在影响双胞胎的rhd -溶血性疾病中涉及诊断困境的阻断D现象:病例报告和文献回顾

Abid Ali, Laxman Basany, G Naga Priyanka, Ravinder Reddy Lotkal
{"title":"在影响双胞胎的rhd -溶血性疾病中涉及诊断困境的阻断D现象:病例报告和文献回顾","authors":"Abid Ali, Laxman Basany, G Naga Priyanka, Ravinder Reddy Lotkal","doi":"10.24953/turkjpediatr.2025.5786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Rh blood group system is the most common cause of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Rh antigens are fully expressed at birth unlike ABO antigens which are weakly expressed. Sensitization to the D antigen can occur with exposure to < 0.1 mL of fetal blood. In rare cases of HDFN, these passively transferred IgG anti-D antibodies coat the D antigens on the newborn's red blood cells and interfere with the agglutination of D-positive red cells when tested with IgM anti-D typing reagents, resulting in false-negative Rh(D) typing. This \"blocked D phenomenon,\" can pose a diagnostic challenge.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>This case report describes twins with HDFN born to a Rh(D) negative mother. Both cord blood and neonatal blood were incorrectly typed as Rh(D) negative using routine typing reagents, creating a diagnostic dilemma. The combination of a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT), the mother's RhD-negative status, a positive indirect antiglobulin test (IAT), and discordant or unexpected RhD typing in the neonate raised suspicion of blocked D phenomenon. Paired samples from the parents and neonates were analysed. Following gentle heat elution at 45°C for 10 minutes, the neonatal red cells were re-typed as RhD positive using the conventional tube technique with monoclonal IgM anti-D. At the 6-month follow-up, both infants were phenotyped as O RhD positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The possibility of the blocking phenomenon should be considered while interpreting blood group results from fetal or neonatal samples in an alloimmunized pregnancy with potent antibodies. All pregnant women, regardless of their RhD type, should be tested for clinically significant unexpected serum antibodies during pregnancy. Elution methods help in identifying correct D antigen when Rh(D) typing gives uncertain results. Antiglobulin testing with anti-IgG should be performed to detect antibodies causing hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN).</p>","PeriodicalId":101314,"journal":{"name":"The Turkish journal of pediatrics","volume":"67 2","pages":"259-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blocked D phenomenon implicated in a diagnostic dilemma in RhD-hemolytic disease affecting twins: case report and review of literature.\",\"authors\":\"Abid Ali, Laxman Basany, G Naga Priyanka, Ravinder Reddy Lotkal\",\"doi\":\"10.24953/turkjpediatr.2025.5786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Rh blood group system is the most common cause of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Rh antigens are fully expressed at birth unlike ABO antigens which are weakly expressed. Sensitization to the D antigen can occur with exposure to < 0.1 mL of fetal blood. In rare cases of HDFN, these passively transferred IgG anti-D antibodies coat the D antigens on the newborn's red blood cells and interfere with the agglutination of D-positive red cells when tested with IgM anti-D typing reagents, resulting in false-negative Rh(D) typing. This \\\"blocked D phenomenon,\\\" can pose a diagnostic challenge.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>This case report describes twins with HDFN born to a Rh(D) negative mother. Both cord blood and neonatal blood were incorrectly typed as Rh(D) negative using routine typing reagents, creating a diagnostic dilemma. The combination of a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT), the mother's RhD-negative status, a positive indirect antiglobulin test (IAT), and discordant or unexpected RhD typing in the neonate raised suspicion of blocked D phenomenon. Paired samples from the parents and neonates were analysed. Following gentle heat elution at 45°C for 10 minutes, the neonatal red cells were re-typed as RhD positive using the conventional tube technique with monoclonal IgM anti-D. At the 6-month follow-up, both infants were phenotyped as O RhD positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The possibility of the blocking phenomenon should be considered while interpreting blood group results from fetal or neonatal samples in an alloimmunized pregnancy with potent antibodies. All pregnant women, regardless of their RhD type, should be tested for clinically significant unexpected serum antibodies during pregnancy. Elution methods help in identifying correct D antigen when Rh(D) typing gives uncertain results. Antiglobulin testing with anti-IgG should be performed to detect antibodies causing hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Turkish journal of pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"67 2\",\"pages\":\"259-267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Turkish journal of pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjpediatr.2025.5786\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Turkish journal of pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjpediatr.2025.5786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Rh血型系统是胎儿和新生儿溶血性疾病(hddn)的最常见原因。Rh抗原在出生时完全表达,而ABO抗原表达较弱。暴露于小于0.1 mL的胎儿血液中可发生对D抗原的致敏。在罕见的HDFN病例中,这些被动转移的IgG抗D抗体包裹在新生儿红细胞上的D抗原上,并在用IgM抗D分型试剂检测时干扰D阳性红细胞的凝集,导致假阴性Rh(D)分型。这种“阻断D现象”可能会给诊断带来挑战。病例介绍:本病例报告描述了Rh(D)阴性母亲所生的HDFN双胞胎。使用常规分型试剂,脐带血和新生儿血都被错误地分型为Rh(D)阴性,造成了诊断困境。直接抗球蛋白试验(DAT)阳性,母亲RhD阴性状态,间接抗球蛋白试验(IAT)阳性,新生儿RhD分型不一致或意外的组合引起了对阻断D现象的怀疑。对父母和新生儿的配对样本进行了分析。在45°C温和热洗脱10分钟后,使用常规试管技术用单克隆IgM anti-D将新生红细胞重新分型为RhD阳性。在6个月的随访中,两名婴儿表型均为O RhD阳性。结论:在对具有强效抗体的同种异体免疫妊娠的胎儿或新生儿样本进行血型分析时,应考虑阻断现象的可能性。所有孕妇,无论其RhD类型如何,都应在怀孕期间检测具有临床意义的意外血清抗体。当Rh(D)分型结果不确定时,洗脱方法有助于识别正确的D抗原。抗球蛋白试验与抗igg应进行检测抗体引起溶血性疾病的胎儿和新生儿(hddn)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blocked D phenomenon implicated in a diagnostic dilemma in RhD-hemolytic disease affecting twins: case report and review of literature.

