{"title":"混合型导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤在影像学上显示胰腺主管病变的频率是多少?","authors":"Kosuke Takahashi, Ichiro Yasuda, Toshiki Entani, Iori Motoo, Nobuhiko Hayashi, Takayuki Ando, Haruka Fujinami, Kazuto Tajiri, Johji Imura, Kenichi Hirabayashi, Eisuke Ozawa, Hisamitsu Miyaaki, Kazuhiko Nakao","doi":"10.1111/den.15051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>A pancreatic cyst >5 mm in diameter that communicates with the dilated main pancreatic duct (MPD) ≥5 mm on imaging is defined as mixed type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (MX-IPMN). However, the frequency of tumor involvement of the MPD in MX-IPMN remains unknown. This study investigated how often MX-IPMNs involve the MPD and whether MPD involvement can be diagnosed by peroral pancreatoscopy (POPS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent POPS for MX-IPMN followed by surgical resection between July 2018 and December 2021. The pathological features of MX-IPMN, including tumor extension to the MPD, were analyzed. Additionally, the diagnostic performance of various imaging modalities in detecting tumor extension to the MPD was evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among a total of 15 patients, 10 (67%) had pathologically confirmed tumor extension to the MPD. In most cases with pathologically confirmed MPD involvement, the main tumor was diagnosed as high-grade dysplasia (60%) or invasive carcinoma (10%). Conversely, low-grade dysplasia was the main lesion in most cases without MPD involvement (low-grade dysplasia 80%; high-grade dysplasia 20%, invasive carcinoma 0%). The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of POPS with or without biopsy was 93.3%, 90.0%, and 100%, respectively. POPS demonstrated higher accuracy and sensitivity than computed tomography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic ultrasonography (accuracy: 93.3%, 40%, 60%, and 80%; sensitivity: 93.3%, 10%, 40%, and 70%, respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 67% of MX-IPMNs had pathologically proven MPD involvement. Tumor extension to the MPD is highly suspicious of malignancy, and POPS may be useful for evaluating MPD involvement.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":159,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Endoscopy","volume":"37 9","pages":"972-980"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How often does a mixed type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm on imaging indicate pathological involvement of the main pancreatic duct?\",\"authors\":\"Kosuke Takahashi, Ichiro Yasuda, Toshiki Entani, Iori Motoo, Nobuhiko Hayashi, Takayuki Ando, Haruka Fujinami, Kazuto Tajiri, Johji Imura, Kenichi Hirabayashi, Eisuke Ozawa, Hisamitsu Miyaaki, Kazuhiko Nakao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/den.15051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>A pancreatic cyst >5 mm in diameter that communicates with the dilated main pancreatic duct (MPD) ≥5 mm on imaging is defined as mixed type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (MX-IPMN). However, the frequency of tumor involvement of the MPD in MX-IPMN remains unknown. This study investigated how often MX-IPMNs involve the MPD and whether MPD involvement can be diagnosed by peroral pancreatoscopy (POPS).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent POPS for MX-IPMN followed by surgical resection between July 2018 and December 2021. The pathological features of MX-IPMN, including tumor extension to the MPD, were analyzed. Additionally, the diagnostic performance of various imaging modalities in detecting tumor extension to the MPD was evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among a total of 15 patients, 10 (67%) had pathologically confirmed tumor extension to the MPD. In most cases with pathologically confirmed MPD involvement, the main tumor was diagnosed as high-grade dysplasia (60%) or invasive carcinoma (10%). Conversely, low-grade dysplasia was the main lesion in most cases without MPD involvement (low-grade dysplasia 80%; high-grade dysplasia 20%, invasive carcinoma 0%). The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of POPS with or without biopsy was 93.3%, 90.0%, and 100%, respectively. POPS demonstrated higher accuracy and sensitivity than computed tomography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic ultrasonography (accuracy: 93.3%, 40%, 60%, and 80%; sensitivity: 93.3%, 10%, 40%, and 70%, respectively).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall, 67% of MX-IPMNs had pathologically proven MPD involvement. Tumor extension to the MPD is highly suspicious of malignancy, and POPS may be useful for evaluating MPD involvement.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"37 9\",\"pages\":\"972-980\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.15051\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.15051","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
How often does a mixed type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm on imaging indicate pathological involvement of the main pancreatic duct?
Objectives
A pancreatic cyst >5 mm in diameter that communicates with the dilated main pancreatic duct (MPD) ≥5 mm on imaging is defined as mixed type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (MX-IPMN). However, the frequency of tumor involvement of the MPD in MX-IPMN remains unknown. This study investigated how often MX-IPMNs involve the MPD and whether MPD involvement can be diagnosed by peroral pancreatoscopy (POPS).
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent POPS for MX-IPMN followed by surgical resection between July 2018 and December 2021. The pathological features of MX-IPMN, including tumor extension to the MPD, were analyzed. Additionally, the diagnostic performance of various imaging modalities in detecting tumor extension to the MPD was evaluated.
Results
Among a total of 15 patients, 10 (67%) had pathologically confirmed tumor extension to the MPD. In most cases with pathologically confirmed MPD involvement, the main tumor was diagnosed as high-grade dysplasia (60%) or invasive carcinoma (10%). Conversely, low-grade dysplasia was the main lesion in most cases without MPD involvement (low-grade dysplasia 80%; high-grade dysplasia 20%, invasive carcinoma 0%). The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of POPS with or without biopsy was 93.3%, 90.0%, and 100%, respectively. POPS demonstrated higher accuracy and sensitivity than computed tomography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic ultrasonography (accuracy: 93.3%, 40%, 60%, and 80%; sensitivity: 93.3%, 10%, 40%, and 70%, respectively).
Conclusions
Overall, 67% of MX-IPMNs had pathologically proven MPD involvement. Tumor extension to the MPD is highly suspicious of malignancy, and POPS may be useful for evaluating MPD involvement.
期刊介绍:
Digestive Endoscopy (DEN) is the official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, the Asian Pacific Society for Digestive Endoscopy and the World Endoscopy Organization. Digestive Endoscopy serves as a medium for presenting original articles that offer significant contributions to knowledge in the broad field of endoscopy. The Journal also includes Reviews, Original Articles, How I Do It, Case Reports (only of exceptional interest and novelty are accepted), Letters, Techniques and Images, abstracts and news items that may be of interest to endoscopists.