康奈尔评估儿童谵妄:土耳其语翻译和验证。

Emel Uyar, Nurettin Onur Kutlu, Elif Akçay, Gülser Dinç, Merve Onat, Esra Koçkuzu, Yavuz Meral, Chani Traube
{"title":"康奈尔评估儿童谵妄:土耳其语翻译和验证。","authors":"Emel Uyar, Nurettin Onur Kutlu, Elif Akçay, Gülser Dinç, Merve Onat, Esra Koçkuzu, Yavuz Meral, Chani Traube","doi":"10.24953/turkjpediatr.2025.5237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypoactive delirium may go unrecognized unless routinely screened. At present, there is no valid screening tool for delirium in the Turkish language. This study was conducted to translate the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) into Turkish and to evaluate its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this is validation study, CAPD assessments were conducted by pediatric intensive care unit nurses and compared with assessments by a child psychiatrist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 76 patients were included, 37 participants (48.6%) were younger than 24 months, and 22 participants (28.9%) had developmental disabilities. Prevalence of delirium was 25.0% (n=19). Inter-rater agreement for the identification of delirium by psychiatrists was strong and reliable, with a Cohen's kappa value of 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.99). Inter-rater reliability for nurses was also significant, with a Cohen's kappa of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.57-0.91). Inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.64 to 0.84 for each CAPD item except item 6, indicating reliable scoring. Sensitivity and specificity improved when the CAPD cut-off score was increased from 9 (100% and 95%, respectively) to 11 (100% and 98.02%, respectively). Subgroup analyses showed high sensitivity and specificity in patients with developmental delay (96%) and in patients under 2 years of age (96%) when the CAPD cut-off score was 9. However, specificity decreased slightly to 93% in patients under 6 months of age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Turkish CAPD, the first delirium screening scale translated into Turkish, has demonstrated validity and reliability in screening for delirium in children of all ages, including those with developmental disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":101314,"journal":{"name":"The Turkish journal of pediatrics","volume":"67 2","pages":"221-229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium: Turkish translation and validation.\",\"authors\":\"Emel Uyar, Nurettin Onur Kutlu, Elif Akçay, Gülser Dinç, Merve Onat, Esra Koçkuzu, Yavuz Meral, Chani Traube\",\"doi\":\"10.24953/turkjpediatr.2025.5237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypoactive delirium may go unrecognized unless routinely screened. At present, there is no valid screening tool for delirium in the Turkish language. This study was conducted to translate the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) into Turkish and to evaluate its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this is validation study, CAPD assessments were conducted by pediatric intensive care unit nurses and compared with assessments by a child psychiatrist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 76 patients were included, 37 participants (48.6%) were younger than 24 months, and 22 participants (28.9%) had developmental disabilities. Prevalence of delirium was 25.0% (n=19). Inter-rater agreement for the identification of delirium by psychiatrists was strong and reliable, with a Cohen's kappa value of 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.99). Inter-rater reliability for nurses was also significant, with a Cohen's kappa of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.57-0.91). Inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.64 to 0.84 for each CAPD item except item 6, indicating reliable scoring. Sensitivity and specificity improved when the CAPD cut-off score was increased from 9 (100% and 95%, respectively) to 11 (100% and 98.02%, respectively). Subgroup analyses showed high sensitivity and specificity in patients with developmental delay (96%) and in patients under 2 years of age (96%) when the CAPD cut-off score was 9. However, specificity decreased slightly to 93% in patients under 6 months of age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Turkish CAPD, the first delirium screening scale translated into Turkish, has demonstrated validity and reliability in screening for delirium in children of all ages, including those with developmental disabilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Turkish journal of pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"67 2\",\"pages\":\"221-229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Turkish journal of pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjpediatr.2025.5237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Turkish journal of pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjpediatr.2025.5237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:低活动性谵妄可能无法识别,除非进行常规筛查。目前,尚无有效的土耳其语谵妄筛查工具。本研究旨在将康奈尔儿童谵妄评估(CAPD)翻译成土耳其语,并评估其效度和可靠性。方法:本研究是一项验证性研究,由儿科重症监护病房护士进行CAPD评估,并与儿童精神科医生的评估进行比较。结果:共纳入76例患者,其中年龄小于24个月的37例(48.6%),发育障碍22例(28.9%)。谵妄的患病率为25.0% (n=19)。精神病医生鉴定谵妄的评分间一致性很强且可靠,Cohen的kappa值为0.86(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.72-0.99)。护士的评估间信度也很显著,Cohen's kappa为0.74 (95% CI, 0.57-0.91)。除第6项外,CAPD各条目的信度范围为0.64 ~ 0.84,表明评分可靠。当CAPD分值从9分(分别为100%和95%)增加到11分(分别为100%和98.02%)时,敏感性和特异性均有所提高。亚组分析显示,当CAPD截止评分为9分时,发育迟缓患者(96%)和2岁以下患者(96%)具有较高的敏感性和特异性。然而,在6个月以下的患者中,特异性略有下降,为93%。结论:土耳其语CAPD是第一个翻译成土耳其语的谵妄筛查量表,在筛查包括发育障碍在内的所有年龄段儿童的谵妄方面具有有效性和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium: Turkish translation and validation.

Background: Hypoactive delirium may go unrecognized unless routinely screened. At present, there is no valid screening tool for delirium in the Turkish language. This study was conducted to translate the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) into Turkish and to evaluate its validity and reliability.

Methods: In this is validation study, CAPD assessments were conducted by pediatric intensive care unit nurses and compared with assessments by a child psychiatrist.

Results: A total of 76 patients were included, 37 participants (48.6%) were younger than 24 months, and 22 participants (28.9%) had developmental disabilities. Prevalence of delirium was 25.0% (n=19). Inter-rater agreement for the identification of delirium by psychiatrists was strong and reliable, with a Cohen's kappa value of 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.99). Inter-rater reliability for nurses was also significant, with a Cohen's kappa of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.57-0.91). Inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.64 to 0.84 for each CAPD item except item 6, indicating reliable scoring. Sensitivity and specificity improved when the CAPD cut-off score was increased from 9 (100% and 95%, respectively) to 11 (100% and 98.02%, respectively). Subgroup analyses showed high sensitivity and specificity in patients with developmental delay (96%) and in patients under 2 years of age (96%) when the CAPD cut-off score was 9. However, specificity decreased slightly to 93% in patients under 6 months of age.

Conclusion: The Turkish CAPD, the first delirium screening scale translated into Turkish, has demonstrated validity and reliability in screening for delirium in children of all ages, including those with developmental disabilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信