对“男性避孕”新方法的兴趣在美国进行了输精管切除术的人群调查。

IF 1.9 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Madeline Mahoney, Asha Hassan, Alison Ojanen-Goldsmith, Christy Boraas
{"title":"对“男性避孕”新方法的兴趣在美国进行了输精管切除术的人群调查。","authors":"Madeline Mahoney, Asha Hassan, Alison Ojanen-Goldsmith, Christy Boraas","doi":"10.1186/s40834-025-00369-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alternative contraceptive methods for sperm, often referred to as \"male contraception\" are in development. Given the lack of current contraceptive options for people who produce sperm, we sought to understand if people with vasectomies would have preferred an alternative contraceptive method, had one been available.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional online survey with 195 participants. Participants were recruited via an email list of 658 people who had received vasectomies from Planned Parenthood North Central States (PPNCS) since 2013 and were willing to be contacted for research purposes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>26.7% of participants reported that access to a different method of birth control for sperm that was highly effective, non-surgical, and fully reversible would have likely or very likely changed their decision to have a vasectomy (44.6% reported it was unlikely or very unlikely and 28.7% were neutral). Reasons for preferring alternative contraceptive methods included reversibility, the desire to avoid surgery, and the accessibility of alternative methods. Demographic findings include that 46.2% of people surveyed had no children at the time of their vasectomy and only 41% of participants were married at the time of their vasectomy. Previous literature has suggested most people undergoing vasectomies are married with children. Two main motivating factors in participants' decision to have a vasectomy were wanting to prevent future biological children and the preference of participants or their partners for vasectomy over other contraceptive methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Alternative contraceptive methods for sperm would likely or very likely be preferred by a significant proportion of people who have undergone a vasectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93956,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interest in new methods of \\\"male contraception\\\" in survey of people with a prior vasectomy in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Madeline Mahoney, Asha Hassan, Alison Ojanen-Goldsmith, Christy Boraas\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40834-025-00369-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alternative contraceptive methods for sperm, often referred to as \\\"male contraception\\\" are in development. Given the lack of current contraceptive options for people who produce sperm, we sought to understand if people with vasectomies would have preferred an alternative contraceptive method, had one been available.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional online survey with 195 participants. Participants were recruited via an email list of 658 people who had received vasectomies from Planned Parenthood North Central States (PPNCS) since 2013 and were willing to be contacted for research purposes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>26.7% of participants reported that access to a different method of birth control for sperm that was highly effective, non-surgical, and fully reversible would have likely or very likely changed their decision to have a vasectomy (44.6% reported it was unlikely or very unlikely and 28.7% were neutral). Reasons for preferring alternative contraceptive methods included reversibility, the desire to avoid surgery, and the accessibility of alternative methods. Demographic findings include that 46.2% of people surveyed had no children at the time of their vasectomy and only 41% of participants were married at the time of their vasectomy. Previous literature has suggested most people undergoing vasectomies are married with children. Two main motivating factors in participants' decision to have a vasectomy were wanting to prevent future biological children and the preference of participants or their partners for vasectomy over other contraceptive methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Alternative contraceptive methods for sperm would likely or very likely be preferred by a significant proportion of people who have undergone a vasectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception and reproductive medicine\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142879/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception and reproductive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-025-00369-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-025-00369-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:精子的替代避孕方法,通常被称为“男性避孕”,正在发展中。鉴于目前对产生精子的人缺乏避孕选择,我们试图了解输精管切除术的人是否会更喜欢其他避孕方法,如果有的话。方法:我们对195名参与者进行了横断面在线调查。参与者是通过一份包含658人的电子邮件列表招募的,这些人自2013年以来接受了中北部计划生育州(PPNCS)的输精管切除术,并愿意为研究目的联系他们。结果:26.7%的参与者报告说,获得一种有效的、非手术的、完全可逆的精子控制方法可能或很可能改变他们进行输精管结扎的决定(44.6%的人报告不太可能或非常不可能,28.7%的人表示中立)。选择替代避孕方法的原因包括可逆性、避免手术的愿望和替代方法的可及性。人口统计结果包括46.2%的受访者在输精管结扎时没有孩子,只有41%的参与者在输精管结扎时已婚。以前的文献表明,大多数接受输精管切除术的人都是已婚有孩子的人。参与者决定进行输精管结扎术的两个主要激励因素是想要防止未来的亲生子女,以及参与者或其伴侣对输精管结扎术的偏好超过其他避孕方法。结论:精子的替代避孕方法很可能或很可能是接受输精管切除术的很大一部分人的首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interest in new methods of "male contraception" in survey of people with a prior vasectomy in the United States.

Background: Alternative contraceptive methods for sperm, often referred to as "male contraception" are in development. Given the lack of current contraceptive options for people who produce sperm, we sought to understand if people with vasectomies would have preferred an alternative contraceptive method, had one been available.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey with 195 participants. Participants were recruited via an email list of 658 people who had received vasectomies from Planned Parenthood North Central States (PPNCS) since 2013 and were willing to be contacted for research purposes.

Results: 26.7% of participants reported that access to a different method of birth control for sperm that was highly effective, non-surgical, and fully reversible would have likely or very likely changed their decision to have a vasectomy (44.6% reported it was unlikely or very unlikely and 28.7% were neutral). Reasons for preferring alternative contraceptive methods included reversibility, the desire to avoid surgery, and the accessibility of alternative methods. Demographic findings include that 46.2% of people surveyed had no children at the time of their vasectomy and only 41% of participants were married at the time of their vasectomy. Previous literature has suggested most people undergoing vasectomies are married with children. Two main motivating factors in participants' decision to have a vasectomy were wanting to prevent future biological children and the preference of participants or their partners for vasectomy over other contraceptive methods.

Conclusions: Alternative contraceptive methods for sperm would likely or very likely be preferred by a significant proportion of people who have undergone a vasectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信