Ming Liang , Shiji Wu , Bing Ou , Jiayi Wu , Haolin Qiu , Xinbao Zhao , Baoming Luo
{"title":"鉴别透明细胞和非透明细胞肾细胞癌:使用对比增强超声放射组学的机器学习方法。","authors":"Ming Liang , Shiji Wu , Bing Ou , Jiayi Wu , Haolin Qiu , Xinbao Zhao , Baoming Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.05.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this investigation is to assess the clinical usefulness of a machine learning model using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) radiomics in discriminating clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from non-ccRCC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 292 patients with pathologically confirmed RCC subtypes underwent CEUS (development set. <em>n</em> = 231; validation set, <em>n</em> = 61) in a retrospective study. Radiomics features were derived from CEUS images acquired during the cortical and parenchymal phases. Radiomics models were developed using logistic regression (LR), support vector machine, decision tree, naive Bayes, gradient boosting machine, and random forest. The suitable model was identified based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Appropriate clinical CEUS features were identified through univariate and multivariate LR analyses to develop a clinical model. By integrating radiomics and clinical CEUS features, a combined model was established. A comprehensive evaluation of the models’ performance was conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After the reduction and selection process were applied to 2250 radiomics features, the final set of 8 features was considered valuable. Among the models, the LR model had the highest performance on the validation set and showed good robustness. In both the development and validation sets, both the radiomics (AUC, 0.946 and 0.927) and the combined models (AUC, 0.949 and 0.925) outperformed the clinical model (AUC, 0.851 and 0.768), showing higher AUC values (all <em>p</em> < 0.05). The combined model exhibited favorable calibration and clinical benefit.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The combined model integrating clinical CEUS and CEUS radiomics features demonstrated good diagnostic performance in discriminating ccRCC from non-ccRCC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":"51 8","pages":"Pages 1361-1369"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discriminating Clear Cell From Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Machine Learning Approach Using Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Radiomics\",\"authors\":\"Ming Liang , Shiji Wu , Bing Ou , Jiayi Wu , Haolin Qiu , Xinbao Zhao , Baoming Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2025.05.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this investigation is to assess the clinical usefulness of a machine learning model using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) radiomics in discriminating clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from non-ccRCC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 292 patients with pathologically confirmed RCC subtypes underwent CEUS (development set. <em>n</em> = 231; validation set, <em>n</em> = 61) in a retrospective study. Radiomics features were derived from CEUS images acquired during the cortical and parenchymal phases. Radiomics models were developed using logistic regression (LR), support vector machine, decision tree, naive Bayes, gradient boosting machine, and random forest. The suitable model was identified based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Appropriate clinical CEUS features were identified through univariate and multivariate LR analyses to develop a clinical model. By integrating radiomics and clinical CEUS features, a combined model was established. A comprehensive evaluation of the models’ performance was conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After the reduction and selection process were applied to 2250 radiomics features, the final set of 8 features was considered valuable. Among the models, the LR model had the highest performance on the validation set and showed good robustness. In both the development and validation sets, both the radiomics (AUC, 0.946 and 0.927) and the combined models (AUC, 0.949 and 0.925) outperformed the clinical model (AUC, 0.851 and 0.768), showing higher AUC values (all <em>p</em> < 0.05). The combined model exhibited favorable calibration and clinical benefit.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The combined model integrating clinical CEUS and CEUS radiomics features demonstrated good diagnostic performance in discriminating ccRCC from non-ccRCC.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"51 8\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1361-1369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562925001577\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562925001577","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Discriminating Clear Cell From Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Machine Learning Approach Using Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound Radiomics
Objective
The aim of this investigation is to assess the clinical usefulness of a machine learning model using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) radiomics in discriminating clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) from non-ccRCC.
Methods
A total of 292 patients with pathologically confirmed RCC subtypes underwent CEUS (development set. n = 231; validation set, n = 61) in a retrospective study. Radiomics features were derived from CEUS images acquired during the cortical and parenchymal phases. Radiomics models were developed using logistic regression (LR), support vector machine, decision tree, naive Bayes, gradient boosting machine, and random forest. The suitable model was identified based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Appropriate clinical CEUS features were identified through univariate and multivariate LR analyses to develop a clinical model. By integrating radiomics and clinical CEUS features, a combined model was established. A comprehensive evaluation of the models’ performance was conducted.
Results
After the reduction and selection process were applied to 2250 radiomics features, the final set of 8 features was considered valuable. Among the models, the LR model had the highest performance on the validation set and showed good robustness. In both the development and validation sets, both the radiomics (AUC, 0.946 and 0.927) and the combined models (AUC, 0.949 and 0.925) outperformed the clinical model (AUC, 0.851 and 0.768), showing higher AUC values (all p < 0.05). The combined model exhibited favorable calibration and clinical benefit.
Conclusion
The combined model integrating clinical CEUS and CEUS radiomics features demonstrated good diagnostic performance in discriminating ccRCC from non-ccRCC.
期刊介绍:
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.