大剂量雌激素和孕激素序贯辅助宫腔镜冷刀分离与单独宫腔镜冷刀分离治疗严重宫腔粘连所致不孕症或闭经的疗效回顾性队列研究

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Xuke Wang, Jing Han, Yun Song
{"title":"大剂量雌激素和孕激素序贯辅助宫腔镜冷刀分离与单独宫腔镜冷刀分离治疗严重宫腔粘连所致不孕症或闭经的疗效回顾性队列研究","authors":"Xuke Wang, Jing Han, Yun Song","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-02964-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To investigate the effect of high-dose estrogen and progesterone sequential assisted hysteroscopic cold knife separation surgery on the recovery of uterine cavity morphology in patients with severe intrauterine adhesions (IUA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study. A total of 200 patients with severe IUA were selected as the research objects, and the selected period was from August 2020 to August 2023. According to different treatment methods, patients were divided into the surgical group (hysteroscopic cold knife separation surgery, n = 82) and the combined group (high-dose estrogen and progesterone sequential assisted hysteroscopic cold knife separation surgery, n = 118). The clinical effects and menstrual blood loss map (PBAC) scores were compared between the two groups. The uterine cavity shape recovery was observed before treatment and 2 months after treatment. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with 79.27% in the surgical group, the effective rate of the combined group was 94.07%, which was higher (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.035, P = 0.002). PBAC score in the combined group was significantly lower than that in the surgical group (t = 4.594, P < 0.001). After intervention, the intimal thickness, intimal volume and volume of the combined group were higher than the surgical group (t = 7.608, P < 0.001;t = 8.044, P < 0.001; t = 11.372, P < 0.001). The re-adhesion rate of the combined group was 11.02%, which was significantly lower than 29.27% of the surgical group (χ<sup>2</sup> = 10.689, P = 0.002). Compared with 6.10% and 89.02% of pregnancy rate and satisfaction rate in the surgical group, the pregnancy rate was 20.34% and the satisfaction rate was 97.46% in the combined group, which were significantly higher (χ<sup>2</sup> = 7.915, P = 0.005; χ<sup>2</sup> = 6.101, P = 0.014). Postoperative amenorrhea (OR = 1.970, 95%CI: 1.278-3.037), number of miscarriages (OR = 1.775, 95%CI: 1.344-2.344), standardized use of estrogen (OR = 1.519, 95%CI: 1.119-2.063), number of intrauterine operations (OR = 1.766, 95%CI: 1.162-2.686), and placement of balloons (OR = 3.264, 95%CI: 1.788-5.960) were independent risk factors for recurrence of IUA after treatment (P < 0.05). Besides, combination therapy (OR = 0.454, 95%CI: 0.283-0.730) was a protective factor (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the treatment of severe IUA, high-dose estrogen and progesterone sequential assisted hysteroscopic cold knife separation surgery can promote the recovery of uterine cavity morphology, reduce the incidence of postoperative IUA, and improve the postoperative pregnancy rate of patients. This was a retrospective study with limitations such as single sample and short follow-up time. Prospective studies with extended follow-up are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"246"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12139059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of high-dose estrogen and progesterone sequential assisted hysteroscopic cold knife separation versus hysteroscopic cold knife separation alone in the treatment of infertility or amenorrhea caused by severe intrauterine adhesion: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Xuke Wang, Jing Han, Yun Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12893-025-02964-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To investigate the effect of high-dose estrogen and progesterone sequential assisted hysteroscopic cold knife separation surgery on the recovery of uterine cavity morphology in patients with severe intrauterine adhesions (IUA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study. A total of 200 patients with severe IUA were selected as the research objects, and the selected period was from August 2020 to August 2023. According to different treatment methods, patients were divided into the surgical group (hysteroscopic cold knife separation surgery, n = 82) and the combined group (high-dose estrogen and progesterone sequential assisted hysteroscopic cold knife separation surgery, n = 118). The clinical effects and menstrual blood loss map (PBAC) scores were compared between the two groups. The uterine cavity shape recovery was observed before treatment and 2 months after treatment. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with 79.27% in the surgical group, the effective rate of the combined group was 94.07%, which was higher (χ<sup>2</sup> = 0.035, P = 0.002). PBAC score in the combined group was significantly lower than that in the surgical group (t = 4.594, P < 0.001). After intervention, the intimal thickness, intimal volume and volume of the combined group were higher than the surgical group (t = 7.608, P < 0.001;t = 8.044, P < 0.001; t = 11.372, P < 0.001). The re-adhesion rate of the combined group was 11.02%, which was significantly lower than 29.27% of the surgical group (χ<sup>2</sup> = 10.689, P = 0.002). Compared with 6.10% and 89.02% of pregnancy rate and satisfaction rate in the surgical group, the pregnancy rate was 20.34% and the satisfaction rate was 97.46% in the combined group, which were significantly higher (χ<sup>2</sup> = 7.915, P = 0.005; χ<sup>2</sup> = 6.101, P = 0.014). Postoperative amenorrhea (OR = 1.970, 95%CI: 1.278-3.037), number of miscarriages (OR = 1.775, 95%CI: 1.344-2.344), standardized use of estrogen (OR = 1.519, 95%CI: 1.119-2.063), number of intrauterine operations (OR = 1.766, 95%CI: 1.162-2.686), and placement of balloons (OR = 3.264, 95%CI: 1.788-5.960) were independent risk factors for recurrence of IUA after treatment (P < 0.05). Besides, combination therapy (OR = 0.454, 95%CI: 0.283-0.730) was a protective factor (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the treatment of severe IUA, high-dose estrogen and progesterone sequential assisted hysteroscopic cold knife separation surgery can promote the recovery of uterine cavity morphology, reduce the incidence of postoperative IUA, and improve the postoperative pregnancy rate of patients. This was a retrospective study with limitations such as single sample and short follow-up time. Prospective studies with extended follow-up are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12139059/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02964-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02964-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:探讨大剂量雌激素和黄体酮序贯辅助宫腔镜冷刀分离术对重度宫腔粘连(IUA)患者宫腔形态恢复的影响。方法:回顾性队列研究。选取200例重度IUA患者作为研究对象,选取时间为2020年8月至2023年8月。根据治疗方法的不同,将患者分为手术组(宫腔镜冷刀分离手术,n = 82)和联合组(大剂量雌激素和孕激素序贯辅助宫腔镜冷刀分离手术,n = 118)。比较两组患者的临床疗效及月经失血量图(PBAC)评分。观察治疗前及治疗后2个月子宫腔形态恢复情况。采用多因素Logistic回归分析影响因素。结果:联合治疗组有效率为94.07%,高于单纯手术组79.27% (χ2 = 0.035, P = 0.002)。联合组PBAC评分明显低于手术组(t = 4.594, P = 10.689, P = 0.002)。单纯手术组妊娠率和满意率分别为6.10%和89.02%,联合手术组妊娠率和满意率分别为20.34%和97.46%,差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 7.915, P = 0.005;χ2 = 6.101, p = 0.014)。术后闭经(OR = 1.970, 95%CI: 1.278 ~ 3.037)、流产次数(OR = 1.775, 95%CI: 1.344 ~ 2.344)、雌激素规范化使用(OR = 1.519, 95%CI: 1.119 ~ 2.063)、宫内手术次数(OR = 1.766, 95%CI: 1.164 ~ 2.686)、气囊放置(OR = 3.264, 95%CI: 1.788 ~ 5.960)是IUA治疗后复发的独立危险因素(P在重度IUA的治疗中,大剂量雌激素与孕激素序贯辅助宫腔镜冷刀分离手术可促进宫腔形态的恢复,降低术后IUA的发生率,提高患者术后妊娠率。本研究为回顾性研究,存在样本单一、随访时间短等局限性。需要长期随访的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of high-dose estrogen and progesterone sequential assisted hysteroscopic cold knife separation versus hysteroscopic cold knife separation alone in the treatment of infertility or amenorrhea caused by severe intrauterine adhesion: a retrospective cohort study.

