基于卷积的ICON CBCT伽玛刀规划:三能级逐步电子密度分配与Hounsfield单位曲线。

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY
Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT Pub Date : 2025-01-01
Peter B Fallows, Gavin Wright
{"title":"基于卷积的ICON CBCT伽玛刀规划:三能级逐步电子密度分配与Hounsfield单位曲线。","authors":"Peter B Fallows, Gavin Wright","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the suitability of CBCT images for dose calculation using the convolution algorithm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A CT to electron density curve was produced for the Gamma Knife ICON CBCT scanner. A three-level stepwise curve with fixed electron densities for air, brain tissue and bone was also produced. For 10 patients, the beam on time for shots in 11 locations within the brain was calculated using each of these curves and compared to beam on times calculated using the TMR10 algorithm, and the convolution algorithm with CT images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ratios of the average beam on time for convolution versus TMR10 were 1.058, 1.216 and 1.052 for CT images, CBCT images (Hounsfield unit electron density curve) and CBCT images (three-level stepwise curve with fixed electron densities) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using ICON CBCT images for dose calculation can result in an underestimation of the dose compared to convolution using CT images. However, using CBCT images along with a three-level stepwise electron density curve with fixed electron densities can provide good agreement with doses calculated using convolution with CT images.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"9 3","pages":"245-252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12136681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Convolution-based Gamma Knife planning from ICON CBCT: Three-level stepwise electron density assignment versus Hounsfield Unit curve.\",\"authors\":\"Peter B Fallows, Gavin Wright\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the suitability of CBCT images for dose calculation using the convolution algorithm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A CT to electron density curve was produced for the Gamma Knife ICON CBCT scanner. A three-level stepwise curve with fixed electron densities for air, brain tissue and bone was also produced. For 10 patients, the beam on time for shots in 11 locations within the brain was calculated using each of these curves and compared to beam on times calculated using the TMR10 algorithm, and the convolution algorithm with CT images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ratios of the average beam on time for convolution versus TMR10 were 1.058, 1.216 and 1.052 for CT images, CBCT images (Hounsfield unit electron density curve) and CBCT images (three-level stepwise curve with fixed electron densities) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using ICON CBCT images for dose calculation can result in an underestimation of the dose compared to convolution using CT images. However, using CBCT images along with a three-level stepwise electron density curve with fixed electron densities can provide good agreement with doses calculated using convolution with CT images.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"245-252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12136681/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价卷积算法在CBCT图像剂量计算中的适用性。方法:对伽玛刀ICON型CBCT扫描仪制作CT -电子密度曲线。在空气、脑组织和骨骼中也产生了固定电子密度的三级阶梯曲线。对于10名患者,使用每条曲线计算大脑内11个位置的射束时间,并与使用TMR10算法计算的射束时间和使用CT图像卷积算法计算的射束时间进行比较。结果:CT图像、CBCT图像(Hounsfield单位电子密度曲线)和CBCT图像(固定电子密度的三级阶梯曲线)的卷积平均束时间与TMR10的比值分别为1.058、1.216和1.052。结论:与使用CT图像进行卷积相比,使用ICON CBCT图像进行剂量计算可能导致剂量低估。然而,使用CBCT图像和固定电子密度的三级阶梯电子密度曲线可以提供与CT图像卷积计算的剂量很好的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Convolution-based Gamma Knife planning from ICON CBCT: Three-level stepwise electron density assignment versus Hounsfield Unit curve.

Aims: To assess the suitability of CBCT images for dose calculation using the convolution algorithm.

Methods: A CT to electron density curve was produced for the Gamma Knife ICON CBCT scanner. A three-level stepwise curve with fixed electron densities for air, brain tissue and bone was also produced. For 10 patients, the beam on time for shots in 11 locations within the brain was calculated using each of these curves and compared to beam on times calculated using the TMR10 algorithm, and the convolution algorithm with CT images.

Results: The ratios of the average beam on time for convolution versus TMR10 were 1.058, 1.216 and 1.052 for CT images, CBCT images (Hounsfield unit electron density curve) and CBCT images (three-level stepwise curve with fixed electron densities) respectively.

Conclusions: Using ICON CBCT images for dose calculation can result in an underestimation of the dose compared to convolution using CT images. However, using CBCT images along with a three-level stepwise electron density curve with fixed electron densities can provide good agreement with doses calculated using convolution with CT images.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信