中老年人戒烟治疗的疗效及其对健康结局的影响:范围综述

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Adrienne L Johnson, Jaqueline C Avila, Leslie Christensen, Margaret C Fahey, Jeein Jang, Sarah Jarvis, Alana Rojewski, Dana Rubenstein, Bethea A Kleykamp
{"title":"中老年人戒烟治疗的疗效及其对健康结局的影响:范围综述","authors":"Adrienne L Johnson, Jaqueline C Avila, Leslie Christensen, Margaret C Fahey, Jeein Jang, Sarah Jarvis, Alana Rojewski, Dana Rubenstein, Bethea A Kleykamp","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Middle-aged and older adults (ages 45+) have historically been overlooked in tobacco research and policy despite a quit rate half that of younger adults and the greatest near-term harms of tobacco use. A scoping review was conducted on smoking cessation treatment efficacy and its impact on health outcomes among middle-aged and older adults who smoke. This review was reported in accordance with the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five databases were searched for relevant studies: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were: Randomized controlled trials or systematic reviews published since 2008 in English; middle-aged (45-64 years) or older adult (65+ years) populations who were smoking combustible cigarettes or e-cigarettes at enrollment in a tobacco cessation treatment trial; ≥3-months follow-up period. Outcomes included health effects of smoking cessation or smoking abstinence rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>44 articles met eligibility criteria (42 RCTs and 2 reviews). Six focused on health outcomes, 36 focused on cessation outcomes, and four studies examined both health outcomes and cessation success. Six-month cessation rates ranged from 13% to 52%. Most studies did not stratify by age, but those that did suggested older adults achieved cessation rates equal to or exceeding younger adults with combined intervention of counseling and cessation medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many of the studies did not explicitly focus on older adults, but instead focused on medical conditions more prevalent within aging populations. Future research on older adults should clarify age definitions and report stratified analyses by age.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>A scoping review of RCT studies on the effectiveness and health outcomes of smoking cessation interventions in middle-aged (45-64 years) and older adults (65+ years) yielded a total of 44 relevant articles. Results showed that middle-aged and older adult smokers are just as, if not more successful at quitting smoking than their younger counterparts using a combined intervention of counseling and cessation medications. Many of the studies did not explicitly focus on older adults, but instead focused on medical conditions more prevalent within aging populations. Future research on older adults should clarify age definitions and report stratified analyses by age.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smoking Cessation Treatment Efficacy and Impact on Health Outcomes among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Adrienne L Johnson, Jaqueline C Avila, Leslie Christensen, Margaret C Fahey, Jeein Jang, Sarah Jarvis, Alana Rojewski, Dana Rubenstein, Bethea A Kleykamp\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntaf122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Middle-aged and older adults (ages 45+) have historically been overlooked in tobacco research and policy despite a quit rate half that of younger adults and the greatest near-term harms of tobacco use. A scoping review was conducted on smoking cessation treatment efficacy and its impact on health outcomes among middle-aged and older adults who smoke. This review was reported in accordance with the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five databases were searched for relevant studies: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were: Randomized controlled trials or systematic reviews published since 2008 in English; middle-aged (45-64 years) or older adult (65+ years) populations who were smoking combustible cigarettes or e-cigarettes at enrollment in a tobacco cessation treatment trial; ≥3-months follow-up period. Outcomes included health effects of smoking cessation or smoking abstinence rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>44 articles met eligibility criteria (42 RCTs and 2 reviews). Six focused on health outcomes, 36 focused on cessation outcomes, and four studies examined both health outcomes and cessation success. Six-month cessation rates ranged from 13% to 52%. Most studies did not stratify by age, but those that did suggested older adults achieved cessation rates equal to or exceeding younger adults with combined intervention of counseling and cessation medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Many of the studies did not explicitly focus on older adults, but instead focused on medical conditions more prevalent within aging populations. Future research on older adults should clarify age definitions and report stratified analyses by age.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>A scoping review of RCT studies on the effectiveness and health outcomes of smoking cessation interventions in middle-aged (45-64 years) and older adults (65+ years) yielded a total of 44 relevant articles. Results showed that middle-aged and older adult smokers are just as, if not more successful at quitting smoking than their younger counterparts using a combined intervention of counseling and cessation medications. Many of the studies did not explicitly focus on older adults, but instead focused on medical conditions more prevalent within aging populations. Future research on older adults should clarify age definitions and report stratified analyses by age.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf122\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:尽管中年和老年人(45岁以上)的戒烟率是年轻人的一半,并且烟草使用的近期危害最大,但他们历来在烟草研究和政策中被忽视。对戒烟治疗效果及其对吸烟的中老年成年人健康结果的影响进行了范围审查。该审查是根据PRISMA扩展范围审查报告的。方法:检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、PsycINFO、Cochrane Library 5个数据库进行相关研究。纳入标准为:2008年以来发表的随机对照试验或系统评价;参加戒烟治疗试验时吸烟可燃香烟或电子烟的中年人(45-64岁)或老年人(65岁以上);随访期≥3个月。结果包括戒烟或戒烟率对健康的影响。结果:44篇文章符合入选标准(42篇随机对照试验和2篇综述)。6项研究关注健康结果,36项研究关注戒烟结果,4项研究调查健康结果和戒烟成功。六个月戒烟率从13%到52%不等。大多数研究没有按年龄进行分层,但那些有分层的研究表明,通过咨询和戒烟药物的联合干预,老年人的戒烟率等于或超过了年轻人。结论:许多研究没有明确关注老年人,而是关注老年人中更普遍的医疗状况。未来对老年人的研究应明确年龄定义,并报告按年龄分层的分析。含义:对中年(45-64岁)和老年人(65岁以上)戒烟干预的有效性和健康结果的RCT研究进行了范围审查,共产生了44篇相关文章。结果显示,与年轻人相比,中年和老年吸烟者通过咨询和戒烟药物的联合干预,即使没有更成功地戒烟,也一样成功。许多研究并没有明确关注老年人,而是关注老年人中更普遍的疾病。未来对老年人的研究应明确年龄定义,并报告按年龄分层的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Smoking Cessation Treatment Efficacy and Impact on Health Outcomes among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Scoping Review.

