改善安全和健康的人工智能驱动解决方案:REDECA框架在农业拖拉机驾驶员中的应用。

PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-06-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0003543
Negin Ashrafi, Sahar Yousefi, Guy Roger Aby, Salah F Issa, Houshang Darabi, Kamiar Alaei, Greg Placencia, Maryam Pishgar
{"title":"改善安全和健康的人工智能驱动解决方案:REDECA框架在农业拖拉机驾驶员中的应用。","authors":"Negin Ashrafi, Sahar Yousefi, Guy Roger Aby, Salah F Issa, Houshang Darabi, Kamiar Alaei, Greg Placencia, Maryam Pishgar","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0003543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite tremendous efforts, including research, teaching, and extension, toward improving the safety of agricultural tractor drivers, the number of incidents related to agricultural tractor drivers has not declined. This evidence points out an urgent need to explore artificial intelligence (AI) solutions to improve the safety of tractor drivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper uses 171 Fatality Assessment and Control Evaluation (FACE) reports related to tractor drivers and a new framework called Risk Evolution, Detection, Evaluation, and Control of Accidents (REDECA) to identify existing AI solutions, such as machine learning models for predictive maintenance, sensor-based monitoring, computer vision, and automated safety interventions, and specific areas where AI solutions are missed and can be developed to reduce incidents and recovery time. Fatality reports of tractor drivers were categorized into six main categories, including run over, pinned by/ Crushed and entanglement, fall, fire, roll over, and overturn. Each category was then subcategorized based on similarities of incident causes in the reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The application of the REDECA framework, which categorizes risk states into R1 (safe), R2 (hazard exposure), and R3 (incident), revealed potential AI solutions that could improve the safety of tractor drivers. In all categories, the REDECA framework lacks AI solutions for three elements, including the probability of reducing recovery time in R3, detecting changes between R2 and R3, and intervention to send workers to R2. Most of the categories were missing AI solutions for interventions to prevent entry to the R3 element of the REDECA. In addition, the fall, roll over, and overturn categories lacked AI intervention that minimized damage and recovery in R3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The outcome of this study shows an urgent need to develop AI solutions to improve tractor driver safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 6","pages":"e0003543"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI-driven solutions to improve safety and health: Application of the REDECA framework for agricultural tractor drivers.\",\"authors\":\"Negin Ashrafi, Sahar Yousefi, Guy Roger Aby, Salah F Issa, Houshang Darabi, Kamiar Alaei, Greg Placencia, Maryam Pishgar\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pgph.0003543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite tremendous efforts, including research, teaching, and extension, toward improving the safety of agricultural tractor drivers, the number of incidents related to agricultural tractor drivers has not declined. This evidence points out an urgent need to explore artificial intelligence (AI) solutions to improve the safety of tractor drivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper uses 171 Fatality Assessment and Control Evaluation (FACE) reports related to tractor drivers and a new framework called Risk Evolution, Detection, Evaluation, and Control of Accidents (REDECA) to identify existing AI solutions, such as machine learning models for predictive maintenance, sensor-based monitoring, computer vision, and automated safety interventions, and specific areas where AI solutions are missed and can be developed to reduce incidents and recovery time. Fatality reports of tractor drivers were categorized into six main categories, including run over, pinned by/ Crushed and entanglement, fall, fire, roll over, and overturn. Each category was then subcategorized based on similarities of incident causes in the reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The application of the REDECA framework, which categorizes risk states into R1 (safe), R2 (hazard exposure), and R3 (incident), revealed potential AI solutions that could improve the safety of tractor drivers. In all categories, the REDECA framework lacks AI solutions for three elements, including the probability of reducing recovery time in R3, detecting changes between R2 and R3, and intervention to send workers to R2. Most of the categories were missing AI solutions for interventions to prevent entry to the R3 element of the REDECA. In addition, the fall, roll over, and overturn categories lacked AI intervention that minimized damage and recovery in R3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The outcome of this study shows an urgent need to develop AI solutions to improve tractor driver safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS global public health\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"e0003543\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS global public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:尽管在研究、教学和推广等方面做出了巨大的努力,以提高农用拖拉机驾驶员的安全水平,但与农用拖拉机驾驶员有关的事故数量并没有减少。这一证据表明,迫切需要探索人工智能(AI)解决方案,以提高拖拉机司机的安全性。方法:本文使用了171份与拖拉机驾驶员相关的死亡评估和控制评估(FACE)报告,以及一个名为“事故风险演变、检测、评估和控制”(REDECA)的新框架,以确定现有的人工智能解决方案,例如用于预测性维护的机器学习模型、基于传感器的监控、计算机视觉和自动安全干预,以及人工智能解决方案被遗漏的特定领域,可以开发这些解决方案以减少事故和恢复时间。拖拉机司机的死亡报告分为六个主要类别,包括碾死、被压死和缠绕、坠落、着火、翻车和翻车。然后根据报告中事件原因的相似性对每个类别进行细分。结果:REDECA框架将风险状态分为R1(安全)、R2(危险暴露)和R3(事故),揭示了潜在的AI解决方案,可以提高拖拉机驾驶员的安全性。在所有类别中,REDECA框架缺乏三个要素的人工智能解决方案,包括减少R3中恢复时间的可能性,检测R2和R3之间的变化,以及将工人送到R2的干预。大多数类别都缺少人工智能解决方案,以防止进入REDECA的R3元素。此外,坠落、翻车和翻车类别缺乏人工智能干预,从而最大限度地减少了R3中的损失和恢复。结论:这项研究的结果表明,迫切需要开发人工智能解决方案来提高拖拉机驾驶员的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AI-driven solutions to improve safety and health: Application of the REDECA framework for agricultural tractor drivers.

Introduction: Despite tremendous efforts, including research, teaching, and extension, toward improving the safety of agricultural tractor drivers, the number of incidents related to agricultural tractor drivers has not declined. This evidence points out an urgent need to explore artificial intelligence (AI) solutions to improve the safety of tractor drivers.

Methods: This paper uses 171 Fatality Assessment and Control Evaluation (FACE) reports related to tractor drivers and a new framework called Risk Evolution, Detection, Evaluation, and Control of Accidents (REDECA) to identify existing AI solutions, such as machine learning models for predictive maintenance, sensor-based monitoring, computer vision, and automated safety interventions, and specific areas where AI solutions are missed and can be developed to reduce incidents and recovery time. Fatality reports of tractor drivers were categorized into six main categories, including run over, pinned by/ Crushed and entanglement, fall, fire, roll over, and overturn. Each category was then subcategorized based on similarities of incident causes in the reports.

Results: The application of the REDECA framework, which categorizes risk states into R1 (safe), R2 (hazard exposure), and R3 (incident), revealed potential AI solutions that could improve the safety of tractor drivers. In all categories, the REDECA framework lacks AI solutions for three elements, including the probability of reducing recovery time in R3, detecting changes between R2 and R3, and intervention to send workers to R2. Most of the categories were missing AI solutions for interventions to prevent entry to the R3 element of the REDECA. In addition, the fall, roll over, and overturn categories lacked AI intervention that minimized damage and recovery in R3.

Conclusions: The outcome of this study shows an urgent need to develop AI solutions to improve tractor driver safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信