来自瑞士的证据:单语者比多语者从执行功能训练中获益更多

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Ebru Ger, Svenja Cibien, Claudia M. Roebers
{"title":"来自瑞士的证据:单语者比多语者从执行功能训练中获益更多","authors":"Ebru Ger,&nbsp;Svenja Cibien,&nbsp;Claudia M. Roebers","doi":"10.1002/acp.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study addressed potential differential effects of EF training as a function of language background. Training monolingual children with EF-fostering challenges and feedback may support them more than multilinguals, who face comparable challenges when switching languages. We assessed monolingual (<i>n</i> = 110) and multilingual (<i>n</i> = 91) 6-year-olds from Switzerland (<i>N</i><sub>total</sub> = 201, 101 female) for inhibition and shifting pre- and post-training using the Hearts and Flowers task. Children were assigned to one of three conditions: training on an EF task with feedback (<i>n</i> = 68), without feedback (<i>n</i> = 68), or on a control learning task (<i>n</i> = 65) for 12 sessions over 6–8 weeks. Results showed no differences between monolingual and multilingual children at T1. At T2, however, monolinguals outperformed multilinguals in inhibition with feedback and in shifting without feedback. Overall, monolinguals showed greater improvement than multilinguals. These results suggest monolingual children may benefit more from EF training, highlighting the need for tailored programs for monolingual and multilingual children.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48281,"journal":{"name":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","volume":"39 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monolinguals Benefit More From Executive Function Training Than Multilinguals: Evidence From Switzerland\",\"authors\":\"Ebru Ger,&nbsp;Svenja Cibien,&nbsp;Claudia M. Roebers\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acp.70073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This study addressed potential differential effects of EF training as a function of language background. Training monolingual children with EF-fostering challenges and feedback may support them more than multilinguals, who face comparable challenges when switching languages. We assessed monolingual (<i>n</i> = 110) and multilingual (<i>n</i> = 91) 6-year-olds from Switzerland (<i>N</i><sub>total</sub> = 201, 101 female) for inhibition and shifting pre- and post-training using the Hearts and Flowers task. Children were assigned to one of three conditions: training on an EF task with feedback (<i>n</i> = 68), without feedback (<i>n</i> = 68), or on a control learning task (<i>n</i> = 65) for 12 sessions over 6–8 weeks. Results showed no differences between monolingual and multilingual children at T1. At T2, however, monolinguals outperformed multilinguals in inhibition with feedback and in shifting without feedback. Overall, monolinguals showed greater improvement than multilinguals. These results suggest monolingual children may benefit more from EF training, highlighting the need for tailored programs for monolingual and multilingual children.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Cognitive Psychology\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Cognitive Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acp.70073\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acp.70073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了英语培训作为语言背景函数的潜在差异效应。与多语儿童相比,用培养ef的挑战和反馈来训练单语儿童可能对他们更有帮助,多语儿童在转换语言时面临类似的挑战。我们评估了来自瑞士的单语儿童(n = 110)和多语儿童(n = 91) (Ntotal = 201, 101名女性)在训练前和训练后的抑制和转移。儿童被分配到三种条件中的一种:有反馈的EF任务训练(n = 68),没有反馈的EF任务训练(n = 68),或控制学习任务训练(n = 65),为期6-8周,共12次。结果显示单语和多语儿童在T1时无差异。然而,在T2时,单语者在有反馈的抑制和无反馈的转移方面表现优于多语者。总的来说,单语者比多语者表现出更大的改善。这些结果表明,单语儿童可能从EF培训中受益更多,这突出了为单语和多语儿童量身定制课程的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Monolinguals Benefit More From Executive Function Training Than Multilinguals: Evidence From Switzerland

This study addressed potential differential effects of EF training as a function of language background. Training monolingual children with EF-fostering challenges and feedback may support them more than multilinguals, who face comparable challenges when switching languages. We assessed monolingual (n = 110) and multilingual (n = 91) 6-year-olds from Switzerland (Ntotal = 201, 101 female) for inhibition and shifting pre- and post-training using the Hearts and Flowers task. Children were assigned to one of three conditions: training on an EF task with feedback (n = 68), without feedback (n = 68), or on a control learning task (n = 65) for 12 sessions over 6–8 weeks. Results showed no differences between monolingual and multilingual children at T1. At T2, however, monolinguals outperformed multilinguals in inhibition with feedback and in shifting without feedback. Overall, monolinguals showed greater improvement than multilinguals. These results suggest monolingual children may benefit more from EF training, highlighting the need for tailored programs for monolingual and multilingual children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Applied Cognitive Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Applied Cognitive Psychology seeks to publish the best papers dealing with psychological analyses of memory, learning, thinking, problem solving, language, and consciousness as they occur in the real world. Applied Cognitive Psychology will publish papers on a wide variety of issues and from diverse theoretical perspectives. The journal focuses on studies of human performance and basic cognitive skills in everyday environments including, but not restricted to, studies of eyewitness memory, autobiographical memory, spatial cognition, skill training, expertise and skilled behaviour. Articles will normally combine realistic investigations of real world events with appropriate theoretical analyses and proper appraisal of practical implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信