Introduction: Middle-aged and older adults (ages 45+) have historically been overlooked in tobacco research and policy despite a quit rate half that of younger adults and the greatest near-term harms of tobacco use. A scoping review was conducted on smoking cessation treatment efficacy and its impact on health outcomes among middle-aged and older adults who smoke. This review was reported in accordance with the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews.

Methods: Five databases were searched for relevant studies: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were: Randomized controlled trials or systematic reviews published since 2008 in English; middle-aged (45-64 years) or older adult (65+ years) populations who were smoking combustible cigarettes or e-cigarettes at enrollment in a tobacco cessation treatment trial; ≥3-months follow-up period. Outcomes included health effects of smoking cessation or smoking abstinence rates.

Results: 44 articles met eligibility criteria (42 RCTs and 2 reviews). Six focused on health outcomes, 36 focused on cessation outcomes, and four studies examined both health outcomes and cessation success. Six-month cessation rates ranged from 13% to 52%. Most studies did not stratify by age, but those that did suggested older adults achieved cessation rates equal to or exceeding younger adults with combined intervention of counseling and cessation medications.

Conclusions: Many of the studies did not explicitly focus on older adults, but instead focused on medical conditions more prevalent within aging populations. Future research on older adults should clarify age definitions and report stratified analyses by age.

Implications: A scoping review of RCT studies on the effectiveness and health outcomes of smoking cessation interventions in middle-aged (45-64 years) and older adults (65+ years) yielded a total of 44 relevant articles. Results showed that middle-aged and older adult smokers are just as, if not more successful at quitting smoking than their younger counterparts using a combined intervention of counseling and cessation medications. Many of the studies did not explicitly focus on older adults, but instead focused on medical conditions more prevalent within aging populations. Future research on older adults should clarify age definitions and report stratified analyses by age.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信