控制源和大五人格特征能否解释个体对代理判断的社会影响差异？

IF 5 1区心理学 Q1 Psychology

Journal of Personality Pub Date : 2025-06-05 DOI:10.1111/jopy.13030

Mark Wulff Carstensen, Pierre Jacquet, David Cohen, Marlène Jan, Mario Speranza, Axel Baptista, Valerian Chambon

{"title":"控制源和大五人格特征能否解释个体对代理判断的社会影响差异？","authors":"Mark Wulff Carstensen, Pierre Jacquet, David Cohen, Marlène Jan, Mario Speranza, Axel Baptista, Valerian Chambon","doi":"10.1111/jopy.13030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The sense of agency might be jointly affected by situational and interindividual factors. In this study, we examined whether personality traits and control beliefs can explain individual differences in both (1) sense of agency and (2) susceptibility of agency judgments to social influence.Method: To do so, we used measures of the Big Five Personality Traits and Levenson's Locus of Control in combination with a task based on an interactive computer game, which we submitted to a large cohort of online participants (N = 562). We manipulated sensorimotor agency cues related to action control as well as social information communicated to participants.Results: Our results show that while locus of control beliefs are related to differences in sense of agency, neither Big Five personality traits nor locus of control beliefs can account for differences in susceptibility to social influence.Conclusion: Locus of control and Big Five personality traits can account for some differences in sense of agency, but not for differences in belief alignment.","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Locus of Control and Big Five Personality Traits Account for Individual Differences in Social Influence on Agency Judgments?\",\"authors\":\"Mark Wulff Carstensen, Pierre Jacquet, David Cohen, Marlène Jan, Mario Speranza, Axel Baptista, Valerian Chambon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jopy.13030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The sense of agency might be jointly affected by situational and interindividual factors. In this study, we examined whether personality traits and control beliefs can explain individual differences in both (1) sense of agency and (2) susceptibility of agency judgments to social influence.Method: To do so, we used measures of the Big Five Personality Traits and Levenson's Locus of Control in combination with a task based on an interactive computer game, which we submitted to a large cohort of online participants (N = 562). We manipulated sensorimotor agency cues related to action control as well as social information communicated to participants.Results: Our results show that while locus of control beliefs are related to differences in sense of agency, neither Big Five personality traits nor locus of control beliefs can account for differences in susceptibility to social influence.Conclusion: Locus of control and Big Five personality traits can account for some differences in sense of agency, but not for differences in belief alignment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Personality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Personality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.13030\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.13030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的：代理感可能受到情境因素和个体间因素的共同影响。在本研究中，我们考察了人格特质和控制信念是否可以解释个体在(1)代理意识和(2)代理判断对社会影响的易感性方面的差异。方法：为此，我们使用了五大人格特征和利文森控制点的测量方法，并结合了一个基于交互式电脑游戏的任务，我们将该任务提交给了一大群在线参与者（N = 562）。我们操纵了与动作控制相关的感觉运动代理线索以及传递给参与者的社会信息。结果：控制点信念与代理感的差异有关，但五大人格特征和控制点信念都不能解释社会影响易感性的差异。结论：控制点和大五人格特征可以解释代理感的差异，但不能解释信念一致性的差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Do Locus of Control and Big Five Personality Traits Account for Individual Differences in Social Influence on Agency Judgments?

Objective: The sense of agency might be jointly affected by situational and interindividual factors. In this study, we examined whether personality traits and control beliefs can explain individual differences in both (1) sense of agency and (2) susceptibility of agency judgments to social influence.

Method: To do so, we used measures of the Big Five Personality Traits and Levenson's Locus of Control in combination with a task based on an interactive computer game, which we submitted to a large cohort of online participants (N = 562). We manipulated sensorimotor agency cues related to action control as well as social information communicated to participants.

Results: Our results show that while locus of control beliefs are related to differences in sense of agency, neither Big Five personality traits nor locus of control beliefs can account for differences in susceptibility to social influence.

Conclusion: Locus of control and Big Five personality traits can account for some differences in sense of agency, but not for differences in belief alignment.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-

CiteScore

9.60

自引率

6.00%

发文量

100

期刊介绍： Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.