左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架置入策略和影像学应用:来自15年登记的见解。

IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Judit Andreka, Fazila-Tun-Nesa Malik, Mariam Khandaker, Kalim Uddin, Abdul Kayum, Anass Maaroufi, Dan Prunea, Zoltan Ruzsa, Gabor G Toth
{"title":"左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗支架置入策略和影像学应用:来自15年登记的见解。","authors":"Judit Andreka, Fazila-Tun-Nesa Malik, Mariam Khandaker, Kalim Uddin, Abdul Kayum, Anass Maaroufi, Dan Prunea, Zoltan Ruzsa, Gabor G Toth","doi":"10.1080/14796678.2025.2511416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left main (LM) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains a major interventional challenge, with outcomes influenced by various patient- and procedure-related factors.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze procedural characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent LM PCI over a 15-year period in a single center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from all consecutive patients who underwent LM PCI between 2006 and 2022. Procedural details, with a focus on stenting technique, were collected. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 3494 patients were included. The majority (67%) presented with chronic coronary syndrome. Seventy-seven percent of all patients (n = 2690) underwent PCI by single stent (SS) strategy and 23% (n = 804) by double stent (DS) strategy. One-year mortality was significantly lower in SS cases compared to DS (3.5% vs. 5.1%, HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.96). Intravascular imaging was used in 17% of the cases but showed no significant difference in one-year mortality compared to angio-guided PCI (4.8% vs. 3.7%; HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.71-1.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In real-world LM PCI practice, patients for whom a provisional single-stent strategy was feasible had better outcomes than those requiring a double-stent approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":12589,"journal":{"name":"Future cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stenting strategy and imaging use in left main percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from a 15-year registry.\",\"authors\":\"Judit Andreka, Fazila-Tun-Nesa Malik, Mariam Khandaker, Kalim Uddin, Abdul Kayum, Anass Maaroufi, Dan Prunea, Zoltan Ruzsa, Gabor G Toth\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14796678.2025.2511416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left main (LM) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains a major interventional challenge, with outcomes influenced by various patient- and procedure-related factors.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze procedural characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent LM PCI over a 15-year period in a single center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from all consecutive patients who underwent LM PCI between 2006 and 2022. Procedural details, with a focus on stenting technique, were collected. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 3494 patients were included. The majority (67%) presented with chronic coronary syndrome. Seventy-seven percent of all patients (n = 2690) underwent PCI by single stent (SS) strategy and 23% (n = 804) by double stent (DS) strategy. One-year mortality was significantly lower in SS cases compared to DS (3.5% vs. 5.1%, HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.96). Intravascular imaging was used in 17% of the cases but showed no significant difference in one-year mortality compared to angio-guided PCI (4.8% vs. 3.7%; HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.71-1.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In real-world LM PCI practice, patients for whom a provisional single-stent strategy was feasible had better outcomes than those requiring a double-stent approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796678.2025.2511416\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796678.2025.2511416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:左主干(LM)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)仍然是一个主要的介入挑战,其结果受到各种患者和手术相关因素的影响。目的:分析单中心15年间行LM PCI患者的手术特点和结果。方法:我们回顾性分析了2006年至2022年间所有连续接受LM PCI的患者的数据。收集了手术细节,重点是支架置入技术。主要终点是1年时的全因死亡率。结果:共纳入3494例患者。大多数(67%)表现为慢性冠状动脉综合征。77%的患者(n = 2690)采用单支架(SS)策略,23% (n = 804)采用双支架(DS)策略。与DS相比,SS患者一年死亡率显著降低(3.5% vs. 5.1%, HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.96)。17%的病例使用了血管内显像,但与血管引导下的PCI相比,一年死亡率无显著差异(4.8% vs 3.7%;Hr 1.11, 95% ci 0.71-1.73)。结论:在现实的LM PCI实践中,临时单支架策略可行的患者比需要双支架方法的患者有更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stenting strategy and imaging use in left main percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from a 15-year registry.

Background: Left main (LM) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains a major interventional challenge, with outcomes influenced by various patient- and procedure-related factors.

Objectives: To analyze procedural characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent LM PCI over a 15-year period in a single center.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from all consecutive patients who underwent LM PCI between 2006 and 2022. Procedural details, with a focus on stenting technique, were collected. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 1 year.

Results: In total 3494 patients were included. The majority (67%) presented with chronic coronary syndrome. Seventy-seven percent of all patients (n = 2690) underwent PCI by single stent (SS) strategy and 23% (n = 804) by double stent (DS) strategy. One-year mortality was significantly lower in SS cases compared to DS (3.5% vs. 5.1%, HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.96). Intravascular imaging was used in 17% of the cases but showed no significant difference in one-year mortality compared to angio-guided PCI (4.8% vs. 3.7%; HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.71-1.73).

Conclusions: In real-world LM PCI practice, patients for whom a provisional single-stent strategy was feasible had better outcomes than those requiring a double-stent approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future cardiology
Future cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Research advances have contributed to improved outcomes across all specialties, but the rate of advancement in cardiology has been exceptional. Concurrently, the population of patients with cardiac conditions continues to grow and greater public awareness has increased patients" expectations of new drugs and devices. Future Cardiology (ISSN 1479-6678) reflects this new era of cardiology and highlights the new molecular approach to advancing cardiovascular therapy. Coverage will also reflect the major technological advances in bioengineering in cardiology in terms of advanced and robust devices, miniaturization, imaging, system modeling and information management issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信