脑卒中、帕金森病和多发性硬化症患者本体感觉能力与身体功能的关系:系统综述

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Lucy S Robertson, Georgia Fisher, Joanna Diong, Annie A Butler, Simon C Gandevia, Martin E Héroux
{"title":"脑卒中、帕金森病和多发性硬化症患者本体感觉能力与身体功能的关系:系统综述","authors":"Lucy S Robertson, Georgia Fisher, Joanna Diong, Annie A Butler, Simon C Gandevia, Martin E Héroux","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00088.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationship between proprioceptive ability and physical function is commonly assessed in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis to investigate the aetiology of functional deficits. The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the magnitude of this association in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis. We also investigated whether the magnitude of these associations was influenced by i) study sample size, ii) the pairing of body regions targeted by assessments of proprioceptive ability and physical function, iii) the proprioceptive sense assessed, and iv) the type of proprioceptive assessment (low-level proprioception; high-level proprioception). A total of 56 studies reporting 438 measures of association were included. The magnitude of the associations ranged from -0.31 to 0.93 (r and ρ), with 92% being positive (better proprioceptive ability associated with better physical function). Study sample size, pairing of assessments and type of low-level proprioceptive assessment (detect, discriminate, match) did not systematically influence the direction or magnitude of the associations. 97% of assessments focused on low-level proprioception and kinesthesia (position and movement sense). When studies discussed their measures of association, 50% used language that implied causality. Despite a detailed breakdown of measures of association, no clear pattern emerged regarding the link between proprioceptive ability and physical function. Future studies in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis should i) move away from simple measures of association to infer causation given that several interrelated and potentially confounding deficits co-exist and ii) assess various aspects of proprioception, including high-level proprioception, as they differentially contribute to physical function.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relation between proprioceptive ability and physical function in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Lucy S Robertson, Georgia Fisher, Joanna Diong, Annie A Butler, Simon C Gandevia, Martin E Héroux\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/japplphysiol.00088.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The relationship between proprioceptive ability and physical function is commonly assessed in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis to investigate the aetiology of functional deficits. The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the magnitude of this association in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis. We also investigated whether the magnitude of these associations was influenced by i) study sample size, ii) the pairing of body regions targeted by assessments of proprioceptive ability and physical function, iii) the proprioceptive sense assessed, and iv) the type of proprioceptive assessment (low-level proprioception; high-level proprioception). A total of 56 studies reporting 438 measures of association were included. The magnitude of the associations ranged from -0.31 to 0.93 (r and ρ), with 92% being positive (better proprioceptive ability associated with better physical function). Study sample size, pairing of assessments and type of low-level proprioceptive assessment (detect, discriminate, match) did not systematically influence the direction or magnitude of the associations. 97% of assessments focused on low-level proprioception and kinesthesia (position and movement sense). When studies discussed their measures of association, 50% used language that implied causality. Despite a detailed breakdown of measures of association, no clear pattern emerged regarding the link between proprioceptive ability and physical function. Future studies in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis should i) move away from simple measures of association to infer causation given that several interrelated and potentially confounding deficits co-exist and ii) assess various aspects of proprioception, including high-level proprioception, as they differentially contribute to physical function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00088.2025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00088.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本体感觉能力与身体功能之间的关系通常在中风、帕金森病和多发性硬化症患者中进行评估,以研究功能缺陷的病因。本系统综述的主要目的是评估中风、帕金森病和多发性硬化症患者的这种关联程度。我们还研究了这些关联的大小是否受到以下因素的影响:(1)研究样本量,(2)本体感觉能力和身体功能评估所针对的身体区域的配对,(3)评估的本体感觉,(4)评估的本体感觉类型(低水平本体感觉;高层本体感觉)。共有56项研究报告了438项相关指标。相关性范围从-0.31到0.93 (r和ρ), 92%为阳性(更好的本体感觉能力与更好的身体功能相关)。研究样本量、配对评估和低级本体感觉评估类型(检测、区分、匹配)没有系统地影响关联的方向或大小。97%的评估集中在低级本体感觉和运动感(位置和运动感觉)。当研究讨论他们的关联测量时,50%的研究使用暗示因果关系的语言。尽管对相关措施进行了详细的分析,但本体感觉能力和身体功能之间的联系并没有明确的模式。未来对中风、帕金森氏病和多发性硬化症患者的研究应该i)从简单的关联测量转向推断因果关系,因为一些相互关联和潜在混淆的缺陷并存;ii)评估本体感觉的各个方面,包括高水平本体感觉,因为它们对身体功能有不同的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The relation between proprioceptive ability and physical function in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis: A systematic review.

The relationship between proprioceptive ability and physical function is commonly assessed in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis to investigate the aetiology of functional deficits. The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the magnitude of this association in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis. We also investigated whether the magnitude of these associations was influenced by i) study sample size, ii) the pairing of body regions targeted by assessments of proprioceptive ability and physical function, iii) the proprioceptive sense assessed, and iv) the type of proprioceptive assessment (low-level proprioception; high-level proprioception). A total of 56 studies reporting 438 measures of association were included. The magnitude of the associations ranged from -0.31 to 0.93 (r and ρ), with 92% being positive (better proprioceptive ability associated with better physical function). Study sample size, pairing of assessments and type of low-level proprioceptive assessment (detect, discriminate, match) did not systematically influence the direction or magnitude of the associations. 97% of assessments focused on low-level proprioception and kinesthesia (position and movement sense). When studies discussed their measures of association, 50% used language that implied causality. Despite a detailed breakdown of measures of association, no clear pattern emerged regarding the link between proprioceptive ability and physical function. Future studies in people with stroke, Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis should i) move away from simple measures of association to infer causation given that several interrelated and potentially confounding deficits co-exist and ii) assess various aspects of proprioception, including high-level proprioception, as they differentially contribute to physical function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信