干扰是感觉运动适应中再学习衰减的基础。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
eNeuro Pub Date : 2025-06-26 Print Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0132-25.2025
Guy Avraham, Richard B Ivry
{"title":"干扰是感觉运动适应中再学习衰减的基础。","authors":"Guy Avraham, Richard B Ivry","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0132-25.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Savings refers to the gain in performance upon relearning. In sensorimotor adaptation, savings is tested by having participants adapt to perturbed feedback and, following a washout block during which the system resets to baseline, presenting the same perturbation again. While savings has been observed with these tasks, we have shown that the contribution from implicit adaptation, a process that uses errors to recalibrate the sensorimotor map, is attenuated upon relearning ( Avraham et al., 2021). Here, we test the hypothesis that this attenuation is due to interference arising from the different relationship between the movement and the feedback during washout. Removing the perturbation at the start of the washout block typically results in a salient error signal in the opposite direction to that observed during learning. We first replicated the finding that implicit adaptation is attenuated following a washout period that introduces salient opposite errors. When we eliminated feedback during washout, relearning was no longer attenuated, consistent with the interference hypothesis. Next, we created a scenario in which the perceived errors during washout were not salient, falling within the range of motor noise. Nonetheless, attenuation was still prominent. Inspired by this observation, we tested participants with an extended initial experience with veridical feedback and found that this was sufficient to attenuate adaptation during the first learning block. This effect was context specific and did not generalize to other movements. Taken together, the implicit sensorimotor adaptation system is highly sensitive to memory interference from a recent experience with a discrepant action-outcome contingency.</p>","PeriodicalId":11617,"journal":{"name":"eNeuro","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12203768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interference Underlies Attenuation upon Relearning in Sensorimotor Adaptation.\",\"authors\":\"Guy Avraham, Richard B Ivry\",\"doi\":\"10.1523/ENEURO.0132-25.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Savings refers to the gain in performance upon relearning. In sensorimotor adaptation, savings is tested by having participants adapt to perturbed feedback and, following a washout block during which the system resets to baseline, presenting the same perturbation again. While savings has been observed with these tasks, we have shown that the contribution from implicit adaptation, a process that uses errors to recalibrate the sensorimotor map, is attenuated upon relearning ( Avraham et al., 2021). Here, we test the hypothesis that this attenuation is due to interference arising from the different relationship between the movement and the feedback during washout. Removing the perturbation at the start of the washout block typically results in a salient error signal in the opposite direction to that observed during learning. We first replicated the finding that implicit adaptation is attenuated following a washout period that introduces salient opposite errors. When we eliminated feedback during washout, relearning was no longer attenuated, consistent with the interference hypothesis. Next, we created a scenario in which the perceived errors during washout were not salient, falling within the range of motor noise. Nonetheless, attenuation was still prominent. Inspired by this observation, we tested participants with an extended initial experience with veridical feedback and found that this was sufficient to attenuate adaptation during the first learning block. This effect was context specific and did not generalize to other movements. Taken together, the implicit sensorimotor adaptation system is highly sensitive to memory interference from a recent experience with a discrepant action-outcome contingency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eNeuro\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12203768/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eNeuro\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0132-25.2025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeuro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0132-25.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

节省是指重新学习后性能的提高。在感觉运动适应中,节省是通过让参与者适应扰动反馈来测试的,然后在系统重置到基线的冲洗块之后,再次呈现相同的扰动。虽然已经观察到这些任务的节省,但我们已经表明,内隐适应的贡献,一个使用错误重新校准感觉运动图的过程,在重新学习时减弱(Avraham等人,2021)。在这里,我们检验了这种衰减是由于在冲洗期间运动和反馈之间的不同关系引起的干扰的假设。在冲洗块开始时去除扰动通常会导致与学习过程中观察到的方向相反的显著误差信号。我们首先重复了这一发现,即内隐适应在引入显著相反错误的冲洗期后减弱。当我们在冲洗过程中消除反馈时,再学习不再减弱,与干扰假设一致。接下来,我们创建了一个场景,其中冲洗期间的感知误差不显著,落在电机噪声的范围内。尽管如此,衰减仍然很明显。受到这一观察结果的启发,我们对参与者进行了扩展的初始经验和真实反馈测试,发现这足以在第一个学习阶段减弱适应。这种影响是特定于环境的,并没有推广到其他运动。综上所述,内隐感觉运动适应系统对近期不同动作-结果偶合的记忆干扰高度敏感。“再学习”指的是以前学过的、但已经忘记的任务被重新引入的情况。通常,在重新学习的过程中,表现会更容易。一个例外是内隐适应,这是一个基于错误的过程,在这个过程中,感觉运动系统补偿外部扰动:对于内隐适应,重新学习被减弱,这一现象与运动学习模型不符,该模型假设错误敏感性随着练习而增加。在这里,我们证明了再学习时的衰减是竞争记忆之间干扰的结果。我们表明,当多个记忆与相似的运动相关联时,适应系统对干扰很敏感。事实上,干扰不仅局限于竞争性错误的记忆,而且在长期无干扰运动的初始学习经验中也可以观察到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Interference Underlies Attenuation upon Relearning in Sensorimotor Adaptation.

Interference Underlies Attenuation upon Relearning in Sensorimotor Adaptation.

Interference Underlies Attenuation upon Relearning in Sensorimotor Adaptation.

Interference Underlies Attenuation upon Relearning in Sensorimotor Adaptation.

Savings refers to the gain in performance upon relearning. In sensorimotor adaptation, savings is tested by having participants adapt to perturbed feedback and, following a washout block during which the system resets to baseline, presenting the same perturbation again. While savings has been observed with these tasks, we have shown that the contribution from implicit adaptation, a process that uses errors to recalibrate the sensorimotor map, is attenuated upon relearning ( Avraham et al., 2021). Here, we test the hypothesis that this attenuation is due to interference arising from the different relationship between the movement and the feedback during washout. Removing the perturbation at the start of the washout block typically results in a salient error signal in the opposite direction to that observed during learning. We first replicated the finding that implicit adaptation is attenuated following a washout period that introduces salient opposite errors. When we eliminated feedback during washout, relearning was no longer attenuated, consistent with the interference hypothesis. Next, we created a scenario in which the perceived errors during washout were not salient, falling within the range of motor noise. Nonetheless, attenuation was still prominent. Inspired by this observation, we tested participants with an extended initial experience with veridical feedback and found that this was sufficient to attenuate adaptation during the first learning block. This effect was context specific and did not generalize to other movements. Taken together, the implicit sensorimotor adaptation system is highly sensitive to memory interference from a recent experience with a discrepant action-outcome contingency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
eNeuro
eNeuro Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
486
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An open-access journal from the Society for Neuroscience, eNeuro publishes high-quality, broad-based, peer-reviewed research focused solely on the field of neuroscience. eNeuro embodies an emerging scientific vision that offers a new experience for authors and readers, all in support of the Society’s mission to advance understanding of the brain and nervous system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信