{"title":"模拟SARS-CoV-2的流行和不同疫苗在不同网络结构中的功效。","authors":"Gregg Hartvigsen, Yannis Dimitroff","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0325129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We developed a network-based SEIRV model to test different vaccine efficacies on SARS-CoV-2 (Betacoronavirus pandemicum) dynamics in a naive population of 25,000 susceptible adults. Different vaccine efficacies, derived from data, were administered at different rates across a range of different Watts-Strogatz network structures. The model suggests that differences among vaccines were of minor importance compared to vaccination rates and network structure. Additionally, we tested the effect of strain differences in transmissibility (R0 values of 2.5 and 5.0) and found that this was the most important factor influencing the number of individuals ultimately infected. However, network structure was most important in affecting the maximum number of individuals that were infectious during the epidemic peak. The interaction of network structure, vaccination effort, and difference in strain transmissibility was highly significant for all epidemic metrics. The model suggests that differences in vaccine efficacy are not as important as vaccination rate in reducing epidemic sizes. Further, the importance of the evolution of viral transmission rates and our ability to develop effective vaccines to combat these strains will be of primary concern for our ability to control future disease epidemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 6","pages":"e0325129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic and the efficacy of different vaccines across different network structures.\",\"authors\":\"Gregg Hartvigsen, Yannis Dimitroff\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0325129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We developed a network-based SEIRV model to test different vaccine efficacies on SARS-CoV-2 (Betacoronavirus pandemicum) dynamics in a naive population of 25,000 susceptible adults. Different vaccine efficacies, derived from data, were administered at different rates across a range of different Watts-Strogatz network structures. The model suggests that differences among vaccines were of minor importance compared to vaccination rates and network structure. Additionally, we tested the effect of strain differences in transmissibility (R0 values of 2.5 and 5.0) and found that this was the most important factor influencing the number of individuals ultimately infected. However, network structure was most important in affecting the maximum number of individuals that were infectious during the epidemic peak. The interaction of network structure, vaccination effort, and difference in strain transmissibility was highly significant for all epidemic metrics. The model suggests that differences in vaccine efficacy are not as important as vaccination rate in reducing epidemic sizes. Further, the importance of the evolution of viral transmission rates and our ability to develop effective vaccines to combat these strains will be of primary concern for our ability to control future disease epidemics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"e0325129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140218/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325129\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325129","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modeling the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic and the efficacy of different vaccines across different network structures.
We developed a network-based SEIRV model to test different vaccine efficacies on SARS-CoV-2 (Betacoronavirus pandemicum) dynamics in a naive population of 25,000 susceptible adults. Different vaccine efficacies, derived from data, were administered at different rates across a range of different Watts-Strogatz network structures. The model suggests that differences among vaccines were of minor importance compared to vaccination rates and network structure. Additionally, we tested the effect of strain differences in transmissibility (R0 values of 2.5 and 5.0) and found that this was the most important factor influencing the number of individuals ultimately infected. However, network structure was most important in affecting the maximum number of individuals that were infectious during the epidemic peak. The interaction of network structure, vaccination effort, and difference in strain transmissibility was highly significant for all epidemic metrics. The model suggests that differences in vaccine efficacy are not as important as vaccination rate in reducing epidemic sizes. Further, the importance of the evolution of viral transmission rates and our ability to develop effective vaccines to combat these strains will be of primary concern for our ability to control future disease epidemics.
期刊介绍:
PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides:
* Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright
* Fast publication times
* Peer review by expert, practicing researchers
* Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact
* Community-based dialogue on articles
* Worldwide media coverage