规范临床采煤工作面自愿协助死亡:澳大利亚维多利亚州的一项定性访谈研究。

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Casey M Haining, Lindy Willmott, Ben P White
{"title":"规范临床采煤工作面自愿协助死亡:澳大利亚维多利亚州的一项定性访谈研究。","authors":"Casey M Haining, Lindy Willmott, Ben P White","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Voluntary assisted dying (VAD) in Victoria, Australia, is governed by a stringent legislative framework, designed and enforced by the state, as well as other forms of regulation. However, there remains limited understanding about how these various forms of regulation operate at the frontline or how clinicians themselves can influence regulation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This article explores how clinicians working at the frontline (clinical coalface) may influence the regulation of VAD in Victoria, and how this contributes to the safe and effective delivery of VAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Reflexive thematic analysis of 30 semistructured interviews with 37 'regulators' (defined as those capable of steering and guiding behaviour with respect to VAD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis resulted in the generation of three main themes: (1) coalface regulation extends regulations at the clinical level, ensuring adherence to laws while developing new standards and systems for safe and effective practice; (2) coalface regulation guides day-to-day VAD practice; and (3) coalface regulation plays a critical role in quality monitoring and improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians play a significant role in VAD regulation in Victoria and fulfil what we define as a 'coalface regulator' role. These coalface regulators are influential in ensuring the safe and effective delivery of VAD. Understanding how coalface regulation intersects with other forms of VAD regulation and how this regulatory influence can be harnessed is critical for optimising VAD regulation, safety and improving service delivery at a local and system level.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulating voluntary assisted dying at the clinical coalface: a qualitative interview study in Victoria, Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Casey M Haining, Lindy Willmott, Ben P White\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Voluntary assisted dying (VAD) in Victoria, Australia, is governed by a stringent legislative framework, designed and enforced by the state, as well as other forms of regulation. However, there remains limited understanding about how these various forms of regulation operate at the frontline or how clinicians themselves can influence regulation.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This article explores how clinicians working at the frontline (clinical coalface) may influence the regulation of VAD in Victoria, and how this contributes to the safe and effective delivery of VAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Reflexive thematic analysis of 30 semistructured interviews with 37 'regulators' (defined as those capable of steering and guiding behaviour with respect to VAD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analysis resulted in the generation of three main themes: (1) coalface regulation extends regulations at the clinical level, ensuring adherence to laws while developing new standards and systems for safe and effective practice; (2) coalface regulation guides day-to-day VAD practice; and (3) coalface regulation plays a critical role in quality monitoring and improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians play a significant role in VAD regulation in Victoria and fulfil what we define as a 'coalface regulator' role. These coalface regulators are influential in ensuring the safe and effective delivery of VAD. Understanding how coalface regulation intersects with other forms of VAD regulation and how this regulatory influence can be harnessed is critical for optimising VAD regulation, safety and improving service delivery at a local and system level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Quality & Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Quality & Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018314\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018314","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在澳大利亚维多利亚州,自愿协助死亡(VAD)受到严格的立法框架的管理,由国家设计和执行,以及其他形式的监管。然而,对于这些不同形式的监管如何在一线运作,以及临床医生自己如何影响监管,人们的理解仍然有限。目的:本文探讨临床医生在前线(临床煤面)工作如何影响维多利亚VAD的调节,以及这如何有助于安全有效地提供VAD。方法:对37名“监管者”(定义为能够在VAD方面指导和指导行为的人)进行30次半结构化访谈的反身性主题分析。结果:数据分析产生了三个主要主题:(1)采煤工作面监管扩展了临床层面的监管,确保遵守法律,同时为安全有效的实践制定新的标准和体系;(2)煤面整治指导VAD的日常实践;(3)煤层整治在质量监控和改善中起着至关重要的作用。结论:临床医生在维多利亚州的VAD调节中发挥着重要作用,并履行了我们所定义的“采煤面调节器”的作用。这些煤面监管机构对确保VAD的安全有效输送具有重要影响。了解采煤工作面监管如何与其他形式的VAD监管交叉,以及如何利用这种监管影响,对于优化VAD监管、安全以及改善地方和系统层面的服务提供至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regulating voluntary assisted dying at the clinical coalface: a qualitative interview study in Victoria, Australia.

Background: Voluntary assisted dying (VAD) in Victoria, Australia, is governed by a stringent legislative framework, designed and enforced by the state, as well as other forms of regulation. However, there remains limited understanding about how these various forms of regulation operate at the frontline or how clinicians themselves can influence regulation.

Objectives: This article explores how clinicians working at the frontline (clinical coalface) may influence the regulation of VAD in Victoria, and how this contributes to the safe and effective delivery of VAD.

Methods: Reflexive thematic analysis of 30 semistructured interviews with 37 'regulators' (defined as those capable of steering and guiding behaviour with respect to VAD).

Results: Data analysis resulted in the generation of three main themes: (1) coalface regulation extends regulations at the clinical level, ensuring adherence to laws while developing new standards and systems for safe and effective practice; (2) coalface regulation guides day-to-day VAD practice; and (3) coalface regulation plays a critical role in quality monitoring and improvement.

Conclusions: Clinicians play a significant role in VAD regulation in Victoria and fulfil what we define as a 'coalface regulator' role. These coalface regulators are influential in ensuring the safe and effective delivery of VAD. Understanding how coalface regulation intersects with other forms of VAD regulation and how this regulatory influence can be harnessed is critical for optimising VAD regulation, safety and improving service delivery at a local and system level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信