孕妇使用RSV疫苗或nirseimab预防婴儿RSV的意向

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-03 DOI:10.1097/INF.0000000000004889
Timothy Callaghan, Lauren A Wise, Annette K Regan
{"title":"孕妇使用RSV疫苗或nirseimab预防婴儿RSV的意向","authors":"Timothy Callaghan, Lauren A Wise, Annette K Regan","doi":"10.1097/INF.0000000000004889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of hospitalization among infants in the United States. While 2 new immunization products have been developed to prevent RSV in infants-RSVpreF vaccine (a prefusion F protein-based vaccine for pregnant individuals) and nirsevimab (a monoclonal antibody for infants)-intended uptake of these products is unclear. Our objective was to evaluate intended uptake of each product and their correlates among pregnant individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationally representative survey of pregnant individuals weighted to the US population of births between September 20 and October 3, 2023. Primary outcomes included whether each participant intended to receive RSVpreF vaccine during pregnancy or immunize their infant with nirsevimab; beliefs about product safety, effectiveness and importance; and reasons for hesitancy. We used logistic regression to identify correlates of intent and product support, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, political orientation and psychological dispositions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly 45% of participants intended to receive RSVpreF vaccine during their pregnancy, and 51% of participants intended to give their infants nirsevimab; 41% did not intend to use either product. Intention to use RSVpreF vaccine or nirsevimab was higher among those who were previously aware of the products and who viewed each product as safe, effective and important. Common reasons for hesitancy included concerns about side effects, impacts on infants and the immunizations being too new.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health communication interventions that increase awareness about RSV immunizations and highlight their safety, effectiveness and importance are needed to increase intended uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":19858,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1126-1133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intention to Use RSVpreF Vaccine or Nirsevimab to Prevent Infant RSV Among Pregnant Individuals.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy Callaghan, Lauren A Wise, Annette K Regan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/INF.0000000000004889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of hospitalization among infants in the United States. While 2 new immunization products have been developed to prevent RSV in infants-RSVpreF vaccine (a prefusion F protein-based vaccine for pregnant individuals) and nirsevimab (a monoclonal antibody for infants)-intended uptake of these products is unclear. Our objective was to evaluate intended uptake of each product and their correlates among pregnant individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationally representative survey of pregnant individuals weighted to the US population of births between September 20 and October 3, 2023. Primary outcomes included whether each participant intended to receive RSVpreF vaccine during pregnancy or immunize their infant with nirsevimab; beliefs about product safety, effectiveness and importance; and reasons for hesitancy. We used logistic regression to identify correlates of intent and product support, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, political orientation and psychological dispositions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly 45% of participants intended to receive RSVpreF vaccine during their pregnancy, and 51% of participants intended to give their infants nirsevimab; 41% did not intend to use either product. Intention to use RSVpreF vaccine or nirsevimab was higher among those who were previously aware of the products and who viewed each product as safe, effective and important. Common reasons for hesitancy included concerns about side effects, impacts on infants and the immunizations being too new.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health communication interventions that increase awareness about RSV immunizations and highlight their safety, effectiveness and importance are needed to increase intended uptake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1126-1133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000004889\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000004889","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)是美国婴儿住院的主要原因。虽然已经开发了两种新的预防婴儿呼吸道合胞病毒的免疫产品——rsvpref疫苗(一种针对孕妇的基于预融合F蛋白的疫苗)和nirsevimab(一种针对婴儿的单克隆抗体)——但这些产品的预期摄取尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估每种产品的预期摄入量及其在怀孕个体中的相关性。方法:我们对2023年9月20日至10月3日期间出生的美国孕妇进行了一项全国代表性的调查。主要结局包括每位参与者是否打算在怀孕期间接种RSVpreF疫苗或用nirsevimab对婴儿进行免疫;对产品安全性、有效性和重要性的信念;以及犹豫的原因。我们使用逻辑回归来确定意图和产品支持的相关性,控制社会人口统计学特征,政治取向和心理倾向。结果:近45%的参与者打算在怀孕期间接种RSVpreF疫苗,51%的参与者打算给他们的婴儿注射nirsevimab;41%的人不打算使用这两种产品。在先前了解产品并认为每种产品安全、有效和重要的人群中,使用RSVpreF疫苗或nirsevimab的意愿更高。犹豫的常见原因包括担心副作用、对婴儿的影响以及免疫接种太新。结论:需要采取卫生传播干预措施,提高对RSV免疫接种的认识,并强调其安全性、有效性和重要性,以提高预期吸收率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intention to Use RSVpreF Vaccine or Nirsevimab to Prevent Infant RSV Among Pregnant Individuals.

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of hospitalization among infants in the United States. While 2 new immunization products have been developed to prevent RSV in infants-RSVpreF vaccine (a prefusion F protein-based vaccine for pregnant individuals) and nirsevimab (a monoclonal antibody for infants)-intended uptake of these products is unclear. Our objective was to evaluate intended uptake of each product and their correlates among pregnant individuals.

Methods: We conducted a nationally representative survey of pregnant individuals weighted to the US population of births between September 20 and October 3, 2023. Primary outcomes included whether each participant intended to receive RSVpreF vaccine during pregnancy or immunize their infant with nirsevimab; beliefs about product safety, effectiveness and importance; and reasons for hesitancy. We used logistic regression to identify correlates of intent and product support, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, political orientation and psychological dispositions.

Results: Nearly 45% of participants intended to receive RSVpreF vaccine during their pregnancy, and 51% of participants intended to give their infants nirsevimab; 41% did not intend to use either product. Intention to use RSVpreF vaccine or nirsevimab was higher among those who were previously aware of the products and who viewed each product as safe, effective and important. Common reasons for hesitancy included concerns about side effects, impacts on infants and the immunizations being too new.

Conclusions: Health communication interventions that increase awareness about RSV immunizations and highlight their safety, effectiveness and importance are needed to increase intended uptake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
566
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal® (PIDJ) is a complete, up-to-the-minute resource on infectious diseases in children. Through a mix of original studies, informative review articles, and unique case reports, PIDJ delivers the latest insights on combating disease in children — from state-of-the-art diagnostic techniques to the most effective drug therapies and other treatment protocols. It is a resource that can improve patient care and stimulate your personal research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信