用一种新型的临床斜视测量法评价多发性硬化症的斜视异常。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Zahra Polat, Ahmet Alperen Akbulut, Sema Satıcı, Reyhan Sürmeli, Mehmet Sürmeli
{"title":"用一种新型的临床斜视测量法评价多发性硬化症的斜视异常。","authors":"Zahra Polat, Ahmet Alperen Akbulut, Sema Satıcı, Reyhan Sürmeli, Mehmet Sürmeli","doi":"10.1159/000546670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The clinical saccadometry test is an ocular motor test that provides a functional assessment of the brain regions and circuits involved in the generation of saccadic eye movements. Clinical saccadometry is thought to be more sensitive to concussions and neurodegenerative disorders. The aim of our study was to compare healthy individuals with individuals diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) using a saccadometry test, and to evaluate pro-saccade and anti-saccade performances.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 32 patients (mean age: 41±11.88 years) between the ages of 18-60 years with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), and a healthy control group of 28 individuals (mean age: 37.3±12.2 years). Spontaneous nystagmus, gaze, random saccade, pursuit, optokinetic and saccadometry tests included in the videonystagmography (VNG) test battery were performed for all participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in random saccade (RS) latencies between the groups (p>0.05). However, the pro-saccade and anti-saccade latencies were significantly prolonged in the multiple sclerosis (MS) group (p<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in peak velocity and accuracy for random saccades, pro-saccades and anti-saccades (p>0.05). Directional error rates in the pro-saccade and anti-saccade tests were significantly different between the MS and control groups (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of our study show that there are significant differences in saccadometry test results between MS patients and healthy subjects. Therefore, the clinical saccadometry test, which is newly added to the VNG test battery and offers short and non-invasive evaluation, could be included in the vestibular test battery for neurodegenerative diseases such as MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUATION OF SACCADIC ABNORMALITIES IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS USING A NOVEL CLINICAL SACCADOMETRY TEST.\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Polat, Ahmet Alperen Akbulut, Sema Satıcı, Reyhan Sürmeli, Mehmet Sürmeli\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000546670\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The clinical saccadometry test is an ocular motor test that provides a functional assessment of the brain regions and circuits involved in the generation of saccadic eye movements. Clinical saccadometry is thought to be more sensitive to concussions and neurodegenerative disorders. The aim of our study was to compare healthy individuals with individuals diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) using a saccadometry test, and to evaluate pro-saccade and anti-saccade performances.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 32 patients (mean age: 41±11.88 years) between the ages of 18-60 years with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), and a healthy control group of 28 individuals (mean age: 37.3±12.2 years). Spontaneous nystagmus, gaze, random saccade, pursuit, optokinetic and saccadometry tests included in the videonystagmography (VNG) test battery were performed for all participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in random saccade (RS) latencies between the groups (p>0.05). However, the pro-saccade and anti-saccade latencies were significantly prolonged in the multiple sclerosis (MS) group (p<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in peak velocity and accuracy for random saccades, pro-saccades and anti-saccades (p>0.05). Directional error rates in the pro-saccade and anti-saccade tests were significantly different between the MS and control groups (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of our study show that there are significant differences in saccadometry test results between MS patients and healthy subjects. Therefore, the clinical saccadometry test, which is newly added to the VNG test battery and offers short and non-invasive evaluation, could be included in the vestibular test battery for neurodegenerative diseases such as MS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Audiology and Neuro-Otology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Audiology and Neuro-Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546670\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546670","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:临床眼动测试是一种眼运动测试,它提供了与眼动产生有关的大脑区域和回路的功能评估。临床测量被认为对脑震荡和神经退行性疾病更敏感。本研究的目的是比较健康人与诊断为复发-缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)的个体,并评估前扫视和抗扫视的表现。方法:研究纳入32例18-60岁复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者(平均年龄41±11.88岁)和28例健康对照组(平均年龄37.3±12.2岁)。对所有参与者进行自发性眼球震颤、凝视、随机扫视、追逐、视动力学和眼球测量测试,包括视频眼球震颤(VNG)测试电池。结果:两组间随机扫视潜伏期差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。而多发性硬化症(MS)组的前扫视和抗扫视潜伏期明显延长(p0.05)。在扫视前和反扫视试验中,MS组和对照组的方向错误率有显著差异(p)结论:我们的研究结果表明,MS患者的扫视测量结果与健康受试者之间存在显著差异。因此,对于MS等神经退行性疾病,可将新加入VNG测试组,且评估时间短、无创的临床测囊术测试纳入前庭测试组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EVALUATION OF SACCADIC ABNORMALITIES IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS USING A NOVEL CLINICAL SACCADOMETRY TEST.

Introduction: The clinical saccadometry test is an ocular motor test that provides a functional assessment of the brain regions and circuits involved in the generation of saccadic eye movements. Clinical saccadometry is thought to be more sensitive to concussions and neurodegenerative disorders. The aim of our study was to compare healthy individuals with individuals diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) using a saccadometry test, and to evaluate pro-saccade and anti-saccade performances.

Methods: The study included 32 patients (mean age: 41±11.88 years) between the ages of 18-60 years with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), and a healthy control group of 28 individuals (mean age: 37.3±12.2 years). Spontaneous nystagmus, gaze, random saccade, pursuit, optokinetic and saccadometry tests included in the videonystagmography (VNG) test battery were performed for all participants.

Results: There were no significant differences in random saccade (RS) latencies between the groups (p>0.05). However, the pro-saccade and anti-saccade latencies were significantly prolonged in the multiple sclerosis (MS) group (p<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in peak velocity and accuracy for random saccades, pro-saccades and anti-saccades (p>0.05). Directional error rates in the pro-saccade and anti-saccade tests were significantly different between the MS and control groups (p<0.05).

Conclusion: The findings of our study show that there are significant differences in saccadometry test results between MS patients and healthy subjects. Therefore, the clinical saccadometry test, which is newly added to the VNG test battery and offers short and non-invasive evaluation, could be included in the vestibular test battery for neurodegenerative diseases such as MS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Audiology and Neuro-Otology
Audiology and Neuro-Otology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Audiology and Neurotology'' provides a forum for the publication of the most-advanced and rigorous scientific research related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal seeks submission of cutting edge research opening up new and innovative fields of study that may improve our understanding and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems, their central connections and their perception in the central nervous system. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信