiple oral agents is a safe and effective alternative to insulin plus OAD and can lead to a comparable reduction in hbA1c at 1-year in patients who are not willing to use insulin early after diagnosis of T2DM.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36522,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edm2.70069","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Effectiveness of Insulin Plus Oral Medications Versus Oral Anti-Diabetes Therapy Alone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes With Very High hbA1c and Acute Coronary Syndrome\",\"authors\":\"Adeel Ahmad Khan, Fateen Ata, Afia Aziz, Aya Janan Qassim, Ahmed Shukri, Khaled Abdallah Aboujabal, Yazan Almohtasib, Amin Jayyousi, Mohammed Bashir, Haval Surchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edm2.70069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Many patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) are newly diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) with very high hbA1c levels (> 10%). Early achievement of glycaemic control is of prime importance in such cases, and many guidelines recommend starting insulin together with oral anti-diabetic drugs (OAD) as part of discharge medications. However, large numbers of treatment-naïve patients are hesitant to use insulin due to various factors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this retrospective, single-centre, observational study, we compared the hbA1c at 1-year follow-up between newly diagnosed DM patients with initial hbA1c > 10% who were discharged on insulin plus OAD versus those only on OAD after admission with ACS. Pairwise comparisons between continuous and categorical study variables were performed using t-test, Mann–Whitney test, and chi-square. We used STATA 18 for analysis. Baseline characteristics have been described for all the patients included in the study. In the analysis of outcomes at follow-up, only patients who had follow-up at 1-year were included.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 149 patients eligible for inclusion, the majority were males (97.3%). The mean age was 47 ± 8.3 years. The baseline hbA1c at diagnosis was 11.2 (10.5–12.3) %. 38 (25.5%) Were Discharged on insulin + OADs, whereas 111 (75.5%) Were Discharged Only on OADs. There was no statistically significant difference in change in hbA1c from baseline between the two groups (Mean (SD) 4.4% ± 1.8% vs. 4% ± 1.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.07). None of the patients had any hyperglycaemic emergency, and there were no differences in recurrent admissions due to cardiac indications (<i>p</i> = 0.5).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>An anti-DM regimen consisting of multiple oral agents is a safe and effective alternative to insulin plus OAD and can lead to a comparable reduction in hbA1c at 1-year in patients who are not willing to use insulin early after diagnosis of T2DM.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edm2.70069\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edm2.70069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edm2.70069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Insulin Plus Oral Medications Versus Oral Anti-Diabetes Therapy Alone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes With Very High hbA1c and Acute Coronary Syndrome
Introduction
Many patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) are newly diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) with very high hbA1c levels (> 10%). Early achievement of glycaemic control is of prime importance in such cases, and many guidelines recommend starting insulin together with oral anti-diabetic drugs (OAD) as part of discharge medications. However, large numbers of treatment-naïve patients are hesitant to use insulin due to various factors.
Methods
In this retrospective, single-centre, observational study, we compared the hbA1c at 1-year follow-up between newly diagnosed DM patients with initial hbA1c > 10% who were discharged on insulin plus OAD versus those only on OAD after admission with ACS. Pairwise comparisons between continuous and categorical study variables were performed using t-test, Mann–Whitney test, and chi-square. We used STATA 18 for analysis. Baseline characteristics have been described for all the patients included in the study. In the analysis of outcomes at follow-up, only patients who had follow-up at 1-year were included.
Results
Of 149 patients eligible for inclusion, the majority were males (97.3%). The mean age was 47 ± 8.3 years. The baseline hbA1c at diagnosis was 11.2 (10.5–12.3) %. 38 (25.5%) Were Discharged on insulin + OADs, whereas 111 (75.5%) Were Discharged Only on OADs. There was no statistically significant difference in change in hbA1c from baseline between the two groups (Mean (SD) 4.4% ± 1.8% vs. 4% ± 1.5%, p = 0.07). None of the patients had any hyperglycaemic emergency, and there were no differences in recurrent admissions due to cardiac indications (p = 0.5).
Conclusion
An anti-DM regimen consisting of multiple oral agents is a safe and effective alternative to insulin plus OAD and can lead to a comparable reduction in hbA1c at 1-year in patients who are not willing to use insulin early after diagnosis of T2DM.