María Benito-Murcia , Eduardo García-Vicente , María Martín , Ana Pérez , David Risco , Juan Manuel Alonso Rodríguez , Francisco Soler , Marcos Pérez-López , María Prado Míguez-Santiyán , Salomé Martinez-Morcillo
{"title":"西班牙西部蜂蜡中的农药残留:对蜜蜂健康和养蜂生产力的毒理学风险","authors":"María Benito-Murcia , Eduardo García-Vicente , María Martín , Ana Pérez , David Risco , Juan Manuel Alonso Rodríguez , Francisco Soler , Marcos Pérez-López , María Prado Míguez-Santiyán , Salomé Martinez-Morcillo","doi":"10.1016/j.etap.2025.104744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The pesticide residues in beeswax pose a risk to bee health and hive productivity. This study analyzed 25 beeswax samples from apiaries across five regions in Extremadura, a key beekeeping area in Spain. Foundation wax samples were also sourced from three common suppliers to evaluate contamination at the origin. A multi-residue of 560 substances was performed using QuEChERS extraction, LC-MS, and GC-MS methods. The results revealed 18 insecticides, 7 fungicides, and 4 herbicides, including banned substances such as endrin (up to 218.57 µg/kg) and chlorfenvinphos (15–16 µg/kg). Acrinathrin (5.27–122 µg/kg) and tau-fluvalinate (6.5–138.79 µg/kg) were the most frequent residues. Foundation wax accumulated 16 pesticide residues, highlighting its potential as a source of contamination. Banned pesticides have also been detected. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring pesticide residues in commercial foundation waxes and assessing the impact of pesticide exposure from wax on beekeeping and human safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11775,"journal":{"name":"Environmental toxicology and pharmacology","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 104744"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pesticide residues in beeswax from Western Spain: Toxicological risk for bee health and beekeeping productivity\",\"authors\":\"María Benito-Murcia , Eduardo García-Vicente , María Martín , Ana Pérez , David Risco , Juan Manuel Alonso Rodríguez , Francisco Soler , Marcos Pérez-López , María Prado Míguez-Santiyán , Salomé Martinez-Morcillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.etap.2025.104744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The pesticide residues in beeswax pose a risk to bee health and hive productivity. This study analyzed 25 beeswax samples from apiaries across five regions in Extremadura, a key beekeeping area in Spain. Foundation wax samples were also sourced from three common suppliers to evaluate contamination at the origin. A multi-residue of 560 substances was performed using QuEChERS extraction, LC-MS, and GC-MS methods. The results revealed 18 insecticides, 7 fungicides, and 4 herbicides, including banned substances such as endrin (up to 218.57 µg/kg) and chlorfenvinphos (15–16 µg/kg). Acrinathrin (5.27–122 µg/kg) and tau-fluvalinate (6.5–138.79 µg/kg) were the most frequent residues. Foundation wax accumulated 16 pesticide residues, highlighting its potential as a source of contamination. Banned pesticides have also been detected. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring pesticide residues in commercial foundation waxes and assessing the impact of pesticide exposure from wax on beekeeping and human safety.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental toxicology and pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"117 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104744\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental toxicology and pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138266892500119X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental toxicology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138266892500119X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pesticide residues in beeswax from Western Spain: Toxicological risk for bee health and beekeeping productivity
The pesticide residues in beeswax pose a risk to bee health and hive productivity. This study analyzed 25 beeswax samples from apiaries across five regions in Extremadura, a key beekeeping area in Spain. Foundation wax samples were also sourced from three common suppliers to evaluate contamination at the origin. A multi-residue of 560 substances was performed using QuEChERS extraction, LC-MS, and GC-MS methods. The results revealed 18 insecticides, 7 fungicides, and 4 herbicides, including banned substances such as endrin (up to 218.57 µg/kg) and chlorfenvinphos (15–16 µg/kg). Acrinathrin (5.27–122 µg/kg) and tau-fluvalinate (6.5–138.79 µg/kg) were the most frequent residues. Foundation wax accumulated 16 pesticide residues, highlighting its potential as a source of contamination. Banned pesticides have also been detected. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring pesticide residues in commercial foundation waxes and assessing the impact of pesticide exposure from wax on beekeeping and human safety.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes the results of studies concerning toxic and pharmacological effects of (human and veterinary) drugs and of environmental contaminants in animals and man.
Areas of special interest are: molecular mechanisms of toxicity, biotransformation and toxicokinetics (including toxicokinetic modelling), molecular, biochemical and physiological mechanisms explaining differences in sensitivity between species and individuals, the characterisation of pathophysiological models and mechanisms involved in the development of effects and the identification of biological markers that can be used to study exposure and effects in man and animals.
In addition to full length papers, short communications, full-length reviews and mini-reviews, Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology will publish in depth assessments of special problem areas. The latter publications may exceed the length of a full length paper three to fourfold. A basic requirement is that the assessments are made under the auspices of international groups of leading experts in the fields concerned. The information examined may either consist of data that were already published, or of new data that were obtained within the framework of collaborative research programmes. Provision is also made for the acceptance of minireviews on (classes of) compounds, toxicities or mechanisms, debating recent advances in rapidly developing fields that fall within the scope of the journal.