运动对中度青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Reviews Pub Date : 2025-05-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.52965/001c.137661
Peng Zhao, Meng Li, Yuwei He, Jialin Wang, Ruirui Wang
{"title":"运动对中度青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Peng Zhao, Meng Li, Yuwei He, Jialin Wang, Ruirui Wang","doi":"10.52965/001c.137661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The effectiveness of exercise therapy for moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and its potential benefits when combined with other treatments require further investigation. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of exercise therapy as a conservative management strategy for AIS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science up to June 4, 2024, for RCTs. Eligible studies included AIS patients (10-18 years, Cobb angle 20°-45°) undergoing various exercise therapies, such as scoliosis-specific exercises and core stabilization training. Primary outcomes included Cobb angle, ATR, trunk appearance, QoL, and respiratory function. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment followed Cochrane guidelines, and study quality was evaluated using the 11-item PEDro scale. Meta-analyses were conducted based on standardized mean differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight RCTs with nine intervention groups were analyzed. At six months, exercise alone showed no significant advantage over bracing in improving Cobb angle, ATR, QoL, or trunk appearance (p < 0.05). However, exercise combined with other therapies significantly improved Cobb angle (MD = -6.11, 95% CI: -9.21 to -3.02), QoL (SMD = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.27 to 1.51), and lung function (SMD = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.80) at three months. These effects persisted for Cobb angle at six months (MD = -4.87, 95% CI: -8.77 to -0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low to moderate evidence suggests exercise alone is comparable to bracing for AIS, while exercise combined with other therapies offers short-term benefits for Cobb angle, QoL, and lung function.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"17 ","pages":"137661"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12139610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of exercise on patients with moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Peng Zhao, Meng Li, Yuwei He, Jialin Wang, Ruirui Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.52965/001c.137661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The effectiveness of exercise therapy for moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and its potential benefits when combined with other treatments require further investigation. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of exercise therapy as a conservative management strategy for AIS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science up to June 4, 2024, for RCTs. Eligible studies included AIS patients (10-18 years, Cobb angle 20°-45°) undergoing various exercise therapies, such as scoliosis-specific exercises and core stabilization training. Primary outcomes included Cobb angle, ATR, trunk appearance, QoL, and respiratory function. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment followed Cochrane guidelines, and study quality was evaluated using the 11-item PEDro scale. Meta-analyses were conducted based on standardized mean differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight RCTs with nine intervention groups were analyzed. At six months, exercise alone showed no significant advantage over bracing in improving Cobb angle, ATR, QoL, or trunk appearance (p < 0.05). However, exercise combined with other therapies significantly improved Cobb angle (MD = -6.11, 95% CI: -9.21 to -3.02), QoL (SMD = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.27 to 1.51), and lung function (SMD = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.80) at three months. These effects persisted for Cobb angle at six months (MD = -4.87, 95% CI: -8.77 to -0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low to moderate evidence suggests exercise alone is comparable to bracing for AIS, while exercise combined with other therapies offers short-term benefits for Cobb angle, QoL, and lung function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopedic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"137661\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12139610/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopedic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.137661\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.137661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:运动疗法治疗中度青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的有效性及其与其他治疗方法联合的潜在益处有待进一步研究。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了运动疗法作为AIS保守治疗策略的疗效。方法:按照PRISMA指南,我们检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase和Web of Science,检索截止到2024年6月4日的随机对照试验。符合条件的研究包括接受各种运动疗法的AIS患者(10-18岁,Cobb角20°-45°),如脊柱侧凸特异性运动和核心稳定训练。主要结局包括Cobb角、ATR、躯干外观、生活质量和呼吸功能。数据提取和偏倚风险评估遵循Cochrane指南,采用11项PEDro量表评估研究质量。基于标准化平均差异进行meta分析。结果:共分析8项随机对照试验,共9个干预组。在6个月时,单独运动在改善Cobb角、ATR、QoL或躯干外观方面没有明显优势(p < 0.05)。然而,运动联合其他疗法在三个月时显著改善了Cobb角(MD = -6.11, 95% CI: -9.21至-3.02)、生活质量(SMD = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.27至1.51)和肺功能(SMD = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.13至0.80)。这些影响持续到Cobb角6个月(MD = -4.87, 95% CI: -8.77至-0.98)。结论:低至中度证据表明,单独运动与支具治疗AIS相当,而运动联合其他疗法对Cobb角、生活质量和肺功能有短期益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effects of exercise on patients with moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purpose: The effectiveness of exercise therapy for moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and its potential benefits when combined with other treatments require further investigation. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of exercise therapy as a conservative management strategy for AIS.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science up to June 4, 2024, for RCTs. Eligible studies included AIS patients (10-18 years, Cobb angle 20°-45°) undergoing various exercise therapies, such as scoliosis-specific exercises and core stabilization training. Primary outcomes included Cobb angle, ATR, trunk appearance, QoL, and respiratory function. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment followed Cochrane guidelines, and study quality was evaluated using the 11-item PEDro scale. Meta-analyses were conducted based on standardized mean differences.

Results: Eight RCTs with nine intervention groups were analyzed. At six months, exercise alone showed no significant advantage over bracing in improving Cobb angle, ATR, QoL, or trunk appearance (p < 0.05). However, exercise combined with other therapies significantly improved Cobb angle (MD = -6.11, 95% CI: -9.21 to -3.02), QoL (SMD = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.27 to 1.51), and lung function (SMD = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.80) at three months. These effects persisted for Cobb angle at six months (MD = -4.87, 95% CI: -8.77 to -0.98).

Conclusions: Low to moderate evidence suggests exercise alone is comparable to bracing for AIS, while exercise combined with other therapies offers short-term benefits for Cobb angle, QoL, and lung function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopedic Reviews
Orthopedic Reviews ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信