社会接触的平衡稳定效益:个人年龄和伴侣相对身体特征的影响。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-06-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0314946
Katrin Hanna Schulleri, Dongheui Lee, Leif Johannsen
{"title":"社会接触的平衡稳定效益:个人年龄和伴侣相对身体特征的影响。","authors":"Katrin Hanna Schulleri, Dongheui Lee, Leif Johannsen","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0314946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interpersonal touch (IPT) is a successful strategy to support balance during a wide range of activities in daily life, including physical education and therapy. Despite common practice, however, the influence of individual characteristics - such as age, balancing skills, motor experience, sex and anthropometry - and differences between interaction partners on the balance stabilising benefit of social touch is unknown. In an opportunity sample of 72 pairs (age range 4-63 years), we assessed an individual's postural sway and change due to IPT during single-legged stance under four sensory conditions: with or without vision in combination with IPT or without. Following hierarchical cluster analysis (Ward's method) based on individual relative responses to IPT, individual and relative partner's characteristics two participant subgroups were identified: one of less stable, more vulnerable individuals, and another of more stable, mature participants. We developed multiple linear regression models, including moderating variables, to identify predictors of IPT benefit under each condition. Without visual input, an individual's benefit of IPT was determined by their balancing skill and the partner-related difference in balancing skill but not by any other factor or partner-related difference. Especially vulnerable individuals improved considerably with IPT when visual feedback was unavailable. When vision accompanied IPT, an individual's age-related motor developmental potential also played a significant moderating role. These findings indicate that the extent to which IPT is benefitting mutual balance stabilisation does not depend on biomechanical factors. Instead, the IPT benefit emerges as a product of both partners' sensorimotor capabilities and when visual feedback is available is also moderated by a person's motor developmental potential. We discuss a theoretical framework that accounts for the observed dependencies of the effect of haptic social support on balance control.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 6","pages":"e0314946"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The balance stabilising benefit of social touch: Influence of an individual's age and the partner's relative body characteristics.\",\"authors\":\"Katrin Hanna Schulleri, Dongheui Lee, Leif Johannsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0314946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Interpersonal touch (IPT) is a successful strategy to support balance during a wide range of activities in daily life, including physical education and therapy. Despite common practice, however, the influence of individual characteristics - such as age, balancing skills, motor experience, sex and anthropometry - and differences between interaction partners on the balance stabilising benefit of social touch is unknown. In an opportunity sample of 72 pairs (age range 4-63 years), we assessed an individual's postural sway and change due to IPT during single-legged stance under four sensory conditions: with or without vision in combination with IPT or without. Following hierarchical cluster analysis (Ward's method) based on individual relative responses to IPT, individual and relative partner's characteristics two participant subgroups were identified: one of less stable, more vulnerable individuals, and another of more stable, mature participants. We developed multiple linear regression models, including moderating variables, to identify predictors of IPT benefit under each condition. Without visual input, an individual's benefit of IPT was determined by their balancing skill and the partner-related difference in balancing skill but not by any other factor or partner-related difference. Especially vulnerable individuals improved considerably with IPT when visual feedback was unavailable. When vision accompanied IPT, an individual's age-related motor developmental potential also played a significant moderating role. These findings indicate that the extent to which IPT is benefitting mutual balance stabilisation does not depend on biomechanical factors. Instead, the IPT benefit emerges as a product of both partners' sensorimotor capabilities and when visual feedback is available is also moderated by a person's motor developmental potential. We discuss a theoretical framework that accounts for the observed dependencies of the effect of haptic social support on balance control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"e0314946\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140250/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314946\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314946","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人际接触(IPT)是一种成功的策略,在日常生活中广泛的活动中支持平衡,包括体育教育和治疗。然而,尽管有普遍的做法,个体特征(如年龄、平衡技能、运动经验、性别和人体测量)以及互动伙伴之间的差异对社交接触的平衡稳定效益的影响尚不清楚。在72对(年龄范围4-63岁)的机会样本中,我们在四种感官条件下评估了个体在单腿站立时因IPT而产生的姿势摇摆和变化:有视力或没有视力联合IPT或没有。根据个体对IPT的相对反应、个体特征和相对伴侣特征进行层次聚类分析(Ward’s method),确定了两个参与者亚组:一个是不稳定的、更脆弱的个体,另一个是更稳定的、成熟的参与者。我们建立了多元线性回归模型,包括调节变量,以确定在每种情况下IPT效益的预测因子。在没有视觉输入的情况下,个体的IPT效益取决于他们的平衡技能和与伴侣相关的平衡技能差异,而不取决于任何其他因素或与伴侣相关的差异。尤其是脆弱的个体在没有视觉反馈的情况下,通过IPT得到了显著的改善。当视力伴随IPT时,个体与年龄相关的运动发展潜力也起着显著的调节作用。这些发现表明,IPT在多大程度上有利于相互平衡的稳定并不取决于生物力学因素。相反,IPT的好处是双方感觉运动能力的产物,当视觉反馈可用时,也会被一个人的运动发展潜力所调节。我们讨论了一个理论框架,该框架解释了触觉社会支持对平衡控制的影响所观察到的依赖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The balance stabilising benefit of social touch: Influence of an individual's age and the partner's relative body characteristics.

Interpersonal touch (IPT) is a successful strategy to support balance during a wide range of activities in daily life, including physical education and therapy. Despite common practice, however, the influence of individual characteristics - such as age, balancing skills, motor experience, sex and anthropometry - and differences between interaction partners on the balance stabilising benefit of social touch is unknown. In an opportunity sample of 72 pairs (age range 4-63 years), we assessed an individual's postural sway and change due to IPT during single-legged stance under four sensory conditions: with or without vision in combination with IPT or without. Following hierarchical cluster analysis (Ward's method) based on individual relative responses to IPT, individual and relative partner's characteristics two participant subgroups were identified: one of less stable, more vulnerable individuals, and another of more stable, mature participants. We developed multiple linear regression models, including moderating variables, to identify predictors of IPT benefit under each condition. Without visual input, an individual's benefit of IPT was determined by their balancing skill and the partner-related difference in balancing skill but not by any other factor or partner-related difference. Especially vulnerable individuals improved considerably with IPT when visual feedback was unavailable. When vision accompanied IPT, an individual's age-related motor developmental potential also played a significant moderating role. These findings indicate that the extent to which IPT is benefitting mutual balance stabilisation does not depend on biomechanical factors. Instead, the IPT benefit emerges as a product of both partners' sensorimotor capabilities and when visual feedback is available is also moderated by a person's motor developmental potential. We discuss a theoretical framework that accounts for the observed dependencies of the effect of haptic social support on balance control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信