在社会人口决定因素的背景下对代孕的态度:一项横断面研究。

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Karolina Lutkiewicz, Łucja Bieleninik, Paweł Jurek, Mariola Bidzan
{"title":"在社会人口决定因素的背景下对代孕的态度:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Karolina Lutkiewicz, Łucja Bieleninik, Paweł Jurek, Mariola Bidzan","doi":"10.1080/02646838.2025.2513662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims/background: </strong>This study aims to explore socio-demographic factors and surrogacy attitudes. Surrogacy, an assisted reproductive technology, enables parenthood for individuals unable to conceive or carry a child. It intersects with societal norms, ethical considerations, personal beliefs, and professional contexts, shaping varied attitudes towards it.</p><p><strong>Design/methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, data was collected using a community sampling through virtual surveys: Attitudes Towards Surrogacy Scale (ATSS) and Attitudes to Surrogate Parenthood Questionnaire (ASPQ). Participants consisted of 569 individuals, with the majority being women (<i>n</i> = 470, 82%). Correlations and predictors of attitudes towards surrogacy were investigated using statistical methods. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyse place of residence, parenthood and relationship status and multiple regression models were used to explain attitudes towards surrogacy (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04732559).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Surrogacy Ethical Context strongly correlates with both Acceptance of Surrogacy and Financing and Legalizing Surrogacy. Socio-demographic factors collectively explain between 6% and 18% of the variance in attitudes towards different aspects of surrogacy. Sexual orientation and religion were the strongest predictors of the attitudes towards surrogacy. Individuals who view surrogacy more positively in terms of ethics and legal considerations reflected fewer cognitive concerns regarding both types of surrogacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings show societal trends in acceptance and apprehension towards surrogacy, offering insights relevant for policymakers, healthcare providers, and advocacy groups involved in reproductive rights and technologies. These findings highlight the importance of considering socio-demographic diversity when analysing attitudes towards surrogacy, highlighting distinct patterns of acceptance and concern across different demographic groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":47721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes towards surrogacy in the context of socio-demographic determinants: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Karolina Lutkiewicz, Łucja Bieleninik, Paweł Jurek, Mariola Bidzan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02646838.2025.2513662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims/background: </strong>This study aims to explore socio-demographic factors and surrogacy attitudes. Surrogacy, an assisted reproductive technology, enables parenthood for individuals unable to conceive or carry a child. It intersects with societal norms, ethical considerations, personal beliefs, and professional contexts, shaping varied attitudes towards it.</p><p><strong>Design/methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, data was collected using a community sampling through virtual surveys: Attitudes Towards Surrogacy Scale (ATSS) and Attitudes to Surrogate Parenthood Questionnaire (ASPQ). Participants consisted of 569 individuals, with the majority being women (<i>n</i> = 470, 82%). Correlations and predictors of attitudes towards surrogacy were investigated using statistical methods. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyse place of residence, parenthood and relationship status and multiple regression models were used to explain attitudes towards surrogacy (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04732559).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Surrogacy Ethical Context strongly correlates with both Acceptance of Surrogacy and Financing and Legalizing Surrogacy. Socio-demographic factors collectively explain between 6% and 18% of the variance in attitudes towards different aspects of surrogacy. Sexual orientation and religion were the strongest predictors of the attitudes towards surrogacy. Individuals who view surrogacy more positively in terms of ethics and legal considerations reflected fewer cognitive concerns regarding both types of surrogacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings show societal trends in acceptance and apprehension towards surrogacy, offering insights relevant for policymakers, healthcare providers, and advocacy groups involved in reproductive rights and technologies. These findings highlight the importance of considering socio-demographic diversity when analysing attitudes towards surrogacy, highlighting distinct patterns of acceptance and concern across different demographic groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2025.2513662\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2025.2513662","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的/背景:本研究旨在探讨社会人口因素与代孕态度的关系。代孕是一种辅助生殖技术,使无法怀孕或生育孩子的人成为父母。它与社会规范、道德考虑、个人信仰和专业背景交叉,形成了对它的不同态度。设计/方法:在本横断面研究中,数据收集采用社区抽样,通过虚拟调查:对代孕态度量表(ATSS)和对代孕父母态度问卷(ASPQ)。参与者包括569人,其中大多数是女性(n = 470,82%)。使用统计学方法调查了对代孕态度的相关性和预测因素。采用方差分析(ANOVA)分析居住地、父母关系和关系状况,采用多元回归模型解释对代孕的态度(ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04732559)。结果:代孕伦理背景与代孕接受程度、代孕融资和代孕合法化密切相关。社会人口因素共同解释了对代孕不同方面态度差异的6%至18%。性取向和宗教信仰是对代孕态度的最强预测因子。在道德和法律方面更积极地看待代孕的个体反映出对这两种代孕类型的认知担忧较少。结论:研究结果显示了对代孕的接受和担忧的社会趋势,为政策制定者、医疗保健提供者和涉及生殖权利和技术的倡导团体提供了相关见解。这些发现强调了在分析对代孕的态度时考虑社会人口多样性的重要性,强调了不同人口群体对代孕的接受和关注的不同模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attitudes towards surrogacy in the context of socio-demographic determinants: a cross-sectional study.

Aims/background: This study aims to explore socio-demographic factors and surrogacy attitudes. Surrogacy, an assisted reproductive technology, enables parenthood for individuals unable to conceive or carry a child. It intersects with societal norms, ethical considerations, personal beliefs, and professional contexts, shaping varied attitudes towards it.

Design/methods: In this cross-sectional study, data was collected using a community sampling through virtual surveys: Attitudes Towards Surrogacy Scale (ATSS) and Attitudes to Surrogate Parenthood Questionnaire (ASPQ). Participants consisted of 569 individuals, with the majority being women (n = 470, 82%). Correlations and predictors of attitudes towards surrogacy were investigated using statistical methods. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyse place of residence, parenthood and relationship status and multiple regression models were used to explain attitudes towards surrogacy (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04732559).

Results: The Surrogacy Ethical Context strongly correlates with both Acceptance of Surrogacy and Financing and Legalizing Surrogacy. Socio-demographic factors collectively explain between 6% and 18% of the variance in attitudes towards different aspects of surrogacy. Sexual orientation and religion were the strongest predictors of the attitudes towards surrogacy. Individuals who view surrogacy more positively in terms of ethics and legal considerations reflected fewer cognitive concerns regarding both types of surrogacy.

Conclusions: Findings show societal trends in acceptance and apprehension towards surrogacy, offering insights relevant for policymakers, healthcare providers, and advocacy groups involved in reproductive rights and technologies. These findings highlight the importance of considering socio-demographic diversity when analysing attitudes towards surrogacy, highlighting distinct patterns of acceptance and concern across different demographic groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology reports and reviews outstanding research on psychological, behavioural, medical and social aspects of human reproduction, pregnancy and infancy. Medical topics focus on obstetrics and gynaecology, paediatrics and psychiatry. The growing work in relevant aspects of medical communication and medical sociology are also covered. Relevant psychological work includes developmental psychology, clinical psychology, social psychology, behavioural medicine, psychology of women and health psychology. Research into psychological aspects of midwifery, health visiting and nursing is central to the interests of the Journal. The Journal is of special value to those concerned with interdisciplinary issues. As a result, the Journal is of particular interest to those concerned with fundamental processes in behaviour and to issues of health promotion and service organization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信