主观老年疾患作为社区居住老年人残疾和死亡率的预测因素:一项5年队列研究

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Hajime Takechi, Akira Tsuzuki, Hiroshi Yoshino, Takenori Okumura, Yoshikiyo Kanada
{"title":"主观老年疾患作为社区居住老年人残疾和死亡率的预测因素:一项5年队列研究","authors":"Hajime Takechi, Akira Tsuzuki, Hiroshi Yoshino, Takenori Okumura, Yoshikiyo Kanada","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Various health-related concerns experienced daily by older adults, designated here as subjective geriatric complaints (SGCs), and are suspected to be early signs of the decline in quality of life (QOL). This study aims to test the hypothesis that SGCs are significant predictors of future disability and mortality among older adults. Methods This prospective cohort study was conducted in Japan. A health-related questionnaire was mailed to community-dwelling older adults, and data on the certification of long-term care needs and mortality that occurred over the subsequent 5 years were analysed. The analysis included 10 199 individuals. Thirteen SGCs were classified into six groups. The primary outcome was a composite end point of disability and mortality. Survival time analysis was conducted using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results The mean age (standard deviation) of participants (52.4% female) at baseline was 73.7 (6.0) years. Over the 5-year study period, 1793 participants (17.6%) were newly certified as requiring long-term care and 931 (9.1%) died. After adjusting for age, sex, depressive mood, and presence of multimorbidity, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for SGC 1b (circulatory/respiratory complaints) and SGC 3 (neurological complaints) were 1.558 (1.316–1.884, P < 0.001) and 1.355 (1.14–1.61, P = 0.001), respectively. Conclusion These findings suggest that SGCs are independent risk factors for a decline in QOL. Additionally, risk varied across different symptom groups within SGCs. These differences should be carefully considered in the management of health for older adults.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"2017 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subjective geriatric complaints as predictors of disability and mortality in community-dwelling older adults: a 5-year cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Hajime Takechi, Akira Tsuzuki, Hiroshi Yoshino, Takenori Okumura, Yoshikiyo Kanada\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ageing/afaf152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Various health-related concerns experienced daily by older adults, designated here as subjective geriatric complaints (SGCs), and are suspected to be early signs of the decline in quality of life (QOL). This study aims to test the hypothesis that SGCs are significant predictors of future disability and mortality among older adults. Methods This prospective cohort study was conducted in Japan. A health-related questionnaire was mailed to community-dwelling older adults, and data on the certification of long-term care needs and mortality that occurred over the subsequent 5 years were analysed. The analysis included 10 199 individuals. Thirteen SGCs were classified into six groups. The primary outcome was a composite end point of disability and mortality. Survival time analysis was conducted using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results The mean age (standard deviation) of participants (52.4% female) at baseline was 73.7 (6.0) years. Over the 5-year study period, 1793 participants (17.6%) were newly certified as requiring long-term care and 931 (9.1%) died. After adjusting for age, sex, depressive mood, and presence of multimorbidity, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for SGC 1b (circulatory/respiratory complaints) and SGC 3 (neurological complaints) were 1.558 (1.316–1.884, P < 0.001) and 1.355 (1.14–1.61, P = 0.001), respectively. Conclusion These findings suggest that SGCs are independent risk factors for a decline in QOL. Additionally, risk varied across different symptom groups within SGCs. These differences should be carefully considered in the management of health for older adults.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Age and ageing\",\"volume\":\"2017 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Age and ageing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf152\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年人每天经历的各种与健康相关的问题,在这里被称为主观老年投诉(SGCs),并被怀疑是生活质量(QOL)下降的早期迹象。本研究旨在验证SGCs是老年人未来残疾和死亡率的重要预测因子的假设。方法本前瞻性队列研究在日本进行。向居住在社区的老年人邮寄了一份与健康有关的问卷,并分析了长期护理需求证明和随后5年发生的死亡率数据。该分析包括10199人。13个SGCs分为6组。主要终点是残疾和死亡率的复合终点。生存时间分析采用Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox比例风险回归模型。结果基线时参与者的平均年龄(标准差)为73.7(6.0)岁,女性占52.4%。在5年的研究期间,1793名参与者(17.6%)被新认证为需要长期护理,931名(9.1%)死亡。在调整了年龄、性别、抑郁情绪和多病的存在后,SGC 1b(循环/呼吸疾病)和SGC 3(神经疾病)的风险比(95%置信区间)为1.558 (1.316-1.884),P &;0.001)和1.355 (1.14-1.61,P = 0.001)。结论SGCs是生活质量下降的独立危险因素。此外,sgc中不同症状组的风险也有所不同。在老年人健康管理中应仔细考虑这些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subjective geriatric complaints as predictors of disability and mortality in community-dwelling older adults: a 5-year cohort study
Background Various health-related concerns experienced daily by older adults, designated here as subjective geriatric complaints (SGCs), and are suspected to be early signs of the decline in quality of life (QOL). This study aims to test the hypothesis that SGCs are significant predictors of future disability and mortality among older adults. Methods This prospective cohort study was conducted in Japan. A health-related questionnaire was mailed to community-dwelling older adults, and data on the certification of long-term care needs and mortality that occurred over the subsequent 5 years were analysed. The analysis included 10 199 individuals. Thirteen SGCs were classified into six groups. The primary outcome was a composite end point of disability and mortality. Survival time analysis was conducted using Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results The mean age (standard deviation) of participants (52.4% female) at baseline was 73.7 (6.0) years. Over the 5-year study period, 1793 participants (17.6%) were newly certified as requiring long-term care and 931 (9.1%) died. After adjusting for age, sex, depressive mood, and presence of multimorbidity, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for SGC 1b (circulatory/respiratory complaints) and SGC 3 (neurological complaints) were 1.558 (1.316–1.884, P < 0.001) and 1.355 (1.14–1.61, P = 0.001), respectively. Conclusion These findings suggest that SGCs are independent risk factors for a decline in QOL. Additionally, risk varied across different symptom groups within SGCs. These differences should be carefully considered in the management of health for older adults.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信