应用引导骨再生(GBR)原理改善侧颌缺损骨形成的双层双相磷酸钙骨替代物-临床前随机对照研究

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Kiri N Lang, Niklaus P Lang, Fernando M Muños Guzon, Nikola Saulacic
{"title":"应用引导骨再生(GBR)原理改善侧颌缺损骨形成的双层双相磷酸钙骨替代物-临床前随机对照研究","authors":"Kiri N Lang, Niklaus P Lang, Fernando M Muños Guzon, Nikola Saulacic","doi":"10.1111/clr.14460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the application of a synthetic bi-layered biphasic calcium-phosphate (BBCP) bone substitute for its capacity for new bone formation in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) in an acute-defect model in Beagle dogs.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Standardized bone defects were created following the extraction of the maxillary <sup>1</sup>P<sup>1</sup>, <sup>2</sup>P<sup>2</sup>, <sup>4</sup>P<sup>4</sup> and the mesial root of <sup>3</sup>P<sup>3</sup> in six Beagle dogs. The defects were treated according to the GBR principle using the tested material, synthetic bi-layered biphasic calcium-phosphate bone substitute (Group T), deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM, positive control = PC), a mixture of the test substance and DBBM in a ratio of 1:1 (Group M) and a sham-operated empty control (negative control = NC). The defects were covered with a resorbable collagen barrier membrane. Bone formation was evaluated radiologically, microtomographically, and histomorphometrically after 11 weeks of healing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All biomaterials resulted in increased volume of the augmented bone compared to the negative control. The augmented ridge volume developed to a greater extent in the tested area and in the combination of the tested bone substitute and the DBBM compared to the positive control alone (DBBM). A significant increment in a mineralized tissue and bone-biomaterial contact was observed between the test groups and the positive control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The synthetic BBCP appeared to result in greater bone formation volumes than the positive control (DBBM) and resulted in less contact with soft tissue. Hence, the tested material appeared to be at least as effective as the applied standard for lateral bone augmentation (DBBM).</p>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bi-Layered Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute to Improve Bone Formation in Lateral Jaw Defects Applying the Principle of Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)-A Pre-Clinical Randomized Controlled Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kiri N Lang, Niklaus P Lang, Fernando M Muños Guzon, Nikola Saulacic\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/clr.14460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the application of a synthetic bi-layered biphasic calcium-phosphate (BBCP) bone substitute for its capacity for new bone formation in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) in an acute-defect model in Beagle dogs.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Standardized bone defects were created following the extraction of the maxillary <sup>1</sup>P<sup>1</sup>, <sup>2</sup>P<sup>2</sup>, <sup>4</sup>P<sup>4</sup> and the mesial root of <sup>3</sup>P<sup>3</sup> in six Beagle dogs. The defects were treated according to the GBR principle using the tested material, synthetic bi-layered biphasic calcium-phosphate bone substitute (Group T), deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM, positive control = PC), a mixture of the test substance and DBBM in a ratio of 1:1 (Group M) and a sham-operated empty control (negative control = NC). The defects were covered with a resorbable collagen barrier membrane. Bone formation was evaluated radiologically, microtomographically, and histomorphometrically after 11 weeks of healing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All biomaterials resulted in increased volume of the augmented bone compared to the negative control. The augmented ridge volume developed to a greater extent in the tested area and in the combination of the tested bone substitute and the DBBM compared to the positive control alone (DBBM). A significant increment in a mineralized tissue and bone-biomaterial contact was observed between the test groups and the positive control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The synthetic BBCP appeared to result in greater bone formation volumes than the positive control (DBBM) and resulted in less contact with soft tissue. Hence, the tested material appeared to be at least as effective as the applied standard for lateral bone augmentation (DBBM).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14460\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14460","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价合成双层双相磷酸钙(BBCP)骨替代物在Beagle犬急性骨缺损诱导骨再生(GBR)中的应用。材料与方法:选取6只Beagle犬,拔除上颌1P1、2P2、4P4和3P3近中根,形成标准化骨缺损。采用实验材料、合成双层双相磷酸钙骨替代物(T组)、脱蛋白牛骨矿物质(DBBM,阳性对照= PC)、实验物质与DBBM按1:1的比例混合(M组)和假操作空对照(阴性对照= NC),按照GBR原理对缺陷进行处理。缺损被可吸收的胶原屏障膜覆盖。愈合11周后对骨形成进行放射学、显微层析成像和组织形态学评估。结果:与阴性对照相比,所有生物材料均增加了增强骨的体积。与单独的阳性对照(DBBM)相比,在测试区域和测试骨替代品与DBBM的组合中,增加的脊体积在更大程度上发展。在试验组和阳性对照之间观察到矿化组织和骨生物材料接触的显著增加。结论:与阳性对照(DBBM)相比,合成BBCP的骨形成体积更大,与软组织的接触更少。因此,测试材料似乎至少与侧向骨增强(DBBM)的应用标准一样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bi-Layered Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute to Improve Bone Formation in Lateral Jaw Defects Applying the Principle of Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)-A Pre-Clinical Randomized Controlled Study.

Aim: To evaluate the application of a synthetic bi-layered biphasic calcium-phosphate (BBCP) bone substitute for its capacity for new bone formation in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) in an acute-defect model in Beagle dogs.

Material and methods: Standardized bone defects were created following the extraction of the maxillary 1P1, 2P2, 4P4 and the mesial root of 3P3 in six Beagle dogs. The defects were treated according to the GBR principle using the tested material, synthetic bi-layered biphasic calcium-phosphate bone substitute (Group T), deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM, positive control = PC), a mixture of the test substance and DBBM in a ratio of 1:1 (Group M) and a sham-operated empty control (negative control = NC). The defects were covered with a resorbable collagen barrier membrane. Bone formation was evaluated radiologically, microtomographically, and histomorphometrically after 11 weeks of healing.

Results: All biomaterials resulted in increased volume of the augmented bone compared to the negative control. The augmented ridge volume developed to a greater extent in the tested area and in the combination of the tested bone substitute and the DBBM compared to the positive control alone (DBBM). A significant increment in a mineralized tissue and bone-biomaterial contact was observed between the test groups and the positive control.

Conclusions: The synthetic BBCP appeared to result in greater bone formation volumes than the positive control (DBBM) and resulted in less contact with soft tissue. Hence, the tested material appeared to be at least as effective as the applied standard for lateral bone augmentation (DBBM).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Clinical Oral Implants Research 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
11.60%
发文量
149
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信