Lucy S Robertson, Georgia Fisher, Joanna Diong, Annie A Butler, Simon C Gandevia, Martin E Héroux
{"title":"脑卒中、帕金森病和多发性硬化症患者本体感觉能力与身体功能的关系:系统综述","authors":"Lucy S Robertson, Georgia Fisher, Joanna Diong, Annie A Butler, Simon C Gandevia, Martin E Héroux","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00088.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationship between proprioceptive ability and physical function is commonly assessed in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis to investigate the aetiology of functional deficits. The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the magnitude of this association in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis. We also investigated whether the magnitude of these associations was influenced by i) study sample size, ii) the pairing of body regions targeted by assessments of proprioceptive ability and physical function, iii) the proprioceptive sense assessed, and iv) the type of proprioceptive assessment (low-level proprioception; high-level proprioception). A total of 56 studies reporting 438 measures of association were included. The magnitude of the associations ranged from -0.31 to 0.93 (r and ρ), with 92% being positive (better proprioceptive ability associated with better physical function). Study sample size, pairing of assessments and type of low-level proprioceptive assessment (detect, discriminate, match) did not systematically influence the direction or magnitude of the associations. 97% of assessments focused on low-level proprioception and kinesthesia (position and movement sense). When studies discussed their measures of association, 50% used language that implied causality. Despite a detailed breakdown of measures of association, no clear pattern emerged regarding the link between proprioceptive ability and physical function. Future studies in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis should i) move away from simple measures of association to infer causation given that several interrelated and potentially confounding deficits co-exist and ii) assess various aspects of proprioception, including high-level proprioception, as they differentially contribute to physical function.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relation between proprioceptive ability and physical function in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Lucy S Robertson, Georgia Fisher, Joanna Diong, Annie A Butler, Simon C Gandevia, Martin E Héroux\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/japplphysiol.00088.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The relationship between proprioceptive ability and physical function is commonly assessed in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis to investigate the aetiology of functional deficits. The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the magnitude of this association in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis. We also investigated whether the magnitude of these associations was influenced by i) study sample size, ii) the pairing of body regions targeted by assessments of proprioceptive ability and physical function, iii) the proprioceptive sense assessed, and iv) the type of proprioceptive assessment (low-level proprioception; high-level proprioception). A total of 56 studies reporting 438 measures of association were included. The magnitude of the associations ranged from -0.31 to 0.93 (r and ρ), with 92% being positive (better proprioceptive ability associated with better physical function). Study sample size, pairing of assessments and type of low-level proprioceptive assessment (detect, discriminate, match) did not systematically influence the direction or magnitude of the associations. 97% of assessments focused on low-level proprioception and kinesthesia (position and movement sense). When studies discussed their measures of association, 50% used language that implied causality. Despite a detailed breakdown of measures of association, no clear pattern emerged regarding the link between proprioceptive ability and physical function. Future studies in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis should i) move away from simple measures of association to infer causation given that several interrelated and potentially confounding deficits co-exist and ii) assess various aspects of proprioception, including high-level proprioception, as they differentially contribute to physical function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00088.2025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00088.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The relation between proprioceptive ability and physical function in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.
The relationship between proprioceptive ability and physical function is commonly assessed in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis to investigate the aetiology of functional deficits. The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the magnitude of this association in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis. We also investigated whether the magnitude of these associations was influenced by i) study sample size, ii) the pairing of body regions targeted by assessments of proprioceptive ability and physical function, iii) the proprioceptive sense assessed, and iv) the type of proprioceptive assessment (low-level proprioception; high-level proprioception). A total of 56 studies reporting 438 measures of association were included. The magnitude of the associations ranged from -0.31 to 0.93 (r and ρ), with 92% being positive (better proprioceptive ability associated with better physical function). Study sample size, pairing of assessments and type of low-level proprioceptive assessment (detect, discriminate, match) did not systematically influence the direction or magnitude of the associations. 97% of assessments focused on low-level proprioception and kinesthesia (position and movement sense). When studies discussed their measures of association, 50% used language that implied causality. Despite a detailed breakdown of measures of association, no clear pattern emerged regarding the link between proprioceptive ability and physical function. Future studies in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis should i) move away from simple measures of association to infer causation given that several interrelated and potentially confounding deficits co-exist and ii) assess various aspects of proprioception, including high-level proprioception, as they differentially contribute to physical function.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.