在低资源环境中使用心理治疗与抗抑郁药物对初级保健中抑郁症的优化治疗:优化随机对照试验方案

Julia R Pozuelo, Anuja Lahiri, Rahul S P Singh, Arvind Kushwah, Mimansa Khanduri, Akanksha Shukla, Azaz Khan, Sruthi G, Varun Shende, Yashika Parashar, Yashwant K Mehra, Anant Bhan, Ronald C Kessler, Daisy R Singla, John A Naslund, Karmel Choi, Pim Cuijpers, Robert DeRubeis, Mohammad Herzallah, Chunling Lu, Jordan W Smoller, Tyler J VanderWeele, Abhijit Rozatkar, Michelle Melwyn Joel, Debasis Biswas, Shubham Atal, Umay Kulsum, Steven D Hollon, Vikram Patel
{"title":"在低资源环境中使用心理治疗与抗抑郁药物对初级保健中抑郁症的优化治疗:优化随机对照试验方案","authors":"Julia R Pozuelo, Anuja Lahiri, Rahul S P Singh, Arvind Kushwah, Mimansa Khanduri, Akanksha Shukla, Azaz Khan, Sruthi G, Varun Shende, Yashika Parashar, Yashwant K Mehra, Anant Bhan, Ronald C Kessler, Daisy R Singla, John A Naslund, Karmel Choi, Pim Cuijpers, Robert DeRubeis, Mohammad Herzallah, Chunling Lu, Jordan W Smoller, Tyler J VanderWeele, Abhijit Rozatkar, Michelle Melwyn Joel, Debasis Biswas, Shubham Atal, Umay Kulsum, Steven D Hollon, Vikram Patel","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6716211/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Psychotherapy and antidepressant medications are first-line treatments for depression, and they both have significant treatment effects on average. However, treatment response varies widely across patients, and neither approach is universally effective. Identifying the most effective treatment for each patient is critical everywhere, but particularly in low-resource settings where access to mental health care is limited. The Optimizing Depression (OptimizeD) trial aims to explore whether different patients respond differently to behavioral activation therapy versus antidepressant medication and if providing each patient with their optimal treatment improves outcomes in primary care. <b>Methods:</b> We plan to randomize 1,500 patients with moderate to severe depression (defined as a Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9] score ≥10) from primary healthcare settings in Bhopal, India, with equal allocation either to a culturally adapted behavioral activation therapy delivered by trained counselors (Healthy Activity Program) or to antidepressant medication (fluoxetine). Treatment will last 3 months, with remission (defined as PHQ-9 score <5) at 3 months as the primary endpoint. Using machine learning, we will attempt to develop a precision treatment rule that leverages baseline clinical, psychological, cognitive, socioeconomic, and biological data to predict which treatment is most likely to achieve remission for each patient. Cost-effectiveness analysis will then assess whether the added costs of optimizing treatment are justified by improvements in remission, recovery, and cost savings at the health system and societal levels. Secondary and exploratory objectives include assessing the effectiveness of optimization in a range of secondary outcomes, evaluating treatment mechanisms, and exploring whether incorporating genetic and biological markers as predictors improves treatment optimization. <b>Discussion:</b> The OptimizeD trial will evaluate whether baseline information collected in routine care can inform optimal depression treatment selection and identify predictors of nonresponse to facilitate timely specialist referrals. Findings have the potential to enhance personalized depression care in primary health systems, particularly in low-resource settings, with broader implications for global public health. <b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05944926; registered July 2, 2023) and Clinical Trials Registry India (CTRI/2024/01/061932; registered January 29, 2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":519972,"journal":{"name":"Research square","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12136744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Treatment for Depression in Primary Care Using Psychotherapy Versus Antidepressant Medication in a Low-Resource Setting: Protocol for the OptimizeD Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Julia R Pozuelo, Anuja Lahiri, Rahul S P Singh, Arvind Kushwah, Mimansa Khanduri, Akanksha Shukla, Azaz Khan, Sruthi G, Varun Shende, Yashika Parashar, Yashwant K Mehra, Anant Bhan, Ronald C Kessler, Daisy R Singla, John A Naslund, Karmel Choi, Pim Cuijpers, Robert DeRubeis, Mohammad Herzallah, Chunling Lu, Jordan W Smoller, Tyler J VanderWeele, Abhijit Rozatkar, Michelle Melwyn Joel, Debasis Biswas, Shubham Atal, Umay Kulsum, Steven D Hollon, Vikram Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6716211/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Psychotherapy and antidepressant medications are first-line treatments for depression, and they both have significant treatment effects on average. However, treatment response varies widely across patients, and neither approach is universally effective. Identifying the most effective treatment for each patient is critical everywhere, but particularly in low-resource settings where access to mental health care is limited. The Optimizing Depression (OptimizeD) trial aims to explore whether different patients respond differently to behavioral activation therapy versus antidepressant medication and if providing each patient with their optimal treatment improves outcomes in primary care. <b>Methods:</b> We plan to randomize 1,500 patients with moderate to severe depression (defined as a Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9] score ≥10) from primary healthcare settings in Bhopal, India, with equal allocation either to a culturally adapted behavioral activation therapy delivered by trained counselors (Healthy Activity Program) or to antidepressant medication (fluoxetine). Treatment will last 3 months, with remission (defined as PHQ-9 score <5) at 3 months as the primary endpoint. Using machine learning, we will attempt to develop a precision treatment rule that leverages baseline clinical, psychological, cognitive, socioeconomic, and biological data to predict which treatment is most likely to achieve remission for each patient. Cost-effectiveness analysis will then assess whether the added costs of optimizing treatment are justified by improvements in remission, recovery, and cost savings at the health system and societal levels. Secondary and exploratory objectives include assessing the effectiveness of optimization in a range of secondary outcomes, evaluating treatment mechanisms, and exploring whether incorporating genetic and biological markers as predictors improves treatment optimization. <b>Discussion:</b> The OptimizeD trial will evaluate whether baseline information collected in routine care can inform optimal depression treatment selection and identify predictors of nonresponse to facilitate timely specialist referrals. Findings have the potential to enhance personalized depression care in primary health systems, particularly in low-resource settings, with broader implications for global public health. <b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05944926; registered July 2, 2023) and Clinical Trials Registry India (CTRI/2024/01/061932; registered January 29, 2024).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research square\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12136744/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research square\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6716211/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research square","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6716211/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心理治疗和抗抑郁药物是治疗抑郁症的一线治疗方法,平均疗效显著。然而,不同患者的治疗反应差异很大,两种方法都不是普遍有效的。为每位患者确定最有效的治疗方法在任何地方都至关重要,特别是在资源匮乏、获得精神卫生保健的机会有限的环境中。优化抑郁(优化)试验旨在探索不同患者对行为激活疗法和抗抑郁药物的反应是否不同,以及为每个患者提供最佳治疗是否能改善初级保健的结果。方法:我们计划从印度博帕尔的初级卫生保健机构随机抽取1500名中度至重度抑郁症患者(定义为患者健康问卷[PHQ-9]得分≥10),平均分配给由训练有素的咨询师提供的文化适应行为激活疗法(健康活动计划)或抗抑郁药物(氟西汀)。讨论:优化试验将评估在常规护理中收集的基线信息是否可以为最佳抑郁症治疗选择提供信息,并确定无反应的预测因素,以促进及时的专科转诊。研究结果有可能加强初级卫生系统的个性化抑郁症护理,特别是在资源匮乏的环境中,对全球公共卫生具有更广泛的影响。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05944926;注册于2023年7月2日)和印度临床试验登记处(CTRI/2024/01/061932);2024年1月29日注册)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing Treatment for Depression in Primary Care Using Psychotherapy Versus Antidepressant Medication in a Low-Resource Setting: Protocol for the OptimizeD Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Psychotherapy and antidepressant medications are first-line treatments for depression, and they both have significant treatment effects on average. However, treatment response varies widely across patients, and neither approach is universally effective. Identifying the most effective treatment for each patient is critical everywhere, but particularly in low-resource settings where access to mental health care is limited. The Optimizing Depression (OptimizeD) trial aims to explore whether different patients respond differently to behavioral activation therapy versus antidepressant medication and if providing each patient with their optimal treatment improves outcomes in primary care. Methods: We plan to randomize 1,500 patients with moderate to severe depression (defined as a Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9] score ≥10) from primary healthcare settings in Bhopal, India, with equal allocation either to a culturally adapted behavioral activation therapy delivered by trained counselors (Healthy Activity Program) or to antidepressant medication (fluoxetine). Treatment will last 3 months, with remission (defined as PHQ-9 score <5) at 3 months as the primary endpoint. Using machine learning, we will attempt to develop a precision treatment rule that leverages baseline clinical, psychological, cognitive, socioeconomic, and biological data to predict which treatment is most likely to achieve remission for each patient. Cost-effectiveness analysis will then assess whether the added costs of optimizing treatment are justified by improvements in remission, recovery, and cost savings at the health system and societal levels. Secondary and exploratory objectives include assessing the effectiveness of optimization in a range of secondary outcomes, evaluating treatment mechanisms, and exploring whether incorporating genetic and biological markers as predictors improves treatment optimization. Discussion: The OptimizeD trial will evaluate whether baseline information collected in routine care can inform optimal depression treatment selection and identify predictors of nonresponse to facilitate timely specialist referrals. Findings have the potential to enhance personalized depression care in primary health systems, particularly in low-resource settings, with broader implications for global public health. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05944926; registered July 2, 2023) and Clinical Trials Registry India (CTRI/2024/01/061932; registered January 29, 2024).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信