环境空气中常用农药的沉降取样和土壤逸度技术评价

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ludovic Mayer , Lisa Melymuk , Jakub Vinkler , Petr Šenk , Marek Šudoma , Petra Přibylová , Céline Degrendele , Gerhard Lammel
{"title":"环境空气中常用农药的沉降取样和土壤逸度技术评价","authors":"Ludovic Mayer ,&nbsp;Lisa Melymuk ,&nbsp;Jakub Vinkler ,&nbsp;Petr Šenk ,&nbsp;Marek Šudoma ,&nbsp;Petra Přibylová ,&nbsp;Céline Degrendele ,&nbsp;Gerhard Lammel","doi":"10.1016/j.apr.2025.102606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The atmospheric fate of current-use pesticides (CUPs) is incompletely understood, and CUPs' air-surface mass exchange has hardly been investigated. In this study, we evaluated techniques to improve our understanding of CUPs’ depositions and volatilisation from soil. Simultaneous sampling of gas-phase air, particulate phase air, wet and dry depositions, soil, and air equilibrated with soil was conducted during the pesticide application season, followed by analysis of 46 CUPs (22 herbicides, 16 insecticides and 12 fungicides) common in European agriculture. CUP deposition fluxes observed suggest that dry deposition of most CUPs is more effective than wet deposition in central Europe. Potential soil fugacity derived from CUP concentration in soil indicated the significance of soil organic matter on the absorption and retention of CUPs in soil. Using a fugacity meter, empirical evidence for net volatilisation of CUPs including the high-risk pesticides chlorpyrifos and pendimethalin from a non-agricultural soil is found for the first time. This suggests that CUPs can be subject to multiple emission-deposition cycles, which enhances their long-range transport potential. More method refinements and field measurements are needed for a mechanistic understanding of diffusive soil-air exchange processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8604,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Pollution Research","volume":"16 9","pages":"Article 102606"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current-use pesticides in ambient air - evaluation of deposition sampling and soil fugacity techniques\",\"authors\":\"Ludovic Mayer ,&nbsp;Lisa Melymuk ,&nbsp;Jakub Vinkler ,&nbsp;Petr Šenk ,&nbsp;Marek Šudoma ,&nbsp;Petra Přibylová ,&nbsp;Céline Degrendele ,&nbsp;Gerhard Lammel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apr.2025.102606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The atmospheric fate of current-use pesticides (CUPs) is incompletely understood, and CUPs' air-surface mass exchange has hardly been investigated. In this study, we evaluated techniques to improve our understanding of CUPs’ depositions and volatilisation from soil. Simultaneous sampling of gas-phase air, particulate phase air, wet and dry depositions, soil, and air equilibrated with soil was conducted during the pesticide application season, followed by analysis of 46 CUPs (22 herbicides, 16 insecticides and 12 fungicides) common in European agriculture. CUP deposition fluxes observed suggest that dry deposition of most CUPs is more effective than wet deposition in central Europe. Potential soil fugacity derived from CUP concentration in soil indicated the significance of soil organic matter on the absorption and retention of CUPs in soil. Using a fugacity meter, empirical evidence for net volatilisation of CUPs including the high-risk pesticides chlorpyrifos and pendimethalin from a non-agricultural soil is found for the first time. This suggests that CUPs can be subject to multiple emission-deposition cycles, which enhances their long-range transport potential. More method refinements and field measurements are needed for a mechanistic understanding of diffusive soil-air exchange processes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atmospheric Pollution Research\",\"volume\":\"16 9\",\"pages\":\"Article 102606\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atmospheric Pollution Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1309104225002089\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1309104225002089","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当前使用的农药(CUPs)的大气命运尚不完全清楚,CUPs的空气-表面质量交换几乎没有被研究过。在这项研究中,我们评估了提高我们对土壤中CUPs沉积和挥发的理解的技术。在施用农药的季节,对气相空气、颗粒相空气、干湿沉积物、土壤和空气与土壤平衡进行了同步采样,随后对欧洲农业中常见的46种CUPs(22种除草剂、16种杀虫剂和12种杀菌剂)进行了分析。观测到的CUP沉积通量表明,在中欧,大多数CUP的干沉积比湿沉积更有效。由土壤中CUP浓度推导出的土壤潜在逸出度表明土壤有机质对CUP在土壤中的吸收和滞留具有重要意义。利用逸度计,首次从非农业土壤中发现了CUPs净挥发的经验证据,包括高风险农药毒死蜱和戊二甲基灵。这表明CUPs可能受到多个排放-沉积循环的影响,这增强了它们的远程运输潜力。为了对扩散的土壤-空气交换过程有一个机械的了解,需要更多的方法改进和实地测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current-use pesticides in ambient air - evaluation of deposition sampling and soil fugacity techniques
The atmospheric fate of current-use pesticides (CUPs) is incompletely understood, and CUPs' air-surface mass exchange has hardly been investigated. In this study, we evaluated techniques to improve our understanding of CUPs’ depositions and volatilisation from soil. Simultaneous sampling of gas-phase air, particulate phase air, wet and dry depositions, soil, and air equilibrated with soil was conducted during the pesticide application season, followed by analysis of 46 CUPs (22 herbicides, 16 insecticides and 12 fungicides) common in European agriculture. CUP deposition fluxes observed suggest that dry deposition of most CUPs is more effective than wet deposition in central Europe. Potential soil fugacity derived from CUP concentration in soil indicated the significance of soil organic matter on the absorption and retention of CUPs in soil. Using a fugacity meter, empirical evidence for net volatilisation of CUPs including the high-risk pesticides chlorpyrifos and pendimethalin from a non-agricultural soil is found for the first time. This suggests that CUPs can be subject to multiple emission-deposition cycles, which enhances their long-range transport potential. More method refinements and field measurements are needed for a mechanistic understanding of diffusive soil-air exchange processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Atmospheric Pollution Research
Atmospheric Pollution Research ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
256
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Pollution Research (APR) is an international journal designed for the publication of articles on air pollution. Papers should present novel experimental results, theory and modeling of air pollution on local, regional, or global scales. Areas covered are research on inorganic, organic, and persistent organic air pollutants, air quality monitoring, air quality management, atmospheric dispersion and transport, air-surface (soil, water, and vegetation) exchange of pollutants, dry and wet deposition, indoor air quality, exposure assessment, health effects, satellite measurements, natural emissions, atmospheric chemistry, greenhouse gases, and effects on climate change.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信