通过PROG测试评估日本药学教育中的通用技能:一项试点研究

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Hiroshi Ohara , Keita Odanaka , Toshinori Ito , Shigeki Kisara , Kitae Ito , Naoto Nakagawa
{"title":"通过PROG测试评估日本药学教育中的通用技能:一项试点研究","authors":"Hiroshi Ohara ,&nbsp;Keita Odanaka ,&nbsp;Toshinori Ito ,&nbsp;Shigeki Kisara ,&nbsp;Kitae Ito ,&nbsp;Naoto Nakagawa","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The Progress Report On Generic Skills (PROG) test has been used to assess generic skills in a variety of educational programs in Japan. It categorizes generic skills as either literacy or competency. Literacy involves applying previously acquired knowledge, while competency includes proper interaction with the environment. We aimed to examine student progression using the PROG test through a pharmacy program from the first year through the fifth year.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Undergraduate student pharmacists undertook the PROG test three times: in their first year (July 2019), before their on-site clinical internship in the fifth year (May 2023), and after the five-month clinical internship (December 2023). The scores of the three tests were compared to assess the outcomes of the on-campus didactic education and those of the clinical internship.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the on-campus didactic education from the first year to the fifth year, both literacy and competency scores decreased (5.0 to 4.7, <em>p</em> = 0.468, <em>r</em> = 0.257; 2.4 to 1.9; <em>p</em> = 0.042, <em>r</em> = 0.693; respectively). During the clinical internship, on the other hand, the literacy improved (4.9 to 5.7; <em>p</em> = 0.009, <em>r</em> = 0.679) while the competency reduced (2.0 to 1.9; <em>p</em> = 0.773, r = not calculated).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The PROG test scores may reflect changes in students' generic skills through their education program, suggesting that it holds potential for evaluating educational outcomes and providing educators with feedback to improve the efficacy of their educational programs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"17 10","pages":"Article 102414"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating generic skills through the PROG test in Japanese pharmacy education: A pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Hiroshi Ohara ,&nbsp;Keita Odanaka ,&nbsp;Toshinori Ito ,&nbsp;Shigeki Kisara ,&nbsp;Kitae Ito ,&nbsp;Naoto Nakagawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cptl.2025.102414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The Progress Report On Generic Skills (PROG) test has been used to assess generic skills in a variety of educational programs in Japan. It categorizes generic skills as either literacy or competency. Literacy involves applying previously acquired knowledge, while competency includes proper interaction with the environment. We aimed to examine student progression using the PROG test through a pharmacy program from the first year through the fifth year.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Undergraduate student pharmacists undertook the PROG test three times: in their first year (July 2019), before their on-site clinical internship in the fifth year (May 2023), and after the five-month clinical internship (December 2023). The scores of the three tests were compared to assess the outcomes of the on-campus didactic education and those of the clinical internship.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the on-campus didactic education from the first year to the fifth year, both literacy and competency scores decreased (5.0 to 4.7, <em>p</em> = 0.468, <em>r</em> = 0.257; 2.4 to 1.9; <em>p</em> = 0.042, <em>r</em> = 0.693; respectively). During the clinical internship, on the other hand, the literacy improved (4.9 to 5.7; <em>p</em> = 0.009, <em>r</em> = 0.679) while the competency reduced (2.0 to 1.9; <em>p</em> = 0.773, r = not calculated).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The PROG test scores may reflect changes in students' generic skills through their education program, suggesting that it holds potential for evaluating educational outcomes and providing educators with feedback to improve the efficacy of their educational programs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning\",\"volume\":\"17 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 102414\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129725001352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877129725001352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通用技能进展报告(PROG)测试已被用于评估日本各种教育项目的通用技能。它将通用技能分为读写能力和胜任能力。识字包括应用先前获得的知识,而能力包括与环境的适当互动。我们的目标是通过一个药学项目,从第一年到第五年,使用PROG测试来检查学生的进步。方法本科药师在第一年(2019年7月)、第五年临床实习前(2023年5月)和临床实习5个月后(2023年12月)分别进行PROG测试。通过比较三个测试的得分来评估校园教学教育和临床实习的结果。结果在第一年到第五年的校内教学中,读写能力得分下降(5.0 ~ 4.7,p = 0.468, r = 0.257;2.4 ~ 1.9;P = 0.042, r = 0.693;分别)。另一方面,在临床实习期间,读写能力提高了(4.9到5.7;P = 0.009, r = 0.679),胜任力下降(2.0 ~ 1.9;P = 0.773, r =未计算)。结论PROG测试成绩可以反映学生在教育项目中普遍技能的变化,提示其具有评估教育成果和为教育工作者提供反馈以提高教育项目效果的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating generic skills through the PROG test in Japanese pharmacy education: A pilot study

Objective

The Progress Report On Generic Skills (PROG) test has been used to assess generic skills in a variety of educational programs in Japan. It categorizes generic skills as either literacy or competency. Literacy involves applying previously acquired knowledge, while competency includes proper interaction with the environment. We aimed to examine student progression using the PROG test through a pharmacy program from the first year through the fifth year.

Methods

Undergraduate student pharmacists undertook the PROG test three times: in their first year (July 2019), before their on-site clinical internship in the fifth year (May 2023), and after the five-month clinical internship (December 2023). The scores of the three tests were compared to assess the outcomes of the on-campus didactic education and those of the clinical internship.

Results

During the on-campus didactic education from the first year to the fifth year, both literacy and competency scores decreased (5.0 to 4.7, p = 0.468, r = 0.257; 2.4 to 1.9; p = 0.042, r = 0.693; respectively). During the clinical internship, on the other hand, the literacy improved (4.9 to 5.7; p = 0.009, r = 0.679) while the competency reduced (2.0 to 1.9; p = 0.773, r = not calculated).

Conclusion

The PROG test scores may reflect changes in students' generic skills through their education program, suggesting that it holds potential for evaluating educational outcomes and providing educators with feedback to improve the efficacy of their educational programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信