干预过度使用在儿科护理在澳大利亚大都市全科医生。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tammy Meyers Morris, Lena Sanci, Alannah Rudkin, Cecilia Moore, Kim Dalziel, Siaw-Teng Liaw, Brendan Goodger, Gary Freed, Karen Wheeler, Stephanie Germano, Jane Le, Sonia Khano, Michael Hodgins, Harriet Hiscock, Raghu Lingam
{"title":"干预过度使用在儿科护理在澳大利亚大都市全科医生。","authors":"Tammy Meyers Morris, Lena Sanci, Alannah Rudkin, Cecilia Moore, Kim Dalziel, Siaw-Teng Liaw, Brendan Goodger, Gary Freed, Karen Wheeler, Stephanie Germano, Jane Le, Sonia Khano, Michael Hodgins, Harriet Hiscock, Raghu Lingam","doi":"10.31128/AJGP-09-24-7399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>General practitioner (GP)-provided low-value paediatric primary care (LVC)/intervention overuse is not routinely evaluated. The aim of this paper is to evaluate prevalence, associated GP characteristics and cost of GP-provided LVC for five common paediatric conditions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patient-level data were extracted from 22 practices in Sydney and Melbourne. GPs were surveyed and costs of LVC were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LVC was provided in 628/6182 (10.2%) consultations, including antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections (511/4469, 11.4%). GPs practising for >15 years demonstrated increased risk of providing LVC (risk difference [RD] 9.8 %; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.0 to 15.6), and LVC occurred less at private versus bulk billing practices (RD 7.2 %; 95% CI: 2.9 to 11.5) and with female versus male GPs (RD -4.5%; 95% CI: -8.7 to -0.4). Estimated LVC cost was $17,254.15, extrapolated to $41.2 million when applied to all Australian LVC paediatric visits.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Low-level intervention overuse continues among urban GPs. Targeted quality improvement approaches addressing associated GP characteristics might strengthen paediatric care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54241,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of General Practice","volume":"54 6","pages":"378-386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intervention overuse in paediatric care in Australian metropolitan general practice.\",\"authors\":\"Tammy Meyers Morris, Lena Sanci, Alannah Rudkin, Cecilia Moore, Kim Dalziel, Siaw-Teng Liaw, Brendan Goodger, Gary Freed, Karen Wheeler, Stephanie Germano, Jane Le, Sonia Khano, Michael Hodgins, Harriet Hiscock, Raghu Lingam\",\"doi\":\"10.31128/AJGP-09-24-7399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>General practitioner (GP)-provided low-value paediatric primary care (LVC)/intervention overuse is not routinely evaluated. The aim of this paper is to evaluate prevalence, associated GP characteristics and cost of GP-provided LVC for five common paediatric conditions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patient-level data were extracted from 22 practices in Sydney and Melbourne. GPs were surveyed and costs of LVC were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LVC was provided in 628/6182 (10.2%) consultations, including antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections (511/4469, 11.4%). GPs practising for >15 years demonstrated increased risk of providing LVC (risk difference [RD] 9.8 %; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.0 to 15.6), and LVC occurred less at private versus bulk billing practices (RD 7.2 %; 95% CI: 2.9 to 11.5) and with female versus male GPs (RD -4.5%; 95% CI: -8.7 to -0.4). Estimated LVC cost was $17,254.15, extrapolated to $41.2 million when applied to all Australian LVC paediatric visits.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Low-level intervention overuse continues among urban GPs. Targeted quality improvement approaches addressing associated GP characteristics might strengthen paediatric care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\"54 6\",\"pages\":\"378-386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-09-24-7399\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-09-24-7399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:全科医生(GP)提供的低价值儿科初级保健(LVC)/干预过度使用没有常规评估。本文的目的是评估患病率,相关的GP特征和GP提供的LVC治疗五种常见儿科疾病的成本。方法:从悉尼和墨尔本的22家诊所中提取患者水平的数据。对全科医生进行调查,评估LVC的成本。结果:628/6182(10.2%)就诊患者使用了LVC,其中上呼吸道感染患者使用了抗生素(511/4469,11.4%)。执业15年的全科医生显示出提供LVC的风险增加(风险差[RD] 9.8%;95%置信区间[CI]: 4.0至15.6),与批量计费相比,私人计费的LVC发生率更低(RD为7.2%;95% CI: 2.9 - 11.5),女性gp与男性gp (RD -4.5%;95% CI: -8.7 ~ -0.4)。估计LVC费用为17,254.15美元,如果应用于所有澳大利亚LVC儿科就诊,则推断为4120万美元。讨论:低水平干预过度使用在城市全科医生中继续存在。针对相关全科医生特征的有针对性的质量改进方法可能会加强儿科护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intervention overuse in paediatric care in Australian metropolitan general practice.

Background and objectives: General practitioner (GP)-provided low-value paediatric primary care (LVC)/intervention overuse is not routinely evaluated. The aim of this paper is to evaluate prevalence, associated GP characteristics and cost of GP-provided LVC for five common paediatric conditions.

Method: Patient-level data were extracted from 22 practices in Sydney and Melbourne. GPs were surveyed and costs of LVC were evaluated.

Results: LVC was provided in 628/6182 (10.2%) consultations, including antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections (511/4469, 11.4%). GPs practising for >15 years demonstrated increased risk of providing LVC (risk difference [RD] 9.8 %; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.0 to 15.6), and LVC occurred less at private versus bulk billing practices (RD 7.2 %; 95% CI: 2.9 to 11.5) and with female versus male GPs (RD -4.5%; 95% CI: -8.7 to -0.4). Estimated LVC cost was $17,254.15, extrapolated to $41.2 million when applied to all Australian LVC paediatric visits.

Discussion: Low-level intervention overuse continues among urban GPs. Targeted quality improvement approaches addressing associated GP characteristics might strengthen paediatric care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of General Practice
Australian Journal of General Practice Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
284
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of General Practice (AJGP) aims to provide relevant, evidence-based, clearly articulated information to Australian general practitioners (GPs) to assist them in providing the highest quality patient care, applicable to the varied geographic and social contexts in which GPs work and to all GP roles as clinician, researcher, educator, practice team member and opinion leader. All articles are subject to peer review before they are accepted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信