第一代光子计数检测器CT造影剂体积对心肌细胞外体积测量精度的影响。

Takanori Kokawa, Satoshi Nakamura, Masafumi Takafuji, Akio Yamazaki, Hajime Sakuma, Kakuya Kitagawa
{"title":"第一代光子计数检测器CT造影剂体积对心肌细胞外体积测量精度的影响。","authors":"Takanori Kokawa, Satoshi Nakamura, Masafumi Takafuji, Akio Yamazaki, Hajime Sakuma, Kakuya Kitagawa","doi":"10.1007/s10554-025-03437-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) holds promise for cardiac CT imaging, including the measurement of extracellular volume (ECV), due to its advanced imaging capabilities. The study aimed to compare the protocols with and without additional contrast medium after coronary CT angiography (CCTA) by evaluating (1) the stability of subtraction method-based ECV (ECV<sub>SUB</sub>) across various keV images and (2) the correlation and agreement of ECV<sub>SUB</sub> with iodine map-based ECV (ECV<sub>IOD</sub>). Forty patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease were divided into two groups. In Protocol A (n = 20), only the standard contrast dose for CCTA was administered, while in Protocol B (n = 20), additional contrast medium was given after CCTA. The difference between the largest and smallest ECV<sub>SUB</sub> among multiple keV images was defined as the variability of ECV<sub>SUB</sub>. Correlations and agreement between the methods were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analyses. The mean variability in ECV<sub>SUB</sub> was significantly higher in Protocol A (3.8 ± 2.1) compared to Protocol B (2.1 ± 0.9) (p = 0.008). In Protocol A, the correlation between ECV<sub>SUB</sub> and ECV<sub>IOD</sub> was poor (r = 0.43, p = 0.059) with a low ICC of 0.40. In this group, Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 3.7 and limits of agreement from -9.4 to 16.8. In Protocol B, a stronger correlation was observed (r = 0.74, p < 0.001) with an ICC of 0.68. In this group, the mean difference was 2.8 with narrower limits of agreement (-4.8 to 10.4). Additional contrast medium is essential for stable myocardial ECV measurements using PCD-CT.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of contrast medium volume on myocardial extracellular volume measurement accuracy in first-generation photon-counting detector CT.\",\"authors\":\"Takanori Kokawa, Satoshi Nakamura, Masafumi Takafuji, Akio Yamazaki, Hajime Sakuma, Kakuya Kitagawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10554-025-03437-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) holds promise for cardiac CT imaging, including the measurement of extracellular volume (ECV), due to its advanced imaging capabilities. The study aimed to compare the protocols with and without additional contrast medium after coronary CT angiography (CCTA) by evaluating (1) the stability of subtraction method-based ECV (ECV<sub>SUB</sub>) across various keV images and (2) the correlation and agreement of ECV<sub>SUB</sub> with iodine map-based ECV (ECV<sub>IOD</sub>). Forty patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease were divided into two groups. In Protocol A (n = 20), only the standard contrast dose for CCTA was administered, while in Protocol B (n = 20), additional contrast medium was given after CCTA. The difference between the largest and smallest ECV<sub>SUB</sub> among multiple keV images was defined as the variability of ECV<sub>SUB</sub>. Correlations and agreement between the methods were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analyses. The mean variability in ECV<sub>SUB</sub> was significantly higher in Protocol A (3.8 ± 2.1) compared to Protocol B (2.1 ± 0.9) (p = 0.008). In Protocol A, the correlation between ECV<sub>SUB</sub> and ECV<sub>IOD</sub> was poor (r = 0.43, p = 0.059) with a low ICC of 0.40. In this group, Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 3.7 and limits of agreement from -9.4 to 16.8. In Protocol B, a stronger correlation was observed (r = 0.74, p < 0.001) with an ICC of 0.68. In this group, the mean difference was 2.8 with narrower limits of agreement (-4.8 to 10.4). Additional contrast medium is essential for stable myocardial ECV measurements using PCD-CT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-025-03437-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-025-03437-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

光子计数检测器CT (PCD-CT)由于其先进的成像能力,有望用于心脏CT成像,包括测量细胞外体积(ECV)。该研究旨在通过评估(1)基于减相法的ECV (ECVSUB)在各种keV图像上的稳定性,以及(2)ECVSUB与基于碘图的ECV (ECVIOD)的相关性和一致性,来比较冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)后添加和不添加造影剂的方案。40例已知或怀疑有冠状动脉疾病的患者分为两组。方案A (n = 20)只给予CCTA的标准造影剂,方案B (n = 20)在CCTA后给予额外的造影剂。将多幅keV图像中最大和最小ECVSUB的差异定义为ECVSUB的变异性。使用Pearson相关系数(r)、类内相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman分析评估方法之间的相关性和一致性。方案A的ECVSUB平均变异性(3.8±2.1)明显高于方案B(2.1±0.9)(p = 0.008)。在方案A中,ECVSUB与ECVIOD的相关性较差(r = 0.43, p = 0.059), ICC较低,为0.40。在该组中,Bland-Altman分析显示平均差异为3.7,一致性范围为-9.4至16.8。在方案B中,观察到更强的相关性(r = 0.74, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of contrast medium volume on myocardial extracellular volume measurement accuracy in first-generation photon-counting detector CT.

Photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) holds promise for cardiac CT imaging, including the measurement of extracellular volume (ECV), due to its advanced imaging capabilities. The study aimed to compare the protocols with and without additional contrast medium after coronary CT angiography (CCTA) by evaluating (1) the stability of subtraction method-based ECV (ECVSUB) across various keV images and (2) the correlation and agreement of ECVSUB with iodine map-based ECV (ECVIOD). Forty patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease were divided into two groups. In Protocol A (n = 20), only the standard contrast dose for CCTA was administered, while in Protocol B (n = 20), additional contrast medium was given after CCTA. The difference between the largest and smallest ECVSUB among multiple keV images was defined as the variability of ECVSUB. Correlations and agreement between the methods were assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman analyses. The mean variability in ECVSUB was significantly higher in Protocol A (3.8 ± 2.1) compared to Protocol B (2.1 ± 0.9) (p = 0.008). In Protocol A, the correlation between ECVSUB and ECVIOD was poor (r = 0.43, p = 0.059) with a low ICC of 0.40. In this group, Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 3.7 and limits of agreement from -9.4 to 16.8. In Protocol B, a stronger correlation was observed (r = 0.74, p < 0.001) with an ICC of 0.68. In this group, the mean difference was 2.8 with narrower limits of agreement (-4.8 to 10.4). Additional contrast medium is essential for stable myocardial ECV measurements using PCD-CT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信