“男孩和女孩谁更努力?”儿童对数学和阅读所需努力的性别刻板印象

IF 3.2 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Bethany Lassetter, Natalie Hutchins, Vivian Liu, Natalie Toomajian, Sarah T. Lubienski, Andrei Cimpian
{"title":"“男孩和女孩谁更努力?”儿童对数学和阅读所需努力的性别刻板印象","authors":"Bethany Lassetter,&nbsp;Natalie Hutchins,&nbsp;Vivian Liu,&nbsp;Natalie Toomajian,&nbsp;Sarah T. Lubienski,&nbsp;Andrei Cimpian","doi":"10.1111/desc.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Our culture attributes women's and girls’ ability in mathematics and related domains to their efforts more so than men's and boys’—a stereotype that contributes to inequities in scientific and technical careers. Here, we provide the first investigation of this gender stereotype in children, examining its endorsement across a broad age range and assessing its links to student motivation. Specifically, we investigated 6- to 12-year-old US elementary school students’ stereotypes about how hard girls and boys have to work to be good at math and, as a comparison, reading (<i>N</i> = 246; 50% girls; 50% White, 19% Asian, 9% Multiracial, 6% Black). We also tested whether these stereotypes are related to children's self-efficacy, interest, and anxiety in math and reading, and whether these links differ in strength across age. Although we anticipated that, like US adults, children would stereotype girls as having to work harder than boys to be good at math, we found that—in line with previously documented gender ingroup biases—younger children reported that effort was <i>less</i> of a requirement for their own (vs. another) gender; this ingroup bias was absent among older children. However, consistent with our hypotheses, children who more strongly believed their own gender needed to work harder to be good in a subject also reported lower self-efficacy in that subject, and older children reported lower interest in it as well. The present research contributes to our understanding of how to effectively encourage student motivation in school.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"28 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Who Has to Work Harder, Girls or Boys?” Children's Gender Stereotypes About Required Effort in Math and Reading\",\"authors\":\"Bethany Lassetter,&nbsp;Natalie Hutchins,&nbsp;Vivian Liu,&nbsp;Natalie Toomajian,&nbsp;Sarah T. Lubienski,&nbsp;Andrei Cimpian\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/desc.70025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Our culture attributes women's and girls’ ability in mathematics and related domains to their efforts more so than men's and boys’—a stereotype that contributes to inequities in scientific and technical careers. Here, we provide the first investigation of this gender stereotype in children, examining its endorsement across a broad age range and assessing its links to student motivation. Specifically, we investigated 6- to 12-year-old US elementary school students’ stereotypes about how hard girls and boys have to work to be good at math and, as a comparison, reading (<i>N</i> = 246; 50% girls; 50% White, 19% Asian, 9% Multiracial, 6% Black). We also tested whether these stereotypes are related to children's self-efficacy, interest, and anxiety in math and reading, and whether these links differ in strength across age. Although we anticipated that, like US adults, children would stereotype girls as having to work harder than boys to be good at math, we found that—in line with previously documented gender ingroup biases—younger children reported that effort was <i>less</i> of a requirement for their own (vs. another) gender; this ingroup bias was absent among older children. However, consistent with our hypotheses, children who more strongly believed their own gender needed to work harder to be good in a subject also reported lower self-efficacy in that subject, and older children reported lower interest in it as well. The present research contributes to our understanding of how to effectively encourage student motivation in school.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Science\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.70025\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.70025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的文化将女性和女孩在数学和相关领域的能力归因于她们的努力,而不是男性和男孩——这种刻板印象导致了科学和技术职业的不平等。在这里,我们提供了对儿童性别刻板印象的首次调查,检查了它在广泛年龄范围内的认可,并评估了它与学生动机的联系。具体来说,我们调查了6至12岁的美国小学生对女孩和男孩必须努力学习才能学好数学和阅读的刻板印象(N = 246;50%的女孩;50%白人,19%亚洲人,9%多种族,6%黑人)。我们还测试了这些刻板印象是否与儿童在数学和阅读方面的自我效能感、兴趣和焦虑有关,以及这些联系在不同年龄之间的强度是否不同。虽然我们预料到,像美国成年人一样,孩子们会对女孩有刻板印象,认为女孩必须比男孩更努力才能学好数学,但我们发现——与之前记录的性别内群体偏见一致——年幼的孩子报告说,努力对他们自己(相对于另一个)性别的要求更低;这种内群体偏见在年龄较大的儿童中不存在。然而,与我们的假设一致的是,那些坚信自己的性别需要更加努力才能在某一学科上取得好成绩的孩子,在该学科上的自我效能感也较低,年龄较大的孩子对该学科的兴趣也较低。本研究有助于我们理解如何在学校有效地激发学生的学习动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Who Has to Work Harder, Girls or Boys?” Children's Gender Stereotypes About Required Effort in Math and Reading

Our culture attributes women's and girls’ ability in mathematics and related domains to their efforts more so than men's and boys’—a stereotype that contributes to inequities in scientific and technical careers. Here, we provide the first investigation of this gender stereotype in children, examining its endorsement across a broad age range and assessing its links to student motivation. Specifically, we investigated 6- to 12-year-old US elementary school students’ stereotypes about how hard girls and boys have to work to be good at math and, as a comparison, reading (N = 246; 50% girls; 50% White, 19% Asian, 9% Multiracial, 6% Black). We also tested whether these stereotypes are related to children's self-efficacy, interest, and anxiety in math and reading, and whether these links differ in strength across age. Although we anticipated that, like US adults, children would stereotype girls as having to work harder than boys to be good at math, we found that—in line with previously documented gender ingroup biases—younger children reported that effort was less of a requirement for their own (vs. another) gender; this ingroup bias was absent among older children. However, consistent with our hypotheses, children who more strongly believed their own gender needed to work harder to be good in a subject also reported lower self-efficacy in that subject, and older children reported lower interest in it as well. The present research contributes to our understanding of how to effectively encourage student motivation in school.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信