导航城市动态:解开加拿大交通脱碳政策的政治线索

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Mischa Young , Georges A. Tanguay , Adriane MacDonald , Ying Zhou , Angelina Giordano
{"title":"导航城市动态:解开加拿大交通脱碳政策的政治线索","authors":"Mischa Young ,&nbsp;Georges A. Tanguay ,&nbsp;Adriane MacDonald ,&nbsp;Ying Zhou ,&nbsp;Angelina Giordano","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.05.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transportation is one of the most emissions-intensive sectors and crucial in the fight against climate change. Reducing emissions requires understanding the factors influencing sustainable transportation. While prior research has examined political identity's role in shaping preferences for low-carbon transport, broader voting patterns remain underexplored. This study analyzes municipal climate actions alongside 2021 Canadian federal election results to assess four policy levers designed to shift transportation behaviours. Four key findings emerge: 1) left-leaning and larger municipalities favor voluntary actions to support fuel and modal shifts; 2) levers involving price signals or mandates are less frequently implemented across political ideologies and population sizes; 3) policies targeting fuel and modal shifts correlate positively with population size; and 4) the political spectrum is associated with modal shift policies but not fuel shift policies. These insights highlight the impact of political inclination and population size on adopting sustainable transportation policies. Municipal regulators should consider these factors in their planning efforts. The findings also suggest that strategies involving price signals or mandates may face resistance, highlighting the need for a more nuanced approach. Future research should investigate why these strategies are unpopular and explore ways to broaden the toolkit available to transportation planners.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"171 ","pages":"Pages 128-139"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating municipal dynamics: unraveling the political threads in Canadian transport decarbonization policies\",\"authors\":\"Mischa Young ,&nbsp;Georges A. Tanguay ,&nbsp;Adriane MacDonald ,&nbsp;Ying Zhou ,&nbsp;Angelina Giordano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.05.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Transportation is one of the most emissions-intensive sectors and crucial in the fight against climate change. Reducing emissions requires understanding the factors influencing sustainable transportation. While prior research has examined political identity's role in shaping preferences for low-carbon transport, broader voting patterns remain underexplored. This study analyzes municipal climate actions alongside 2021 Canadian federal election results to assess four policy levers designed to shift transportation behaviours. Four key findings emerge: 1) left-leaning and larger municipalities favor voluntary actions to support fuel and modal shifts; 2) levers involving price signals or mandates are less frequently implemented across political ideologies and population sizes; 3) policies targeting fuel and modal shifts correlate positively with population size; and 4) the political spectrum is associated with modal shift policies but not fuel shift policies. These insights highlight the impact of political inclination and population size on adopting sustainable transportation policies. Municipal regulators should consider these factors in their planning efforts. The findings also suggest that strategies involving price signals or mandates may face resistance, highlighting the need for a more nuanced approach. Future research should investigate why these strategies are unpopular and explore ways to broaden the toolkit available to transportation planners.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"171 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 128-139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25002082\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25002082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

交通运输是排放最密集的行业之一,对应对气候变化至关重要。减少排放需要了解影响可持续交通的因素。虽然之前的研究已经考察了政治身份在塑造低碳交通偏好方面的作用,但更广泛的投票模式仍未得到充分探索。本研究分析了城市气候行动以及2021年加拿大联邦选举结果,以评估旨在改变交通行为的四种政策杠杆。主要发现如下:1)左倾和较大的市政当局倾向于自愿行动,以支持燃料和模式的转变;2)涉及价格信号或指令的杠杆在政治意识形态和人口规模上的实施频率较低;3)针对燃料和模式转变的政策与人口规模呈正相关;4)政治光谱与模式转换政策有关,而与燃料转换政策无关。这些见解突出了政治倾向和人口规模对采用可持续交通政策的影响。市政管理者应该在规划工作中考虑这些因素。调查结果还表明,涉及价格信号或委托的策略可能会面临阻力,这突显出需要采取更细致入微的方法。未来的研究应该调查为什么这些策略不受欢迎,并探索扩大交通规划者可用的工具包的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating municipal dynamics: unraveling the political threads in Canadian transport decarbonization policies
Transportation is one of the most emissions-intensive sectors and crucial in the fight against climate change. Reducing emissions requires understanding the factors influencing sustainable transportation. While prior research has examined political identity's role in shaping preferences for low-carbon transport, broader voting patterns remain underexplored. This study analyzes municipal climate actions alongside 2021 Canadian federal election results to assess four policy levers designed to shift transportation behaviours. Four key findings emerge: 1) left-leaning and larger municipalities favor voluntary actions to support fuel and modal shifts; 2) levers involving price signals or mandates are less frequently implemented across political ideologies and population sizes; 3) policies targeting fuel and modal shifts correlate positively with population size; and 4) the political spectrum is associated with modal shift policies but not fuel shift policies. These insights highlight the impact of political inclination and population size on adopting sustainable transportation policies. Municipal regulators should consider these factors in their planning efforts. The findings also suggest that strategies involving price signals or mandates may face resistance, highlighting the need for a more nuanced approach. Future research should investigate why these strategies are unpopular and explore ways to broaden the toolkit available to transportation planners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信