Background: The Rh blood group system is the most common cause of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Rh antigens are fully expressed at birth unlike ABO antigens which are weakly expressed. Sensitization to the D antigen can occur with exposure to < 0.1 mL of fetal blood. In rare cases of HDFN, these passively transferred IgG anti-D antibodies coat the D antigens on the newborn's red blood cells and interfere with the agglutination of D-positive red cells when tested with IgM anti-D typing reagents, resulting in false-negative Rh(D) typing. This "blocked D phenomenon," can pose a diagnostic challenge.

Case presentation: This case report describes twins with HDFN born to a Rh(D) negative mother. Both cord blood and neonatal blood were incorrectly typed as Rh(D) negative using routine typing reagents, creating a diagnostic dilemma. The combination of a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT), the mother's RhD-negative status, a positive indirect antiglobulin test (IAT), and discordant or unexpected RhD typing in the neonate raised suspicion of blocked D phenomenon. Paired samples from the parents and neonates were analysed. Following gentle heat elution at 45°C for 10 minutes, the neonatal red cells were re-typed as RhD positive using the conventional tube technique with monoclonal IgM anti-D. At the 6-month follow-up, both infants were phenotyped as O RhD positive.

Conclusions: The possibility of the blocking phenomenon should be considered while interpreting blood group results from fetal or neonatal samples in an alloimmunized pregnancy with potent antibodies. All pregnant women, regardless of their RhD type, should be tested for clinically significant unexpected serum antibodies during pregnancy. Elution methods help in identifying correct D antigen when Rh(D) typing gives uncertain results. Antiglobulin testing with anti-IgG should be performed to detect antibodies causing hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信