在真实世界的数字乳房断层合成筛选程序中改进的乳腺癌检测与人工智能。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Joshua A Nepute, Meridith Peratikos, Alicia Y Toledano, John P Salvas, Haley Delks, Julie L Shisler, Jeffrey W Hoffmeister, Colleen M Madden
{"title":"在真实世界的数字乳房断层合成筛选程序中改进的乳腺癌检测与人工智能。","authors":"Joshua A Nepute, Meridith Peratikos, Alicia Y Toledano, John P Salvas, Haley Delks, Julie L Shisler, Jeffrey W Hoffmeister, Colleen M Madden","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2025.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to compare radiologists' breast cancer screening performance before and after the implementation of an artificial intelligence (AI) detection system for digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 4 radiologists reading DBT screening mammograms across 3 clinical sites during 2 distinct time periods. The pre-AI time period from September 1, 2018 to August 31, 2019 included 10,322 standard DBT interpretations with a computer-aided detection system. The post-AI from January 1 to March 18, 2020 and May 4 to December 31, 2020 included 6,407 DBT interpretations with concurrent use of a deep learning AI support system. Endpoints included cancer detection rate (CDR), abnormal interpretation rate (AIR), and positive predictive values for cancer among screenings with abnormal interpretation (PPV1) and biopsies performed (PPV3). Estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each radiologist were calculated for each time point and the difference across time periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CDR per 1000 exams increased from 3.7 without AI to 6.1 with AI (difference 2.4, P = .008, 95% CI: 0.6, 4.2). The AIR was 8.2% without AI and 6.5% with AI (difference -1.7, P < .001, 95% CI: -2.5, -0.8). The PPV1 increased from 4.2% to 8.8% with AI implementation (difference 4.6, P < .001, 95% CI: 3.0, 6.3) and PPV3 increased from 32.3% to 56.5% with AI support (difference 24.2, P = .033, 95% CI: 2.0, 46.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Real-world interpretation of DBT after implementation of an AI detection system resulted in increased CDR, reduced AIR, and significantly increased PPV1 and PPV3.</p>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved Breast Cancer Detection with Artificial Intelligence in a Real-World Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Program.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua A Nepute, Meridith Peratikos, Alicia Y Toledano, John P Salvas, Haley Delks, Julie L Shisler, Jeffrey W Hoffmeister, Colleen M Madden\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clbc.2025.05.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to compare radiologists' breast cancer screening performance before and after the implementation of an artificial intelligence (AI) detection system for digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 4 radiologists reading DBT screening mammograms across 3 clinical sites during 2 distinct time periods. The pre-AI time period from September 1, 2018 to August 31, 2019 included 10,322 standard DBT interpretations with a computer-aided detection system. The post-AI from January 1 to March 18, 2020 and May 4 to December 31, 2020 included 6,407 DBT interpretations with concurrent use of a deep learning AI support system. Endpoints included cancer detection rate (CDR), abnormal interpretation rate (AIR), and positive predictive values for cancer among screenings with abnormal interpretation (PPV1) and biopsies performed (PPV3). Estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each radiologist were calculated for each time point and the difference across time periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CDR per 1000 exams increased from 3.7 without AI to 6.1 with AI (difference 2.4, P = .008, 95% CI: 0.6, 4.2). The AIR was 8.2% without AI and 6.5% with AI (difference -1.7, P < .001, 95% CI: -2.5, -0.8). The PPV1 increased from 4.2% to 8.8% with AI implementation (difference 4.6, P < .001, 95% CI: 3.0, 6.3) and PPV3 increased from 32.3% to 56.5% with AI support (difference 24.2, P = .033, 95% CI: 2.0, 46.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Real-world interpretation of DBT after implementation of an AI detection system resulted in increased CDR, reduced AIR, and significantly increased PPV1 and PPV3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical breast cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical breast cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2025.05.007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2025.05.007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较实施数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)人工智能(AI)检测系统前后放射科医生的乳腺癌筛查表现。材料和方法:本回顾性研究包括4名放射科医生在2个不同的时间段阅读3个临床部位的DBT筛查乳房x线照片。从2018年9月1日到2019年8月31日,在人工智能之前的时间里,使用计算机辅助检测系统进行了10,322次标准DBT解释。2020年1月1日至3月18日和2020年5月4日至12月31日的后人工智能,包括6,407个DBT解释,并发使用深度学习人工智能支持系统。终点包括癌症检出率(CDR)、异常解释率(AIR)以及异常解释筛查(PPV1)和活检(PPV3)中癌症的阳性预测值。计算每个时间点每个放射科医生的估计值和95%置信区间(ci)以及不同时间段的差异。结果:每1000次检查的CDR从无人工智能的3.7增加到有人工智能的6.1(差异2.4,P = 0.008, 95% CI: 0.6, 4.2)。无AI的AIR为8.2%,有AI的AIR为6.5%(差异为-1.7,P < 0.001, 95% CI: -2.5, -0.8)。人工智能实施后,PPV1从4.2%增加到8.8%(差异4.6,P < 0.001, 95% CI: 3.0, 6.3), PPV3从32.3%增加到56.5%(差异24.2,P = 0.033, 95% CI: 2.0, 46.4)。结论:在实施AI检测系统后,DBT的真实世界解释导致CDR增加,AIR降低,PPV1和PPV3显着增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improved Breast Cancer Detection with Artificial Intelligence in a Real-World Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Program.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare radiologists' breast cancer screening performance before and after the implementation of an artificial intelligence (AI) detection system for digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT).

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 4 radiologists reading DBT screening mammograms across 3 clinical sites during 2 distinct time periods. The pre-AI time period from September 1, 2018 to August 31, 2019 included 10,322 standard DBT interpretations with a computer-aided detection system. The post-AI from January 1 to March 18, 2020 and May 4 to December 31, 2020 included 6,407 DBT interpretations with concurrent use of a deep learning AI support system. Endpoints included cancer detection rate (CDR), abnormal interpretation rate (AIR), and positive predictive values for cancer among screenings with abnormal interpretation (PPV1) and biopsies performed (PPV3). Estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each radiologist were calculated for each time point and the difference across time periods.

Results: The CDR per 1000 exams increased from 3.7 without AI to 6.1 with AI (difference 2.4, P = .008, 95% CI: 0.6, 4.2). The AIR was 8.2% without AI and 6.5% with AI (difference -1.7, P < .001, 95% CI: -2.5, -0.8). The PPV1 increased from 4.2% to 8.8% with AI implementation (difference 4.6, P < .001, 95% CI: 3.0, 6.3) and PPV3 increased from 32.3% to 56.5% with AI support (difference 24.2, P = .033, 95% CI: 2.0, 46.4).

Conclusion: Real-world interpretation of DBT after implementation of an AI detection system resulted in increased CDR, reduced AIR, and significantly increased PPV1 and PPV3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical breast cancer
Clinical breast cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
174
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信