围攻对护士希望水平的影响:析因设计研究。

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Journal of Interpersonal Violence Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-06 DOI:10.1177/08862605251345469
Ayşegül Sarioğlu Kemer, Mükerrem Kabataş Yildiz
{"title":"围攻对护士希望水平的影响:析因设计研究。","authors":"Ayşegül Sarioğlu Kemer, Mükerrem Kabataş Yildiz","doi":"10.1177/08862605251345469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The mobbing process leads to a decrease in both personal and professional levels of hope. This study aimed to assess the influence of mobbing behaviors, both witnessed and experienced, on the levels of hope among nurses. This study employed a descriptive and cross-sectional design. Data were gathered from 246 nurses working in the eastern part of Türkiye using a Demographic Information Form and the Hope Scale. Data were analyzed using a factorial design. Numerical, percentage, and two-way analysis of variance (2X2 ANOVA) for independent groups were performed in data analysis. The study revealed that 53.7% of nurses had witnessed or experienced mobbing, while 29.7% had neither witnessed nor experienced it. The mean total score for nurses on the Hope Scale was 21.61 ± 7.98. It was determined that witnessing mobbing had a 19.5% impact, experiencing mobbing had a 38.3% impact, and the combined effect of witnessing and experiencing mobbing had an 8.4% impact on hope scores. According to variance analysis, the hope scores of nurses who witnessed or experienced mobbing were significantly lower than those of other groups. The majority of nurses have been exposed to or witnessed mobbing, and they experience moderate levels of hope. Experiencing mobbing alone or witnessing it alone significantly affects nurses' levels of hope, while their combined effect has a moderate impact. An impartial examination of mobbing processes within institutions is a crucial policy contributing to nurses' professional development, compassionate care provision, and psychosocial well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":" ","pages":"3911-3928"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Mobbing on Nurses' Levels of Hope: A Factorial Design Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ayşegül Sarioğlu Kemer, Mükerrem Kabataş Yildiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08862605251345469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The mobbing process leads to a decrease in both personal and professional levels of hope. This study aimed to assess the influence of mobbing behaviors, both witnessed and experienced, on the levels of hope among nurses. This study employed a descriptive and cross-sectional design. Data were gathered from 246 nurses working in the eastern part of Türkiye using a Demographic Information Form and the Hope Scale. Data were analyzed using a factorial design. Numerical, percentage, and two-way analysis of variance (2X2 ANOVA) for independent groups were performed in data analysis. The study revealed that 53.7% of nurses had witnessed or experienced mobbing, while 29.7% had neither witnessed nor experienced it. The mean total score for nurses on the Hope Scale was 21.61 ± 7.98. It was determined that witnessing mobbing had a 19.5% impact, experiencing mobbing had a 38.3% impact, and the combined effect of witnessing and experiencing mobbing had an 8.4% impact on hope scores. According to variance analysis, the hope scores of nurses who witnessed or experienced mobbing were significantly lower than those of other groups. The majority of nurses have been exposed to or witnessed mobbing, and they experience moderate levels of hope. Experiencing mobbing alone or witnessing it alone significantly affects nurses' levels of hope, while their combined effect has a moderate impact. An impartial examination of mobbing processes within institutions is a crucial policy contributing to nurses' professional development, compassionate care provision, and psychosocial well-being.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Violence\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3911-3928\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251345469\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251345469","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这种围攻的过程会导致个人和职业的希望水平下降。本研究旨在评估围观行为对护士希望水平的影响,包括亲眼目睹的和亲身经历的。本研究采用描述性和横断面设计。使用人口统计信息表和希望量表收集了来自基耶东部地区工作的246名护士的数据。数据分析采用因子设计。数据分析采用独立组的数值、百分比和双向方差分析(2X2 ANOVA)。研究发现,53.7%的护士目睹或经历过围殴,29.7%的护士既没有目睹也没有经历过围殴。护士希望量表的平均总分为21.61±7.98分。结果表明,目睹暴民事件对希望得分的影响为19.5%,经历暴民事件对希望得分的影响为38.3%,目睹暴民事件与经历暴民事件的综合影响为8.4%。方差分析显示,目睹或经历过围观者的护士希望得分明显低于其他组。大多数护士都曾接触过或目睹过袭击事件,她们感到有一定程度的希望。单独经历或目睹围攻会显著影响护士的希望水平,而两者的综合影响则是中等程度的。对机构内的围攻过程进行公正的审查是一项至关重要的政策,有助于护士的专业发展、提供富有同情心的护理和社会心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Mobbing on Nurses' Levels of Hope: A Factorial Design Study.

The mobbing process leads to a decrease in both personal and professional levels of hope. This study aimed to assess the influence of mobbing behaviors, both witnessed and experienced, on the levels of hope among nurses. This study employed a descriptive and cross-sectional design. Data were gathered from 246 nurses working in the eastern part of Türkiye using a Demographic Information Form and the Hope Scale. Data were analyzed using a factorial design. Numerical, percentage, and two-way analysis of variance (2X2 ANOVA) for independent groups were performed in data analysis. The study revealed that 53.7% of nurses had witnessed or experienced mobbing, while 29.7% had neither witnessed nor experienced it. The mean total score for nurses on the Hope Scale was 21.61 ± 7.98. It was determined that witnessing mobbing had a 19.5% impact, experiencing mobbing had a 38.3% impact, and the combined effect of witnessing and experiencing mobbing had an 8.4% impact on hope scores. According to variance analysis, the hope scores of nurses who witnessed or experienced mobbing were significantly lower than those of other groups. The majority of nurses have been exposed to or witnessed mobbing, and they experience moderate levels of hope. Experiencing mobbing alone or witnessing it alone significantly affects nurses' levels of hope, while their combined effect has a moderate impact. An impartial examination of mobbing processes within institutions is a crucial policy contributing to nurses' professional development, compassionate care provision, and psychosocial well-being.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信