Patricia K Thomas, Eugene Ablordeppey, Grace Liverett, Olivia Rutherford, Tyler Roy, Philip Brown, F Scott Gayzik
{"title":"在代表呼吸循环的压力下,绵羊肺实质的物质特性。","authors":"Patricia K Thomas, Eugene Ablordeppey, Grace Liverett, Olivia Rutherford, Tyler Roy, Philip Brown, F Scott Gayzik","doi":"10.1115/1.4068872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung tissue behavior at different physiological pressures has not been well studied. The objectives of this study therefore were to characterize lung tissue at different physiologically relevant pressures within the breathing cycle, quantifying how the tissue deforms, and determining associated shear moduli. We utilized fresh ovine lungs harvested and tested within 8 hours of sacrifice, using spherical indentation and digital image correlation (DIC). Tests were conducted at three different pressures - 0, 4, and 10 cmH2O. Lungs from a total of ten animals were tested. The resulting instantaneous shear modulus, relaxed shear modulus, and shear modulus ratio were used for statistical analyses, via a mixed effect model. The instantaneous shear modulus had trending differences between pressures (0.05 < p < 0.1), however, the relaxed shear modulus did not (p > 0.1). The modulus ratio was considered significantly different, as p < 0.05. When comparing pressurized (4 and 10 cm H20 together) to non-pressurized, both instantaneous and relaxed shear moduli were significantly lower than the ambient pressure state.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Material characterization of ovine lung parenchyma at pressures representing the breathing cycle.\",\"authors\":\"Patricia K Thomas, Eugene Ablordeppey, Grace Liverett, Olivia Rutherford, Tyler Roy, Philip Brown, F Scott Gayzik\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4068872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lung tissue behavior at different physiological pressures has not been well studied. The objectives of this study therefore were to characterize lung tissue at different physiologically relevant pressures within the breathing cycle, quantifying how the tissue deforms, and determining associated shear moduli. We utilized fresh ovine lungs harvested and tested within 8 hours of sacrifice, using spherical indentation and digital image correlation (DIC). Tests were conducted at three different pressures - 0, 4, and 10 cmH2O. Lungs from a total of ten animals were tested. The resulting instantaneous shear modulus, relaxed shear modulus, and shear modulus ratio were used for statistical analyses, via a mixed effect model. The instantaneous shear modulus had trending differences between pressures (0.05 < p < 0.1), however, the relaxed shear modulus did not (p > 0.1). The modulus ratio was considered significantly different, as p < 0.05. When comparing pressurized (4 and 10 cm H20 together) to non-pressurized, both instantaneous and relaxed shear moduli were significantly lower than the ambient pressure state.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068872\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068872","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
肺组织在不同生理压力下的行为尚未得到很好的研究。因此,本研究的目的是表征呼吸周期内不同生理相关压力下的肺组织,量化组织如何变形,并确定相关的剪切模量。我们利用宰杀后8小时内采集并测试的新鲜羊肺,采用球形压痕和数字图像相关(DIC)技术。测试在三种不同的压力下进行——0、4和10 cmH2O。总共对10只动物的肺进行了测试。得到的瞬时剪切模量、松弛剪切模量和剪切模量比通过混合效应模型进行统计分析。瞬时剪切模量在不同压力下有趋势差异(0.05 < p < 0.1),而松弛剪切模量无趋势差异(p < 0.01)。模比差异有统计学意义,p < 0.05。将加压状态(4 cm和10 cm h2o一起)与非加压状态进行比较,瞬时剪切模量和松弛剪切模量均显著低于环境压力状态。
Material characterization of ovine lung parenchyma at pressures representing the breathing cycle.
Lung tissue behavior at different physiological pressures has not been well studied. The objectives of this study therefore were to characterize lung tissue at different physiologically relevant pressures within the breathing cycle, quantifying how the tissue deforms, and determining associated shear moduli. We utilized fresh ovine lungs harvested and tested within 8 hours of sacrifice, using spherical indentation and digital image correlation (DIC). Tests were conducted at three different pressures - 0, 4, and 10 cmH2O. Lungs from a total of ten animals were tested. The resulting instantaneous shear modulus, relaxed shear modulus, and shear modulus ratio were used for statistical analyses, via a mixed effect model. The instantaneous shear modulus had trending differences between pressures (0.05 < p < 0.1), however, the relaxed shear modulus did not (p > 0.1). The modulus ratio was considered significantly different, as p < 0.05. When comparing pressurized (4 and 10 cm H20 together) to non-pressurized, both instantaneous and relaxed shear moduli were significantly lower than the ambient pressure state.
期刊介绍:
Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.