{"title":"使用高强度回波带作为标志的左心室容积和射血分数的准确性:二维超声心动图与心脏磁共振成像的比较。","authors":"Takaya Higuchi, Yasuyuki Chiba, Nobuaki Yoshino, Kenichi Matsubara, Mashiro Taniguchi, Yuki Ogino, Toshihiro Shimizu, Toshihisa Anzai","doi":"10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.05.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The trace line for left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) measurements in 2-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) are often based on the empirical judgment of the examiner. We evaluated whether trace lines along the inner side of the high-intensity echo band that characterized LV endocardial boundary is useful for accurate measurements, with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging as reference.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared the accuracy of LV volumes [end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV)] and EF in 73 patients, using CMR imaging as a reference. Protocol 1: 10 patients were compared by two examiners using the biplane disk summation method with trace line based on the empirical judgment of the examiner (before-learning) and trace line along the inner side of the high-intensity echo band (after-learning), and inter- and intra-observer variabilities were calculated. Protocol 2: the accuracy of LV volumes and EF was compared in 73 patients using the after-learning method. Bland-Altman analysis were used to compare with 2DE and CMR. The coefficient of variation was used for inter- and intra-observer variabilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Protocol 1: For examiner 1, EDV (-16 ml vs 1 ml, p = 0.001), ESV (-9 ml vs 1 ml, p = 0.004), and SV (-7 ml vs 0 ml, p = 0.037) after learning compared with before learning were significantly approximated CMR measurements. For examiner 2, no significant differences were noted between before and after learning. The variability in measurements was smaller for all items by both examiners. Inter-observer variability after learning was improved compared with before learning, and intra-observer variability was also better. Protocol 2: LV volumes and EF measurements after learning were almost as accurate as CMR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LV volumes and EF using after-learning trace approximated CMR measurements. Having landmark on trace line may contribute to quality control.</p>","PeriodicalId":15223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using high-intensity echo band as a landmark: Comparison between two-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Takaya Higuchi, Yasuyuki Chiba, Nobuaki Yoshino, Kenichi Matsubara, Mashiro Taniguchi, Yuki Ogino, Toshihiro Shimizu, Toshihisa Anzai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.05.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The trace line for left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) measurements in 2-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) are often based on the empirical judgment of the examiner. We evaluated whether trace lines along the inner side of the high-intensity echo band that characterized LV endocardial boundary is useful for accurate measurements, with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging as reference.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared the accuracy of LV volumes [end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV)] and EF in 73 patients, using CMR imaging as a reference. Protocol 1: 10 patients were compared by two examiners using the biplane disk summation method with trace line based on the empirical judgment of the examiner (before-learning) and trace line along the inner side of the high-intensity echo band (after-learning), and inter- and intra-observer variabilities were calculated. Protocol 2: the accuracy of LV volumes and EF was compared in 73 patients using the after-learning method. Bland-Altman analysis were used to compare with 2DE and CMR. The coefficient of variation was used for inter- and intra-observer variabilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Protocol 1: For examiner 1, EDV (-16 ml vs 1 ml, p = 0.001), ESV (-9 ml vs 1 ml, p = 0.004), and SV (-7 ml vs 0 ml, p = 0.037) after learning compared with before learning were significantly approximated CMR measurements. For examiner 2, no significant differences were noted between before and after learning. The variability in measurements was smaller for all items by both examiners. Inter-observer variability after learning was improved compared with before learning, and intra-observer variability was also better. Protocol 2: LV volumes and EF measurements after learning were almost as accurate as CMR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LV volumes and EF using after-learning trace approximated CMR measurements. Having landmark on trace line may contribute to quality control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.05.017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.05.017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:二维超声心动图(2DE)中左心室(LV)容量和射血分数(EF)测量的痕迹线通常基于检查者的经验判断。我们评估沿高强度回波带内侧表征左室心内膜边界的痕迹线是否有助于准确测量,并以心脏磁共振(CMR)成像为参考。方法:我们比较73例患者左室容积[舒张末期容积(EDV)、收缩末期容积(ESV)、卒中容积(SV)]和EF的准确性,并以CMR成像为参考。方案1:10例患者由两名检查人员采用基于检查人员经验判断(学习前)和沿高强度回波带内侧(学习后)的迹线双翼盘累加法进行比较,并计算观察者之间和观察者内部的变量。方案2:采用后学习法比较73例患者左室容积和EF的准确性。采用Bland-Altman分析与2DE和CMR进行比较。变异系数用于观察者之间和观察者内部的变异。结果:协议1:考官1,产品类别(-16 vs 毫升 ml, p = 0.001),ESV(9 毫升vs 1 ml, p = 0.004),和SV(7 毫升vs 0 ml, p = 0.037)学习与之前相比学习后明显近似CMR测量。对于考官2来说,学习前后没有明显的差异。在测量的变异性是较小的所有项目由两个审查员。与学习前相比,学习后观察者间的变异性有所改善,观察者内的变异性也有所改善。方案2:学习后左室容积和EF测量几乎与CMR一样准确。结论:左室体积和EF使用学习后跟踪近似CMR测量。在跟踪线上有标记有助于质量控制。
Accuracy of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using high-intensity echo band as a landmark: Comparison between two-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Background: The trace line for left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) measurements in 2-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) are often based on the empirical judgment of the examiner. We evaluated whether trace lines along the inner side of the high-intensity echo band that characterized LV endocardial boundary is useful for accurate measurements, with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging as reference.
Methods: We compared the accuracy of LV volumes [end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV)] and EF in 73 patients, using CMR imaging as a reference. Protocol 1: 10 patients were compared by two examiners using the biplane disk summation method with trace line based on the empirical judgment of the examiner (before-learning) and trace line along the inner side of the high-intensity echo band (after-learning), and inter- and intra-observer variabilities were calculated. Protocol 2: the accuracy of LV volumes and EF was compared in 73 patients using the after-learning method. Bland-Altman analysis were used to compare with 2DE and CMR. The coefficient of variation was used for inter- and intra-observer variabilities.
Results: Protocol 1: For examiner 1, EDV (-16 ml vs 1 ml, p = 0.001), ESV (-9 ml vs 1 ml, p = 0.004), and SV (-7 ml vs 0 ml, p = 0.037) after learning compared with before learning were significantly approximated CMR measurements. For examiner 2, no significant differences were noted between before and after learning. The variability in measurements was smaller for all items by both examiners. Inter-observer variability after learning was improved compared with before learning, and intra-observer variability was also better. Protocol 2: LV volumes and EF measurements after learning were almost as accurate as CMR.
Conclusions: LV volumes and EF using after-learning trace approximated CMR measurements. Having landmark on trace line may contribute to quality control.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the Japanese College of Cardiology is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal publishing the latest findings in cardiovascular medicine. Journal of Cardiology (JC) aims to publish the highest-quality material covering original basic and clinical research on all aspects of cardiovascular disease. Topics covered include ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, hypertension, arrhythmia, congenital heart disease, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, new diagnostic techniques, and cardiovascular imaging. JC also publishes a selection of review articles, clinical trials, short communications, and important messages and letters to the editor.