sacadometry测验的重测信度评价。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Aysenur Kucuk Ceyhan, Asya Fatma Men
{"title":"sacadometry测验的重测信度评价。","authors":"Aysenur Kucuk Ceyhan, Asya Fatma Men","doi":"10.3766/jaaa.240046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Saccadometry is an advanced ocular motor test that allows functional assessment of the various brain regions and circuits involved in the generation of accurate saccadic eye movements. Recently, some manufacturers have included the saccadometry test in the videonystagmography (VNG) test battery. This study aimed to evaluate the test&#8211;retest reliability of the saccadometry test, which is part of the VNG test battery.<b>Methods:</b> Thirty-five healthy participants (mean age &#177; standard deviation&#8201;=&#8201;24.66 &#177; 4.4 years; 26 female and 9 male participants) 18&#8211;30&#8201;years of age were included in this study. Each participant underwent the saccadometry test twice, 1 week apart, by the same experienced clinician. To determine test&#8211;retest reliability, paired <i>t</i> tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were conducted to compare the means of two measures, and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to reflect the degree of correlation between measures.<b>Results:</b> Statistically significant differences were not observed when the first test&#8211;retest measures of latency, velocity, accuracy, and directional error rate were compared (p &#62; 0.05). For prosaccades, intraclass correlation coefficient values of test&#8211;retest reliability between the first test and retest means were 0.707 for latency, 0.488 for velocity, 0.594 for accuracy, and &#8722;0.248 for directional error. For antisaccades, these values were 0.813 for latency, 0.48 for accuracy, 0.808 for velocity, and 0.807 for directional error.<b>Conclusion:</b> Saccadometry provides acceptable levels of test&#8211;retest reliability for both antisaccades and prosaccades. Test&#8211;retest reliability varied from poor to good for latency, velocity, accuracy, and directional error.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evaluation of Test-Retest Reliability of the Saccadometry Test.\",\"authors\":\"Aysenur Kucuk Ceyhan, Asya Fatma Men\",\"doi\":\"10.3766/jaaa.240046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Saccadometry is an advanced ocular motor test that allows functional assessment of the various brain regions and circuits involved in the generation of accurate saccadic eye movements. Recently, some manufacturers have included the saccadometry test in the videonystagmography (VNG) test battery. This study aimed to evaluate the test&#8211;retest reliability of the saccadometry test, which is part of the VNG test battery.<b>Methods:</b> Thirty-five healthy participants (mean age &#177; standard deviation&#8201;=&#8201;24.66 &#177; 4.4 years; 26 female and 9 male participants) 18&#8211;30&#8201;years of age were included in this study. Each participant underwent the saccadometry test twice, 1 week apart, by the same experienced clinician. To determine test&#8211;retest reliability, paired <i>t</i> tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were conducted to compare the means of two measures, and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to reflect the degree of correlation between measures.<b>Results:</b> Statistically significant differences were not observed when the first test&#8211;retest measures of latency, velocity, accuracy, and directional error rate were compared (p &#62; 0.05). For prosaccades, intraclass correlation coefficient values of test&#8211;retest reliability between the first test and retest means were 0.707 for latency, 0.488 for velocity, 0.594 for accuracy, and &#8722;0.248 for directional error. For antisaccades, these values were 0.813 for latency, 0.48 for accuracy, 0.808 for velocity, and 0.807 for directional error.<b>Conclusion:</b> Saccadometry provides acceptable levels of test&#8211;retest reliability for both antisaccades and prosaccades. Test&#8211;retest reliability varied from poor to good for latency, velocity, accuracy, and directional error.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.240046\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.240046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:眼动测量是一种先进的眼运动测试,可以评估与准确眼动产生有关的不同脑区和脑回路的功能。最近,一些制造商在视频震动图(VNG)测试电池中加入了眼球测量测试。本研究旨在评估作为VNG测试组一部分的测量测量测试的重测信度。方法:35名健康参与者(平均年龄±;标准差 ;= 24.66;4.4年;本研究包括26名女性和9名男性参与者)18–30 ;岁。每位参与者接受了两次,间隔1周,由同一经验丰富的临床医生。为确定重测信度,采用配对t检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较两个测量值的均值,并采用类内相关系数反映测量值之间的相关程度。结果:比较第一次测试–;复测的潜伏期、速度、准确性和方向错误率时,未观察到统计学上的显著差异(p >;0.05)。对于前体,第一次测试与重测均值的重测信度的类内相关系数值潜伏期为0.707,速度为0.488,准确度为0.594,方向误差为0.248。对于反扫视,这些值为延迟0.813,精度0.48,速度0.808,方向误差0.807。结论:眼跳测定法对反眼跳和亲眼跳均提供了可接受的重测信度。对于延迟、速度、准确性和方向误差,重测可靠性从差到好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Evaluation of Test-Retest Reliability of the Saccadometry Test.

Purpose: Saccadometry is an advanced ocular motor test that allows functional assessment of the various brain regions and circuits involved in the generation of accurate saccadic eye movements. Recently, some manufacturers have included the saccadometry test in the videonystagmography (VNG) test battery. This study aimed to evaluate the test–retest reliability of the saccadometry test, which is part of the VNG test battery.Methods: Thirty-five healthy participants (mean age ± standard deviation = 24.66 ± 4.4 years; 26 female and 9 male participants) 18–30 years of age were included in this study. Each participant underwent the saccadometry test twice, 1 week apart, by the same experienced clinician. To determine test–retest reliability, paired t tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were conducted to compare the means of two measures, and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to reflect the degree of correlation between measures.Results: Statistically significant differences were not observed when the first test–retest measures of latency, velocity, accuracy, and directional error rate were compared (p > 0.05). For prosaccades, intraclass correlation coefficient values of test–retest reliability between the first test and retest means were 0.707 for latency, 0.488 for velocity, 0.594 for accuracy, and −0.248 for directional error. For antisaccades, these values were 0.813 for latency, 0.48 for accuracy, 0.808 for velocity, and 0.807 for directional error.Conclusion: Saccadometry provides acceptable levels of test–retest reliability for both antisaccades and prosaccades. Test–retest reliability varied from poor to good for latency, velocity, accuracy, and directional error.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信