Tammy Meyers Morris, Lena Sanci, Alannah Rudkin, Cecilia Moore, Kim Dalziel, Siaw-Teng Liaw, Brendan Goodger, Gary Freed, Karen Wheeler, Stephanie Germano, Jane Le, Sonia Khano, Michael Hodgins, Harriet Hiscock, Raghu Lingam
{"title":"干预过度使用在儿科护理在澳大利亚大都市全科医生。","authors":"Tammy Meyers Morris, Lena Sanci, Alannah Rudkin, Cecilia Moore, Kim Dalziel, Siaw-Teng Liaw, Brendan Goodger, Gary Freed, Karen Wheeler, Stephanie Germano, Jane Le, Sonia Khano, Michael Hodgins, Harriet Hiscock, Raghu Lingam","doi":"10.31128/AJGP-09-24-7399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>General practitioner (GP)-provided low-value paediatric primary care (LVC)/intervention overuse is not routinely evaluated. The aim of this paper is to evaluate prevalence, associated GP characteristics and cost of GP-provided LVC for five common paediatric conditions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patient-level data were extracted from 22 practices in Sydney and Melbourne. GPs were surveyed and costs of LVC were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LVC was provided in 628/6182 (10.2%) consultations, including antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections (511/4469, 11.4%). GPs practising for >15 years demonstrated increased risk of providing LVC (risk difference [RD] 9.8 %; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.0 to 15.6), and LVC occurred less at private versus bulk billing practices (RD 7.2 %; 95% CI: 2.9 to 11.5) and with female versus male GPs (RD -4.5%; 95% CI: -8.7 to -0.4). Estimated LVC cost was $17,254.15, extrapolated to $41.2 million when applied to all Australian LVC paediatric visits.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Low-level intervention overuse continues among urban GPs. Targeted quality improvement approaches addressing associated GP characteristics might strengthen paediatric care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54241,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of General Practice","volume":"54 6","pages":"378-386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intervention overuse in paediatric care in Australian metropolitan general practice.\",\"authors\":\"Tammy Meyers Morris, Lena Sanci, Alannah Rudkin, Cecilia Moore, Kim Dalziel, Siaw-Teng Liaw, Brendan Goodger, Gary Freed, Karen Wheeler, Stephanie Germano, Jane Le, Sonia Khano, Michael Hodgins, Harriet Hiscock, Raghu Lingam\",\"doi\":\"10.31128/AJGP-09-24-7399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>General practitioner (GP)-provided low-value paediatric primary care (LVC)/intervention overuse is not routinely evaluated. The aim of this paper is to evaluate prevalence, associated GP characteristics and cost of GP-provided LVC for five common paediatric conditions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patient-level data were extracted from 22 practices in Sydney and Melbourne. GPs were surveyed and costs of LVC were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LVC was provided in 628/6182 (10.2%) consultations, including antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections (511/4469, 11.4%). GPs practising for >15 years demonstrated increased risk of providing LVC (risk difference [RD] 9.8 %; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.0 to 15.6), and LVC occurred less at private versus bulk billing practices (RD 7.2 %; 95% CI: 2.9 to 11.5) and with female versus male GPs (RD -4.5%; 95% CI: -8.7 to -0.4). Estimated LVC cost was $17,254.15, extrapolated to $41.2 million when applied to all Australian LVC paediatric visits.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Low-level intervention overuse continues among urban GPs. Targeted quality improvement approaches addressing associated GP characteristics might strengthen paediatric care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\"54 6\",\"pages\":\"378-386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-09-24-7399\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-09-24-7399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intervention overuse in paediatric care in Australian metropolitan general practice.
Background and objectives: General practitioner (GP)-provided low-value paediatric primary care (LVC)/intervention overuse is not routinely evaluated. The aim of this paper is to evaluate prevalence, associated GP characteristics and cost of GP-provided LVC for five common paediatric conditions.
Method: Patient-level data were extracted from 22 practices in Sydney and Melbourne. GPs were surveyed and costs of LVC were evaluated.
Results: LVC was provided in 628/6182 (10.2%) consultations, including antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections (511/4469, 11.4%). GPs practising for >15 years demonstrated increased risk of providing LVC (risk difference [RD] 9.8 %; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.0 to 15.6), and LVC occurred less at private versus bulk billing practices (RD 7.2 %; 95% CI: 2.9 to 11.5) and with female versus male GPs (RD -4.5%; 95% CI: -8.7 to -0.4). Estimated LVC cost was $17,254.15, extrapolated to $41.2 million when applied to all Australian LVC paediatric visits.
Discussion: Low-level intervention overuse continues among urban GPs. Targeted quality improvement approaches addressing associated GP characteristics might strengthen paediatric care.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of General Practice (AJGP) aims to provide relevant, evidence-based, clearly articulated information to Australian general practitioners (GPs) to assist them in providing the highest quality patient care, applicable to the varied geographic and social contexts in which GPs work and to all GP roles as clinician, researcher, educator, practice team member and opinion leader. All articles are subject to peer review before they are accepted for publication.