Bichi Chen, Li Tian, Fuyue Tian, Qiaochu Yang, Ying Ruan, Ying Li, Min Cao, Chuanyan Wu, Maoyuan Yang, Suzhong Xu, Ruzhi Deng
{"title":"中国儿童睫状体麻痹屈光不正的机器学习预测。","authors":"Bichi Chen, Li Tian, Fuyue Tian, Qiaochu Yang, Ying Ruan, Ying Li, Min Cao, Chuanyan Wu, Maoyuan Yang, Suzhong Xu, Ruzhi Deng","doi":"10.3389/fcell.2025.1608494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate machine learning (ML) models for predicting cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction (SER) using non-cycloplegic parameters, addressing challenges in pediatric ophthalmic assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort of 2,274 Chinese children (4,548 eyes) aged 3∼16 years was stratified into development (<i>n</i> = 1819) and validation (<i>n</i> = 455) datasets. Six ML models (linear regression, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, multilayer perceptron, support vector machine, and light gradient boosting machine) were trained on demographics, non-cycloplegic refractive error, and ocular biometrics. Model performance was evaluated using <i>R</i> <sup><i>2</i></sup> , mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE), and clinical accuracy (proportions within ±0.50 D/±1.00 D).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the validation dataset, ML models predicted cycloplegic SER with high <i>R</i> <sup><i>2</i></sup> (0.920∼0.934), low ME (-0.004∼0.015 D) and MAE (0.385∼0.413 D). The multilayer perceptron model achieved the highest accuracy (<i>R</i> <sup><i>2</i></sup> = 0.934, MAE = 0.385 D), with 73.08% and 94.29% of predictions within ±0.50 D and ±1.00 D, respectively. Performance was optimal in children aged 7∼10 years (77.17∼79.70% within ±0.50 D) and those with low myopia (-3.00 to -0.50 D; 83.09∼83.56% within ±0.50 D). Non-cycloplegic measurements systematically overestimated myopia (mean difference: -0.39 ± 0.71 D, <i>P</i> < 0.001), particularly in younger children and hyperopic eyes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML models provide accurate estimates of cycloplegic SER using non-cycloplegic parameters, offering a practical alternative for pediatric refractive assessments when cycloplegia is infeasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":12448,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology","volume":"13 ","pages":"1608494"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12137252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning-driven prediction of cycloplegic refractive error in Chinese children.\",\"authors\":\"Bichi Chen, Li Tian, Fuyue Tian, Qiaochu Yang, Ying Ruan, Ying Li, Min Cao, Chuanyan Wu, Maoyuan Yang, Suzhong Xu, Ruzhi Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fcell.2025.1608494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate machine learning (ML) models for predicting cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction (SER) using non-cycloplegic parameters, addressing challenges in pediatric ophthalmic assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort of 2,274 Chinese children (4,548 eyes) aged 3∼16 years was stratified into development (<i>n</i> = 1819) and validation (<i>n</i> = 455) datasets. Six ML models (linear regression, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, multilayer perceptron, support vector machine, and light gradient boosting machine) were trained on demographics, non-cycloplegic refractive error, and ocular biometrics. Model performance was evaluated using <i>R</i> <sup><i>2</i></sup> , mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE), and clinical accuracy (proportions within ±0.50 D/±1.00 D).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the validation dataset, ML models predicted cycloplegic SER with high <i>R</i> <sup><i>2</i></sup> (0.920∼0.934), low ME (-0.004∼0.015 D) and MAE (0.385∼0.413 D). The multilayer perceptron model achieved the highest accuracy (<i>R</i> <sup><i>2</i></sup> = 0.934, MAE = 0.385 D), with 73.08% and 94.29% of predictions within ±0.50 D and ±1.00 D, respectively. Performance was optimal in children aged 7∼10 years (77.17∼79.70% within ±0.50 D) and those with low myopia (-3.00 to -0.50 D; 83.09∼83.56% within ±0.50 D). Non-cycloplegic measurements systematically overestimated myopia (mean difference: -0.39 ± 0.71 D, <i>P</i> < 0.001), particularly in younger children and hyperopic eyes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML models provide accurate estimates of cycloplegic SER using non-cycloplegic parameters, offering a practical alternative for pediatric refractive assessments when cycloplegia is infeasible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1608494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12137252/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2025.1608494\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2025.1608494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Machine learning-driven prediction of cycloplegic refractive error in Chinese children.
Objective: To develop and validate machine learning (ML) models for predicting cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction (SER) using non-cycloplegic parameters, addressing challenges in pediatric ophthalmic assessments.
Methods: A prospective cohort of 2,274 Chinese children (4,548 eyes) aged 3∼16 years was stratified into development (n = 1819) and validation (n = 455) datasets. Six ML models (linear regression, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, multilayer perceptron, support vector machine, and light gradient boosting machine) were trained on demographics, non-cycloplegic refractive error, and ocular biometrics. Model performance was evaluated using R2 , mean error (ME), mean absolute error (MAE), and clinical accuracy (proportions within ±0.50 D/±1.00 D).
Results: In the validation dataset, ML models predicted cycloplegic SER with high R2 (0.920∼0.934), low ME (-0.004∼0.015 D) and MAE (0.385∼0.413 D). The multilayer perceptron model achieved the highest accuracy (R2 = 0.934, MAE = 0.385 D), with 73.08% and 94.29% of predictions within ±0.50 D and ±1.00 D, respectively. Performance was optimal in children aged 7∼10 years (77.17∼79.70% within ±0.50 D) and those with low myopia (-3.00 to -0.50 D; 83.09∼83.56% within ±0.50 D). Non-cycloplegic measurements systematically overestimated myopia (mean difference: -0.39 ± 0.71 D, P < 0.001), particularly in younger children and hyperopic eyes.
Conclusion: ML models provide accurate estimates of cycloplegic SER using non-cycloplegic parameters, offering a practical alternative for pediatric refractive assessments when cycloplegia is infeasible.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology is a broad-scope, interdisciplinary open-access journal, focusing on the fundamental processes of life, led by Prof Amanda Fisher and supported by a geographically diverse, high-quality editorial board.
The journal welcomes submissions on a wide spectrum of cell and developmental biology, covering intracellular and extracellular dynamics, with sections focusing on signaling, adhesion, migration, cell death and survival and membrane trafficking. Additionally, the journal offers sections dedicated to the cutting edge of fundamental and translational research in molecular medicine and stem cell biology.
With a collaborative, rigorous and transparent peer-review, the journal produces the highest scientific quality in both fundamental and applied research, and advanced article level metrics measure the real-time impact and influence of each publication.