每一秒计数:2267个单倍体冷冻胚胎移植后,胚胎移植时间与活产的关联。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Blake Vessa, Devika Sachdev, Leah Roberts, Kara Scarpetti, Christine Whitehead, Maria Costantini, Paul Bergh, Marie Werner, Kassie Bollig
{"title":"每一秒计数:2267个单倍体冷冻胚胎移植后,胚胎移植时间与活产的关联。","authors":"Blake Vessa, Devika Sachdev, Leah Roberts, Kara Scarpetti, Christine Whitehead, Maria Costantini, Paul Bergh, Marie Werner, Kassie Bollig","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03520-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify the impact of the duration of the embryo transfer procedure on pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study at a single center including single euploid frozen embryo transfers from April to December 2022. Embryo transfer time was defined as the total time (seconds) from when the embryologist handed the catheter with the loaded embryo to the physician, to the release of the embryo into the uterus. Time measurements were divided into quartiles: (1) 4-27 s, (2) 28-38 s, (3) 39-54 s, and (4) 55-1028 s. The primary outcome was the probability of live birth per transfer. Secondary outcomes included biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and pregnancy loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2267 frozen embryo transfer cycles were included in the analysis. The overall live birth rate was 59.8% (1356/2267). Compared to the fastest time (1st quartile), the probability of live birth was significantly decreased for couples with the longest transfer times (4th quartile) after adjusting for possible confounding variables (aOR, 0.76; 95% CI 0.58-0.99; p = 0.046). When patients with more difficult embryo transfers, that as a result may be inherently longer, were excluded, the results were the same as the primary model. However, when data was analyzed using only first transfers, compared to the shortest transfer time quartile (1st), there was a significant decreased probability of live birth in the 3rd quartile (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.94, p = 0.025), but no significant differences in the 2nd or 4th quartile groups (p = 0.213, p = 0.800). There were no differences in the probability of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, or pregnancy loss in the fully adjusted model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The longest embryo transfer times are associated with significantly decreased probability of live birth.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Every second counts: the association of embryo transfer duration with live birth following 2267 single, euploid, frozen embryo transfer.\",\"authors\":\"Blake Vessa, Devika Sachdev, Leah Roberts, Kara Scarpetti, Christine Whitehead, Maria Costantini, Paul Bergh, Marie Werner, Kassie Bollig\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10815-025-03520-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify the impact of the duration of the embryo transfer procedure on pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study at a single center including single euploid frozen embryo transfers from April to December 2022. Embryo transfer time was defined as the total time (seconds) from when the embryologist handed the catheter with the loaded embryo to the physician, to the release of the embryo into the uterus. Time measurements were divided into quartiles: (1) 4-27 s, (2) 28-38 s, (3) 39-54 s, and (4) 55-1028 s. The primary outcome was the probability of live birth per transfer. Secondary outcomes included biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and pregnancy loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2267 frozen embryo transfer cycles were included in the analysis. The overall live birth rate was 59.8% (1356/2267). Compared to the fastest time (1st quartile), the probability of live birth was significantly decreased for couples with the longest transfer times (4th quartile) after adjusting for possible confounding variables (aOR, 0.76; 95% CI 0.58-0.99; p = 0.046). When patients with more difficult embryo transfers, that as a result may be inherently longer, were excluded, the results were the same as the primary model. However, when data was analyzed using only first transfers, compared to the shortest transfer time quartile (1st), there was a significant decreased probability of live birth in the 3rd quartile (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.94, p = 0.025), but no significant differences in the 2nd or 4th quartile groups (p = 0.213, p = 0.800). There were no differences in the probability of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, or pregnancy loss in the fully adjusted model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The longest embryo transfer times are associated with significantly decreased probability of live birth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03520-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03520-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定胚胎移植过程持续时间对妊娠结局的影响。方法:这是一项单中心的回顾性队列研究,包括2022年4月至12月的单整倍体冷冻胚胎移植。胚胎移植时间定义为从胚胎学家将携带胚胎的导管交给医生到胚胎释放到子宫内的总时间(秒)。时间测量分为四分位数:(1)4-27秒,(2)28-38秒,(3)39-54秒,(4)55-1028秒。主要结果是每次转移的活产概率。次要结局包括生化妊娠、临床妊娠和流产。结果:共纳入2267个冷冻胚胎移植周期。总活产率为59.8%(1356/2267)。与最快的时间(第1四分位数)相比,在调整可能的混杂变量后,转移时间最长的夫妇(第4四分位数)的活产概率显著降低(aOR, 0.76;95% ci 0.58-0.99;p = 0.046)。当排除胚胎移植难度较大的患者时,结果可能会更长,结果与主要模型相同。然而,当仅使用第一次转移进行数据分析时,与最短转移时间四分位数(第1次)相比,第3四分位数的活产概率显著降低(OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.94, p = 0.025),但第2或第4四分位数组无显著差异(p = 0.213, p = 0.800)。在完全调整后的模型中,生化妊娠、临床妊娠、流产的概率均无差异。结论:胚胎移植时间越长,活产率越低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Every second counts: the association of embryo transfer duration with live birth following 2267 single, euploid, frozen embryo transfer.

Purpose: To identify the impact of the duration of the embryo transfer procedure on pregnancy outcomes.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study at a single center including single euploid frozen embryo transfers from April to December 2022. Embryo transfer time was defined as the total time (seconds) from when the embryologist handed the catheter with the loaded embryo to the physician, to the release of the embryo into the uterus. Time measurements were divided into quartiles: (1) 4-27 s, (2) 28-38 s, (3) 39-54 s, and (4) 55-1028 s. The primary outcome was the probability of live birth per transfer. Secondary outcomes included biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and pregnancy loss.

Results: A total of 2267 frozen embryo transfer cycles were included in the analysis. The overall live birth rate was 59.8% (1356/2267). Compared to the fastest time (1st quartile), the probability of live birth was significantly decreased for couples with the longest transfer times (4th quartile) after adjusting for possible confounding variables (aOR, 0.76; 95% CI 0.58-0.99; p = 0.046). When patients with more difficult embryo transfers, that as a result may be inherently longer, were excluded, the results were the same as the primary model. However, when data was analyzed using only first transfers, compared to the shortest transfer time quartile (1st), there was a significant decreased probability of live birth in the 3rd quartile (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.94, p = 0.025), but no significant differences in the 2nd or 4th quartile groups (p = 0.213, p = 0.800). There were no differences in the probability of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, or pregnancy loss in the fully adjusted model.

Conclusion: The longest embryo transfer times are associated with significantly decreased probability of live birth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信