2020-2022年巴西某高脆弱性卫生区初级保健部门COVID-19检测策略评估

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sandra Garrido de Barros, Thais Regis Aranha Rossi, Ana Clara de Rebouças Carvalho, Denise Nogueira Cruz, Sisse Figueiredo de Santana, Camila Ramos Reis, Laio Magno, Inês Dourado, Ligia Maria Vieira-da-Silva
{"title":"2020-2022年巴西某高脆弱性卫生区初级保健部门COVID-19检测策略评估","authors":"Sandra Garrido de Barros, Thais Regis Aranha Rossi, Ana Clara de Rebouças Carvalho, Denise Nogueira Cruz, Sisse Figueiredo de Santana, Camila Ramos Reis, Laio Magno, Inês Dourado, Ligia Maria Vieira-da-Silva","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-23229-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Considering the potential role of primary health care (PHC) in the response to COVID-19, a formative evaluation (FE) was carried out between December 2021 and February 2022 to understand its work process against COVID-19 in a high-vulnerability health district in Brazil, identifying the difficulties in carrying out tests and the best practices for the implementation of the intervention \"Expansion of testing, quarantine, e-health and telemonitoring strategies to combat COVID-19 in Brazil\" (TQT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FEs are used to guide the implementation of health interventions. This FE was based on a situational diagnosis of the territories and PHC health units of the health district under study, with approximately 400,000 inhabitants, in which the TQT Project would later be implemented. A qualitative study was conducted based on 22 semistructured interviews and three focus groups (FGs) involving 19 PHC professionals. The interviews and FGs were analysed in terms of their thematic content.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a lack of coordination in implementing actions; COVID-19 testing was concentrated in a few PHC units, generating work overload and weakness of other health programs in these units; the health units' physical structure was inadequate, and human resources were insufficient; and no criteria were identified for defining the number of tests offered per day per unit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FE identified barriers to testing and supported the design of the TQT, including the adaptations needed to implement actions. The concentration of testing in a few units is an important barrier to access; it is suggested that testing actions should be deconcentrated in as many health units as possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"2101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the COVID-19 testing strategy in PHC of a high-vulnerability health district in Brazil, 2020-2022.\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Garrido de Barros, Thais Regis Aranha Rossi, Ana Clara de Rebouças Carvalho, Denise Nogueira Cruz, Sisse Figueiredo de Santana, Camila Ramos Reis, Laio Magno, Inês Dourado, Ligia Maria Vieira-da-Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12889-025-23229-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Considering the potential role of primary health care (PHC) in the response to COVID-19, a formative evaluation (FE) was carried out between December 2021 and February 2022 to understand its work process against COVID-19 in a high-vulnerability health district in Brazil, identifying the difficulties in carrying out tests and the best practices for the implementation of the intervention \\\"Expansion of testing, quarantine, e-health and telemonitoring strategies to combat COVID-19 in Brazil\\\" (TQT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FEs are used to guide the implementation of health interventions. This FE was based on a situational diagnosis of the territories and PHC health units of the health district under study, with approximately 400,000 inhabitants, in which the TQT Project would later be implemented. A qualitative study was conducted based on 22 semistructured interviews and three focus groups (FGs) involving 19 PHC professionals. The interviews and FGs were analysed in terms of their thematic content.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a lack of coordination in implementing actions; COVID-19 testing was concentrated in a few PHC units, generating work overload and weakness of other health programs in these units; the health units' physical structure was inadequate, and human resources were insufficient; and no criteria were identified for defining the number of tests offered per day per unit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FE identified barriers to testing and supported the design of the TQT, including the adaptations needed to implement actions. The concentration of testing in a few units is an important barrier to access; it is suggested that testing actions should be deconcentrated in as many health units as possible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"2101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23229-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23229-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:考虑到初级卫生保健(PHC)在应对COVID-19方面的潜在作用,在2021年12月至2022年2月期间开展了形成性评估(FE),以了解其在巴西一个高度脆弱的卫生地区抗击COVID-19的工作进程,确定开展检测的困难以及实施干预措施“扩大检测、检疫、电子卫生和远程监测战略,以在巴西抗击COVID-19”(TQT)的最佳做法。方法:采用FEs指导卫生干预措施的实施。这一评估是根据对所研究的约40万居民的各领土和初级保健单位的情况进行诊断得出的,在这些地区将实施全面培训期项目。对19名初级保健专业人员进行了22次半结构化访谈和3个焦点小组(FGs)的定性研究。对访谈和fg的主题内容进行了分析。结果:实施行动缺乏协调;COVID-19检测集中在少数初级保健单位,造成这些单位的工作超负荷和其他卫生项目的薄弱;卫生单位实体结构不健全,人力资源不足;并且没有确定标准来定义每个单位每天提供的测试数量。结论:FE确定了测试的障碍,并支持TQT的设计,包括实施行动所需的适应。测试集中在少数几个单位是获得的一个重要障碍;建议将检测行动分散到尽可能多的卫生单位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the COVID-19 testing strategy in PHC of a high-vulnerability health district in Brazil, 2020-2022.

Background: Considering the potential role of primary health care (PHC) in the response to COVID-19, a formative evaluation (FE) was carried out between December 2021 and February 2022 to understand its work process against COVID-19 in a high-vulnerability health district in Brazil, identifying the difficulties in carrying out tests and the best practices for the implementation of the intervention "Expansion of testing, quarantine, e-health and telemonitoring strategies to combat COVID-19 in Brazil" (TQT).

Methods: FEs are used to guide the implementation of health interventions. This FE was based on a situational diagnosis of the territories and PHC health units of the health district under study, with approximately 400,000 inhabitants, in which the TQT Project would later be implemented. A qualitative study was conducted based on 22 semistructured interviews and three focus groups (FGs) involving 19 PHC professionals. The interviews and FGs were analysed in terms of their thematic content.

Results: There was a lack of coordination in implementing actions; COVID-19 testing was concentrated in a few PHC units, generating work overload and weakness of other health programs in these units; the health units' physical structure was inadequate, and human resources were insufficient; and no criteria were identified for defining the number of tests offered per day per unit.

Conclusions: The FE identified barriers to testing and supported the design of the TQT, including the adaptations needed to implement actions. The concentration of testing in a few units is an important barrier to access; it is suggested that testing actions should be deconcentrated in as many health units as possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信