{"title":"沸腾流系统界面面积浓度模拟","authors":"Kelei Song, Takashi Hibiki","doi":"10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2025.109193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurately modeling the interfacial area concentration (IAC) or Sauter mean diameter (SMD) is critical for robust analyses of boiling two-phase flows. IAC is closely related to the void fraction (VF) and SMD, i.e., IAC = 6 × VF/SMD. Since reliable one-dimensional drift-flux correlations are available to predict VF, IAC can be determined, provided SMD is accurately predicted. This study introduced a new methodology that systematically developed an SMD model for boiling flows by incorporating bubble Reynolds number, viscosity number, VF, and density ratio as key parameters. The model validation was conducted for a wide range of flow conditions, consisting of both subcooled and saturated boiling flows (thermal equilibrium quality from −0.3 to 0.1), different channel geometries (circular pipes, subchannels, and annuli) and fluid media (water, R-113, and R-12), hydraulic diameters of 17.7–34.6 mm, superficial gas velocities of 0.01–2.4 m/s, superficial liquid velocities of 0.16–2.8 m/s, VF of 0.01–0.47, pressures of 0.10–2.7 MPa, mass fluxes of 150–3000 kg/m<sup>2</sup>s, and density ratios of 0.0006–0.17. The proposed model captured distinct behaviors of SMD against VF and demonstrated excellent predictive performance with good agreement between predictions and experimental data. The mean absolute percentage errors for SMD and IAC predictions were 19.0 % and 22.9 %, respectively, indicating their high reliability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":332,"journal":{"name":"International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 109193"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling interfacial area concentration for boiling flow systems\",\"authors\":\"Kelei Song, Takashi Hibiki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2025.109193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Accurately modeling the interfacial area concentration (IAC) or Sauter mean diameter (SMD) is critical for robust analyses of boiling two-phase flows. IAC is closely related to the void fraction (VF) and SMD, i.e., IAC = 6 × VF/SMD. Since reliable one-dimensional drift-flux correlations are available to predict VF, IAC can be determined, provided SMD is accurately predicted. This study introduced a new methodology that systematically developed an SMD model for boiling flows by incorporating bubble Reynolds number, viscosity number, VF, and density ratio as key parameters. The model validation was conducted for a wide range of flow conditions, consisting of both subcooled and saturated boiling flows (thermal equilibrium quality from −0.3 to 0.1), different channel geometries (circular pipes, subchannels, and annuli) and fluid media (water, R-113, and R-12), hydraulic diameters of 17.7–34.6 mm, superficial gas velocities of 0.01–2.4 m/s, superficial liquid velocities of 0.16–2.8 m/s, VF of 0.01–0.47, pressures of 0.10–2.7 MPa, mass fluxes of 150–3000 kg/m<sup>2</sup>s, and density ratios of 0.0006–0.17. The proposed model captured distinct behaviors of SMD against VF and demonstrated excellent predictive performance with good agreement between predictions and experimental data. The mean absolute percentage errors for SMD and IAC predictions were 19.0 % and 22.9 %, respectively, indicating their high reliability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer\",\"volume\":\"166 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735193325006190\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735193325006190","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modeling interfacial area concentration for boiling flow systems
Accurately modeling the interfacial area concentration (IAC) or Sauter mean diameter (SMD) is critical for robust analyses of boiling two-phase flows. IAC is closely related to the void fraction (VF) and SMD, i.e., IAC = 6 × VF/SMD. Since reliable one-dimensional drift-flux correlations are available to predict VF, IAC can be determined, provided SMD is accurately predicted. This study introduced a new methodology that systematically developed an SMD model for boiling flows by incorporating bubble Reynolds number, viscosity number, VF, and density ratio as key parameters. The model validation was conducted for a wide range of flow conditions, consisting of both subcooled and saturated boiling flows (thermal equilibrium quality from −0.3 to 0.1), different channel geometries (circular pipes, subchannels, and annuli) and fluid media (water, R-113, and R-12), hydraulic diameters of 17.7–34.6 mm, superficial gas velocities of 0.01–2.4 m/s, superficial liquid velocities of 0.16–2.8 m/s, VF of 0.01–0.47, pressures of 0.10–2.7 MPa, mass fluxes of 150–3000 kg/m2s, and density ratios of 0.0006–0.17. The proposed model captured distinct behaviors of SMD against VF and demonstrated excellent predictive performance with good agreement between predictions and experimental data. The mean absolute percentage errors for SMD and IAC predictions were 19.0 % and 22.9 %, respectively, indicating their high reliability.
期刊介绍:
International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer serves as a world forum for the rapid dissemination of new ideas, new measurement techniques, preliminary findings of ongoing investigations, discussions, and criticisms in the field of heat and mass transfer. Two types of manuscript will be considered for publication: communications (short reports of new work or discussions of work which has already been published) and summaries (abstracts of reports, theses or manuscripts which are too long for publication in full). Together with its companion publication, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, with which it shares the same Board of Editors, this journal is read by research workers and engineers throughout the world.