Introduction: To investigate the effect of high-dose estrogen and progesterone sequential assisted hysteroscopic cold knife separation surgery on the recovery of uterine cavity morphology in patients with severe intrauterine adhesions (IUA).

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. A total of 200 patients with severe IUA were selected as the research objects, and the selected period was from August 2020 to August 2023. According to different treatment methods, patients were divided into the surgical group (hysteroscopic cold knife separation surgery, n = 82) and the combined group (high-dose estrogen and progesterone sequential assisted hysteroscopic cold knife separation surgery, n = 118). The clinical effects and menstrual blood loss map (PBAC) scores were compared between the two groups. The uterine cavity shape recovery was observed before treatment and 2 months after treatment. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors.

Results: Compared with 79.27% in the surgical group, the effective rate of the combined group was 94.07%, which was higher (χ2 = 0.035, P = 0.002). PBAC score in the combined group was significantly lower than that in the surgical group (t = 4.594, P < 0.001). After intervention, the intimal thickness, intimal volume and volume of the combined group were higher than the surgical group (t = 7.608, P < 0.001;t = 8.044, P < 0.001; t = 11.372, P < 0.001). The re-adhesion rate of the combined group was 11.02%, which was significantly lower than 29.27% of the surgical group (χ2 = 10.689, P = 0.002). Compared with 6.10% and 89.02% of pregnancy rate and satisfaction rate in the surgical group, the pregnancy rate was 20.34% and the satisfaction rate was 97.46% in the combined group, which were significantly higher (χ2 = 7.915, P = 0.005; χ2 = 6.101, P = 0.014). Postoperative amenorrhea (OR = 1.970, 95%CI: 1.278-3.037), number of miscarriages (OR = 1.775, 95%CI: 1.344-2.344), standardized use of estrogen (OR = 1.519, 95%CI: 1.119-2.063), number of intrauterine operations (OR = 1.766, 95%CI: 1.162-2.686), and placement of balloons (OR = 3.264, 95%CI: 1.788-5.960) were independent risk factors for recurrence of IUA after treatment (P < 0.05). Besides, combination therapy (OR = 0.454, 95%CI: 0.283-0.730) was a protective factor (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: In the treatment of severe IUA, high-dose estrogen and progesterone sequential assisted hysteroscopic cold knife separation surgery can promote the recovery of uterine cavity morphology, reduce the incidence of postoperative IUA, and improve the postoperative pregnancy rate of patients. This was a retrospective study with limitations such as single sample and short follow-up time. Prospective studies with extended follow-up are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信