卒中后疲劳管理在线小组教育项目的经验:一项定性描述性焦点小组研究。

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Sulekha Devaki De Silva, Kirsten van Kessel, Anjali Bhatia, Suzanne Barker-Collo, Rita Krishnamurthi, Valery Feigin, Braden Te Ao, Kelly Jones
{"title":"卒中后疲劳管理在线小组教育项目的经验:一项定性描述性焦点小组研究。","authors":"Sulekha Devaki De Silva, Kirsten van Kessel, Anjali Bhatia, Suzanne Barker-Collo, Rita Krishnamurthi, Valery Feigin, Braden Te Ao, Kelly Jones","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2025.2512204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-stroke fatigue (PSF) is a common symptom after stroke, without proven effective treatment. The Fatigue After STroke Educational Recovery (FASTER) randomized control trial evaluated a group-based, educational Fatigue Management Group (FMG) intervention. The current study explored the experiences of stroke patients, informal caregivers, and therapists when the FMG was delivered online (due to the COVID-19 pandemic). Participants included newly recruited adults (<i>n</i> = 6) with clinically significant fatigue (3-24 months post-stroke), their informal caregivers (<i>n</i> = 6), who attended as observers, and three therapists from the FASTER main trial. Separate online focus groups were conducted with each group, recorded, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Four key themes emerged: positive experiences of group membership, gaining understanding and strategies, navigating challenges in online setting, and future directions. Participants acknowledged the intervention for its educational value, normalization, cohesion, and emotional support, and appreciated new understanding of PSF. However, they also encountered challenges, including technological issues, difficulties concentrating, and therapists' struggles in addressing diverse participant needs and fatigue levels within time constraints. Suggested improvements to the intervention included extending its duration and including combinations of online and in-person sessions. Findings highlighted the importance of qualitatively examining intervention experiences in future trials for better optimization and effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences of an online version of a group education programme for the management of post-stroke fatigue: A qualitative descriptive focus group study.\",\"authors\":\"Sulekha Devaki De Silva, Kirsten van Kessel, Anjali Bhatia, Suzanne Barker-Collo, Rita Krishnamurthi, Valery Feigin, Braden Te Ao, Kelly Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09602011.2025.2512204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Post-stroke fatigue (PSF) is a common symptom after stroke, without proven effective treatment. The Fatigue After STroke Educational Recovery (FASTER) randomized control trial evaluated a group-based, educational Fatigue Management Group (FMG) intervention. The current study explored the experiences of stroke patients, informal caregivers, and therapists when the FMG was delivered online (due to the COVID-19 pandemic). Participants included newly recruited adults (<i>n</i> = 6) with clinically significant fatigue (3-24 months post-stroke), their informal caregivers (<i>n</i> = 6), who attended as observers, and three therapists from the FASTER main trial. Separate online focus groups were conducted with each group, recorded, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Four key themes emerged: positive experiences of group membership, gaining understanding and strategies, navigating challenges in online setting, and future directions. Participants acknowledged the intervention for its educational value, normalization, cohesion, and emotional support, and appreciated new understanding of PSF. However, they also encountered challenges, including technological issues, difficulties concentrating, and therapists' struggles in addressing diverse participant needs and fatigue levels within time constraints. Suggested improvements to the intervention included extending its duration and including combinations of online and in-person sessions. Findings highlighted the importance of qualitatively examining intervention experiences in future trials for better optimization and effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2025.2512204\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2025.2512204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卒中后疲劳(PSF)是卒中后的常见症状,目前尚无有效的治疗方法。卒中后疲劳教育恢复(FASTER)随机对照试验评估了一种基于组的教育疲劳管理组(FMG)干预。目前的研究探讨了在线提供FMG(由于COVID-19大流行)时中风患者、非正式护理人员和治疗师的经历。参与者包括新招募的具有临床显著疲劳(中风后3-24个月)的成年人(n = 6),他们的非正式护理人员(n = 6),他们作为观察员参加,以及来自FASTER主要试验的三名治疗师。对每个小组进行单独的在线焦点小组,记录并使用归纳主题分析进行分析。出现了四个关键主题:组成员的积极体验、获得理解和策略、应对在线环境中的挑战以及未来方向。参与者认可干预的教育价值、规范化、凝聚力和情感支持,并赞赏对PSF的新理解。然而,他们也遇到了挑战,包括技术问题、注意力难以集中、治疗师难以在时间限制内满足不同参与者的需求和疲劳程度。建议对干预措施进行改进,包括延长其持续时间,并将在线和面对面的会议结合起来。研究结果强调了在未来的试验中对干预经验进行定性检查的重要性,以获得更好的优化和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experiences of an online version of a group education programme for the management of post-stroke fatigue: A qualitative descriptive focus group study.

Post-stroke fatigue (PSF) is a common symptom after stroke, without proven effective treatment. The Fatigue After STroke Educational Recovery (FASTER) randomized control trial evaluated a group-based, educational Fatigue Management Group (FMG) intervention. The current study explored the experiences of stroke patients, informal caregivers, and therapists when the FMG was delivered online (due to the COVID-19 pandemic). Participants included newly recruited adults (n = 6) with clinically significant fatigue (3-24 months post-stroke), their informal caregivers (n = 6), who attended as observers, and three therapists from the FASTER main trial. Separate online focus groups were conducted with each group, recorded, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Four key themes emerged: positive experiences of group membership, gaining understanding and strategies, navigating challenges in online setting, and future directions. Participants acknowledged the intervention for its educational value, normalization, cohesion, and emotional support, and appreciated new understanding of PSF. However, they also encountered challenges, including technological issues, difficulties concentrating, and therapists' struggles in addressing diverse participant needs and fatigue levels within time constraints. Suggested improvements to the intervention included extending its duration and including combinations of online and in-person sessions. Findings highlighted the importance of qualitatively examining intervention experiences in future trials for better optimization and effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信