Kendra Cooling, Danielle R Bouchard, Molly Gallibois, Jeffrey Hebert, Martin Sénéchal, Pamela Jarrett, Chris McGibbon, Emily Richard, Grant Handrigan
{"title":"站立，如果你可以——一个平行的，优势集群随机对照试验，以改善长期护理居民的步态速度。","authors":"Kendra Cooling, Danielle R Bouchard, Molly Gallibois, Jeffrey Hebert, Martin Sénéchal, Pamela Jarrett, Chris McGibbon, Emily Richard, Grant Handrigan","doi":"10.1016/j.jarlif.2025.100015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the effects of a standing intervention on gait speed for older adults living in long term care (LTC) residences.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A parallel superiority cluster randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>LTC residences. A total of 95 LTC residents (n = 47 control; n = 48 intervention) participated in the study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>LTC residences and therefore the residents from the homes were randomized to either the intervention group (standing up to 100 minutes/week) for 22 weeks or the control group (socializing with staff with no encouragement to stand for up to 100 minutes/week) for 22 weeks. The primary outcome is gait speed measured by the 10-meter walking speed test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 95 participants (n= 47 in the control group and n=48 in the intervention group) age 86 ± 8 years completed the trial, averaging 41.9 ± 30.3 min of standing per week in the intervention group and 48.4 ± 22.8 min of time matched activity in the control group. There was no significant difference between groups in changes in gait speed (β=-0.034, 95 % C.I. (-0.097 0.028)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>This 22-week standing intervention did not improve gait speed in older adults living in LTC residences.Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov - NCT03796039.</p>","PeriodicalId":73537,"journal":{"name":"JAR life","volume":"14 ","pages":"100015"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12136834/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stand if you can- A parallel, superiority cluster randomized controlled trial to improve gait speed for long term care residents.\",\"authors\":\"Kendra Cooling, Danielle R Bouchard, Molly Gallibois, Jeffrey Hebert, Martin Sénéchal, Pamela Jarrett, Chris McGibbon, Emily Richard, Grant Handrigan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jarlif.2025.100015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the effects of a standing intervention on gait speed for older adults living in long term care (LTC) residences.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A parallel superiority cluster randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>LTC residences. A total of 95 LTC residents (n = 47 control; n = 48 intervention) participated in the study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>LTC residences and therefore the residents from the homes were randomized to either the intervention group (standing up to 100 minutes/week) for 22 weeks or the control group (socializing with staff with no encouragement to stand for up to 100 minutes/week) for 22 weeks. The primary outcome is gait speed measured by the 10-meter walking speed test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 95 participants (n= 47 in the control group and n=48 in the intervention group) age 86 ± 8 years completed the trial, averaging 41.9 ± 30.3 min of standing per week in the intervention group and 48.4 ± 22.8 min of time matched activity in the control group. There was no significant difference between groups in changes in gait speed (β=-0.034, 95 % C.I. (-0.097 0.028)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>This 22-week standing intervention did not improve gait speed in older adults living in LTC residences.Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov - NCT03796039.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAR life\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"100015\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12136834/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAR life\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarlif.2025.100015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAR life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarlif.2025.100015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Stand if you can- A parallel, superiority cluster randomized controlled trial to improve gait speed for long term care residents.
Objective: To examine the effects of a standing intervention on gait speed for older adults living in long term care (LTC) residences.
Design: A parallel superiority cluster randomized controlled trial.
Setting and participants: LTC residences. A total of 95 LTC residents (n = 47 control; n = 48 intervention) participated in the study.
Methods: LTC residences and therefore the residents from the homes were randomized to either the intervention group (standing up to 100 minutes/week) for 22 weeks or the control group (socializing with staff with no encouragement to stand for up to 100 minutes/week) for 22 weeks. The primary outcome is gait speed measured by the 10-meter walking speed test.
Results: A total of 95 participants (n= 47 in the control group and n=48 in the intervention group) age 86 ± 8 years completed the trial, averaging 41.9 ± 30.3 min of standing per week in the intervention group and 48.4 ± 22.8 min of time matched activity in the control group. There was no significant difference between groups in changes in gait speed (β=-0.034, 95 % C.I. (-0.097 0.028)).
Conclusions and implications: This 22-week standing intervention did not improve gait speed in older adults living in LTC residences.Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov - NCT03796039.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
