依诺肝素滴定预防烧伤患者静脉血栓栓塞-单中心经验。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Kevin Vega, Morgan Palumbo, Ke Cheng, Huaqing Zhao, Jeffrey Anderson
{"title":"依诺肝素滴定预防烧伤患者静脉血栓栓塞-单中心经验。","authors":"Kevin Vega, Morgan Palumbo, Ke Cheng, Huaqing Zhao, Jeffrey Anderson","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burn injured patients develop altered metabolic processes predisposing them to venous thromboembolism and bleeding. Enoxaparin titration for venous thromboembolism prevention in trauma patients is safe, but this approach is not well defined in burn injured patients. We hypothesized that titration of enoxaparin in burn patients is safe and does not increase bleeding risk. We compared a fixed dose 30 mg twice-daily enoxaparin dosing regimen to anti-Xa guided, twice-daily enoxaparin titration. Trough anti-Xa levels were measured and adjusted by 10 mg intervals with repeat anti-Xa levels measured before administration of the fourth or fifth dose. Starting dose in the titrated group was determined by injury type, patient characteristics, and renal clearance as per American Association of Surgeons in Trauma guidelines. 152 patients were included. 93 received fixed dosing and 59 were titrated by anti-Xa levels. There were 16 total incidents of bleeding but no difference between the two groups (p=.67). Univariate analysis revealed no differences in patient demographics or comorbidities between those with and without bleeding. When comparing dosing trends, fourteen of twenty patients (70%) initiated at 30 mg were at goal anti-Xa level on initial check, while five (25%) were sub-therapeutic, and one (5%) was supratherapeutic. Comparatively, twenty-four of thirty-nine patients (62%) started at 40 mg were at goal anti-Xa level on initial check, while nine (23%) were subtherapeutic and six (15%) were supratherapeutic. We observed that enoxaparin titration does not significantly increase bleeding risk. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine its effect on venous thromboembolism prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enoxaparin Titration for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in the Burn Injured Patient - A Single Center Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Vega, Morgan Palumbo, Ke Cheng, Huaqing Zhao, Jeffrey Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/iraf104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Burn injured patients develop altered metabolic processes predisposing them to venous thromboembolism and bleeding. Enoxaparin titration for venous thromboembolism prevention in trauma patients is safe, but this approach is not well defined in burn injured patients. We hypothesized that titration of enoxaparin in burn patients is safe and does not increase bleeding risk. We compared a fixed dose 30 mg twice-daily enoxaparin dosing regimen to anti-Xa guided, twice-daily enoxaparin titration. Trough anti-Xa levels were measured and adjusted by 10 mg intervals with repeat anti-Xa levels measured before administration of the fourth or fifth dose. Starting dose in the titrated group was determined by injury type, patient characteristics, and renal clearance as per American Association of Surgeons in Trauma guidelines. 152 patients were included. 93 received fixed dosing and 59 were titrated by anti-Xa levels. There were 16 total incidents of bleeding but no difference between the two groups (p=.67). Univariate analysis revealed no differences in patient demographics or comorbidities between those with and without bleeding. When comparing dosing trends, fourteen of twenty patients (70%) initiated at 30 mg were at goal anti-Xa level on initial check, while five (25%) were sub-therapeutic, and one (5%) was supratherapeutic. Comparatively, twenty-four of thirty-nine patients (62%) started at 40 mg were at goal anti-Xa level on initial check, while nine (23%) were subtherapeutic and six (15%) were supratherapeutic. We observed that enoxaparin titration does not significantly increase bleeding risk. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine its effect on venous thromboembolism prevention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf104\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

烧伤患者的代谢过程发生改变,易发生静脉血栓栓塞和出血。依诺肝素滴定预防创伤患者静脉血栓栓塞是安全的,但这种方法在烧伤患者中还没有很好的定义。我们假设烧伤患者滴注依诺肝素是安全的,不会增加出血风险。我们比较了固定剂量30mg每日两次的依诺肝素给药方案和抗xa引导,每日两次的依诺肝素滴定。测量谷抗xa水平,每隔10 mg调整一次,在给药前重复测量抗xa水平。根据美国创伤外科医师协会指南,滴定组的起始剂量由损伤类型、患者特征和肾脏清除率决定。纳入152例患者。93例固定给药,59例抗xa水平滴定。两组共发生16例出血,差异无统计学意义(p= 0.67)。单因素分析显示,有出血和没有出血的患者在人口统计学或合并症方面没有差异。在比较给药趋势时,20例患者中有14例(70%)在初始检查时达到目标抗xa水平,而5例(25%)为亚治疗,1例(5%)为超治疗。相比之下,39例患者中有24例(62%)在初始检查时达到目标抗xa水平,而9例(23%)处于亚治疗状态,6例(15%)处于超治疗状态。我们观察到依诺肝素滴定不会显著增加出血风险。需要更大规模的研究来证实这些发现,并确定其对静脉血栓栓塞的预防作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enoxaparin Titration for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in the Burn Injured Patient - A Single Center Experience.

Burn injured patients develop altered metabolic processes predisposing them to venous thromboembolism and bleeding. Enoxaparin titration for venous thromboembolism prevention in trauma patients is safe, but this approach is not well defined in burn injured patients. We hypothesized that titration of enoxaparin in burn patients is safe and does not increase bleeding risk. We compared a fixed dose 30 mg twice-daily enoxaparin dosing regimen to anti-Xa guided, twice-daily enoxaparin titration. Trough anti-Xa levels were measured and adjusted by 10 mg intervals with repeat anti-Xa levels measured before administration of the fourth or fifth dose. Starting dose in the titrated group was determined by injury type, patient characteristics, and renal clearance as per American Association of Surgeons in Trauma guidelines. 152 patients were included. 93 received fixed dosing and 59 were titrated by anti-Xa levels. There were 16 total incidents of bleeding but no difference between the two groups (p=.67). Univariate analysis revealed no differences in patient demographics or comorbidities between those with and without bleeding. When comparing dosing trends, fourteen of twenty patients (70%) initiated at 30 mg were at goal anti-Xa level on initial check, while five (25%) were sub-therapeutic, and one (5%) was supratherapeutic. Comparatively, twenty-four of thirty-nine patients (62%) started at 40 mg were at goal anti-Xa level on initial check, while nine (23%) were subtherapeutic and six (15%) were supratherapeutic. We observed that enoxaparin titration does not significantly increase bleeding risk. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine its effect on venous thromboembolism prevention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信