不同的髋关节-膝关节协调模式的个体与髋关节骨关节炎的测量环图

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Lingling Zhong , Jingyi Wu , Jiaqi Li , Ananda Sidarta , Jack Jiaqi Zhang , Patrick Wai-Hang Kwong
{"title":"不同的髋关节-膝关节协调模式的个体与髋关节骨关节炎的测量环图","authors":"Lingling Zhong ,&nbsp;Jingyi Wu ,&nbsp;Jiaqi Li ,&nbsp;Ananda Sidarta ,&nbsp;Jack Jiaqi Zhang ,&nbsp;Patrick Wai-Hang Kwong","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hip osteoarthritis (HOA), involving cartilage degeneration and altered load distribution, disrupts gait biomechanics. While joint coordination plays a key role in efficient walking, dynamic inter-joint coordination changes across HOA progression remain underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>Do inter-joint coordination patterns differ between healthy individuals and those with HOA? How does HOA severity affect inter-joint coordination, as analysed through hip-knee cyclograms and coupling angles?</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a publicly available dataset, we analyzed 78 healthy individuals and 96 HOA participants, categorized into three subgroups based on Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grade. The inter-joint coordination outcome measures included cyclograms perimeter, area, and coupling angle. ANCOVA (covariates: walking speed/weight/BMI) was conducted to examine differences in cyclogram area/perimeter between groups, while MANCOVA was performed to analyse differences in inter-joint coordination patterns between groups. Post-hoc comparison tests were performed where overall significance was observed using multiple t tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Cyclogram area, perimeter, and coupling angle differed significantly between healthy and HOA groups (all p &lt; 0.001), but not among HOA severity subgroups. Healthy individuals showed in-phase coordination pattern during mid-stance, whereas individuals with HOA displayed proximal coordination. In individuals with HOA, the coordination pattern shifted from proximal to anti-phase earlier than in healthy individuals during terminal stance and early pre-swing. No significant difference in coordination pattern during the swing phase was observed between healthy individuals and individuals with HOA.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Hip-knee coordination patterns may serve as a biomechanical marker of HOA-related gait dysfunction, offering a potential avenue for prompt intervention and management of the disease.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"121 ","pages":"Pages 217-224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinct hip–knee coordination patterns in individuals with hip osteoarthritis as measured by cyclograms\",\"authors\":\"Lingling Zhong ,&nbsp;Jingyi Wu ,&nbsp;Jiaqi Li ,&nbsp;Ananda Sidarta ,&nbsp;Jack Jiaqi Zhang ,&nbsp;Patrick Wai-Hang Kwong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.06.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hip osteoarthritis (HOA), involving cartilage degeneration and altered load distribution, disrupts gait biomechanics. While joint coordination plays a key role in efficient walking, dynamic inter-joint coordination changes across HOA progression remain underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>Do inter-joint coordination patterns differ between healthy individuals and those with HOA? How does HOA severity affect inter-joint coordination, as analysed through hip-knee cyclograms and coupling angles?</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a publicly available dataset, we analyzed 78 healthy individuals and 96 HOA participants, categorized into three subgroups based on Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grade. The inter-joint coordination outcome measures included cyclograms perimeter, area, and coupling angle. ANCOVA (covariates: walking speed/weight/BMI) was conducted to examine differences in cyclogram area/perimeter between groups, while MANCOVA was performed to analyse differences in inter-joint coordination patterns between groups. Post-hoc comparison tests were performed where overall significance was observed using multiple t tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Cyclogram area, perimeter, and coupling angle differed significantly between healthy and HOA groups (all p &lt; 0.001), but not among HOA severity subgroups. Healthy individuals showed in-phase coordination pattern during mid-stance, whereas individuals with HOA displayed proximal coordination. In individuals with HOA, the coordination pattern shifted from proximal to anti-phase earlier than in healthy individuals during terminal stance and early pre-swing. No significant difference in coordination pattern during the swing phase was observed between healthy individuals and individuals with HOA.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Hip-knee coordination patterns may serve as a biomechanical marker of HOA-related gait dysfunction, offering a potential avenue for prompt intervention and management of the disease.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gait & posture\",\"volume\":\"121 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 217-224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gait & posture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225002346\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225002346","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

髋关节骨关节炎(HOA),涉及软骨退变和负荷分布改变,破坏步态生物力学。虽然关节协调在高效行走中起着关键作用,但HOA进展过程中关节间动态协调的变化仍未得到充分研究。研究问题:关节间协调模式在健康个体和HOA患者之间是否不同?通过髋膝环图和耦合角分析HOA严重程度如何影响关节间协调?方法使用公开数据集,对78名健康个体和96名HOA参与者进行分析,根据Kellgren-Lawrence (KL)等级将其分为3个亚组。关节间协调结果测量包括环线周长、面积和耦合角。采用ANCOVA(协变量:步行速度/体重/BMI)分析两组间环纹面积/周长的差异,采用MANCOVA分析两组间关节间协调模式的差异。进行事后比较检验,使用多重t检验观察总体显著性。结果环图面积、周长和耦合角在健康组和HOA组之间差异有统计学意义(p均为 <; 0.001),但在HOA严重亚组之间差异无统计学意义。健康个体在中位时表现为同位协调模式,而HOA患者则表现为近端协调模式。在HOA个体中,在站立末期和前摆早期,协调模式从近端转向反位相的时间比健康个体早。健康个体和HOA个体在摇摆期的协调模式无显著差异。髋关节-膝关节协调模式可能作为hoa相关步态功能障碍的生物力学标志,为及时干预和治疗该病提供了潜在的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distinct hip–knee coordination patterns in individuals with hip osteoarthritis as measured by cyclograms

Background

Hip osteoarthritis (HOA), involving cartilage degeneration and altered load distribution, disrupts gait biomechanics. While joint coordination plays a key role in efficient walking, dynamic inter-joint coordination changes across HOA progression remain underexplored.

Research question

Do inter-joint coordination patterns differ between healthy individuals and those with HOA? How does HOA severity affect inter-joint coordination, as analysed through hip-knee cyclograms and coupling angles?

Methods

Using a publicly available dataset, we analyzed 78 healthy individuals and 96 HOA participants, categorized into three subgroups based on Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grade. The inter-joint coordination outcome measures included cyclograms perimeter, area, and coupling angle. ANCOVA (covariates: walking speed/weight/BMI) was conducted to examine differences in cyclogram area/perimeter between groups, while MANCOVA was performed to analyse differences in inter-joint coordination patterns between groups. Post-hoc comparison tests were performed where overall significance was observed using multiple t tests.

Results

Cyclogram area, perimeter, and coupling angle differed significantly between healthy and HOA groups (all p < 0.001), but not among HOA severity subgroups. Healthy individuals showed in-phase coordination pattern during mid-stance, whereas individuals with HOA displayed proximal coordination. In individuals with HOA, the coordination pattern shifted from proximal to anti-phase earlier than in healthy individuals during terminal stance and early pre-swing. No significant difference in coordination pattern during the swing phase was observed between healthy individuals and individuals with HOA.

Significance

Hip-knee coordination patterns may serve as a biomechanical marker of HOA-related gait dysfunction, offering a potential avenue for prompt intervention and management of the disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gait & posture
Gait & posture 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
616
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance. The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信