逆境、创伤症状和澳大利亚个体化发展创伤干预计划的有效性。

IF 1.7 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma Pub Date : 2025-01-16 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1007/s40653-024-00674-x
Pamela Smith, Sonia Sharmin, Dallas Ambry, Allison Cox, Erin Hambrick, Margarita Frederico, Holly Mosse
{"title":"逆境、创伤症状和澳大利亚个体化发展创伤干预计划的有效性。","authors":"Pamela Smith, Sonia Sharmin, Dallas Ambry, Allison Cox, Erin Hambrick, Margarita Frederico, Holly Mosse","doi":"10.1007/s40653-024-00674-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the effectiveness of a therapeutic intervention program Take Two; designed to address developmental trauma experienced by Child Protection clients in Victoria, Australia. Replicating a 2010 evaluation study of the program, we utilised a Time 1-Time 2 design to identify the impact of tailored Take Two treatments informed by the Neurosequential Model of Therapeutics' (NMT™). Change in the overall sample was measured by the Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children (TSCC; ages 8-16 years) and Trauma Symptom Checklist for Young Children (TSCYC; ages 3-12 years). In addition, a sub-cohort of children with severe adverse infant experiences was identified using a developmental history of adversity tool; Part A of the Neurosequential Network's Neurosequential Model of Therapeutics (NMT™) Metric. Treatment effects were also evaluated to determine the extent to which this potentially more vulnerable subgroup was improving. Significant improvement was found in the TSCC cohort (8-16 years) with effect sizes ranging from small to medium (<i>d</i> = 0.23-0.54) on TSCC sub-scales. The largest effects were found on Anxiety (0.54), which moved from sub-clinical to non-clinical. The TSCYC cohort (3-12 years) showed significant symptom reduction on all trauma scales with medium sized effects (<i>d</i> = 0.44-0.53), and the largest effect on Posttraumatic Stress-Total (0.53). In the sub-cohort experiencing moderate-to-severe adversity in infancy, effect sizes were small to medium (<i>d</i> = 0.15-0.59). Take Two interventions were associated with significantly reduced trauma symptoms even when children's adverse experiences in infancy were moderate to severe, highlighting the benefits of NMT™ guided systemic and individually tailored therapeutic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":44763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma","volume":"18 2","pages":"481-495"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12130391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adversity, Trauma Symptoms and the Effectiveness of an Australian Individualised Developmental Trauma Intervention Program.\",\"authors\":\"Pamela Smith, Sonia Sharmin, Dallas Ambry, Allison Cox, Erin Hambrick, Margarita Frederico, Holly Mosse\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40653-024-00674-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated the effectiveness of a therapeutic intervention program Take Two; designed to address developmental trauma experienced by Child Protection clients in Victoria, Australia. Replicating a 2010 evaluation study of the program, we utilised a Time 1-Time 2 design to identify the impact of tailored Take Two treatments informed by the Neurosequential Model of Therapeutics' (NMT™). Change in the overall sample was measured by the Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children (TSCC; ages 8-16 years) and Trauma Symptom Checklist for Young Children (TSCYC; ages 3-12 years). In addition, a sub-cohort of children with severe adverse infant experiences was identified using a developmental history of adversity tool; Part A of the Neurosequential Network's Neurosequential Model of Therapeutics (NMT™) Metric. Treatment effects were also evaluated to determine the extent to which this potentially more vulnerable subgroup was improving. Significant improvement was found in the TSCC cohort (8-16 years) with effect sizes ranging from small to medium (<i>d</i> = 0.23-0.54) on TSCC sub-scales. The largest effects were found on Anxiety (0.54), which moved from sub-clinical to non-clinical. The TSCYC cohort (3-12 years) showed significant symptom reduction on all trauma scales with medium sized effects (<i>d</i> = 0.44-0.53), and the largest effect on Posttraumatic Stress-Total (0.53). In the sub-cohort experiencing moderate-to-severe adversity in infancy, effect sizes were small to medium (<i>d</i> = 0.15-0.59). Take Two interventions were associated with significantly reduced trauma symptoms even when children's adverse experiences in infancy were moderate to severe, highlighting the benefits of NMT™ guided systemic and individually tailored therapeutic interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"481-495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12130391/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-024-00674-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-024-00674-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究评估了治疗干预方案的有效性。旨在解决澳大利亚维多利亚州儿童保护客户所经历的发展创伤。我们复制了2010年对该项目的评估研究,利用Time 1-Time 2设计来确定根据神经序列治疗模型(NMT™)定制的Take Two治疗的影响。总体样本的变化通过儿童创伤症状检查表(TSCC;幼儿创伤症状检查表(TSCYC;3-12岁)。此外,使用逆境发展史工具确定了具有严重不良婴儿经历的儿童亚队列;神经序列网络的神经序列治疗模型(NMT™)度量的A部分。还对治疗效果进行了评估,以确定这个可能更脆弱的亚群的改善程度。在TSCC子量表上,TSCC队列(8-16年)的效应量从小到中等(d = 0.23-0.54),有显著改善。影响最大的是焦虑(0.54),从亚临床转变为非临床。TSCYC队列(3-12岁)在所有创伤量表上均表现出显著的症状减轻,具有中等大小的影响(d = 0.44-0.53),对创伤后应激-总压力(0.53)的影响最大。在婴儿期经历中度至重度逆境的亚队列中,效应量为小到中等(d = 0.15-0.59)。两种干预措施与显著减少创伤症状相关,即使儿童在婴儿期的不良经历是中度至重度,这突出了NMT™指导的系统性和个性化治疗干预措施的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adversity, Trauma Symptoms and the Effectiveness of an Australian Individualised Developmental Trauma Intervention Program.

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a therapeutic intervention program Take Two; designed to address developmental trauma experienced by Child Protection clients in Victoria, Australia. Replicating a 2010 evaluation study of the program, we utilised a Time 1-Time 2 design to identify the impact of tailored Take Two treatments informed by the Neurosequential Model of Therapeutics' (NMT™). Change in the overall sample was measured by the Trauma Symptom Checklist for Children (TSCC; ages 8-16 years) and Trauma Symptom Checklist for Young Children (TSCYC; ages 3-12 years). In addition, a sub-cohort of children with severe adverse infant experiences was identified using a developmental history of adversity tool; Part A of the Neurosequential Network's Neurosequential Model of Therapeutics (NMT™) Metric. Treatment effects were also evaluated to determine the extent to which this potentially more vulnerable subgroup was improving. Significant improvement was found in the TSCC cohort (8-16 years) with effect sizes ranging from small to medium (d = 0.23-0.54) on TSCC sub-scales. The largest effects were found on Anxiety (0.54), which moved from sub-clinical to non-clinical. The TSCYC cohort (3-12 years) showed significant symptom reduction on all trauma scales with medium sized effects (d = 0.44-0.53), and the largest effect on Posttraumatic Stress-Total (0.53). In the sub-cohort experiencing moderate-to-severe adversity in infancy, effect sizes were small to medium (d = 0.15-0.59). Take Two interventions were associated with significantly reduced trauma symptoms even when children's adverse experiences in infancy were moderate to severe, highlighting the benefits of NMT™ guided systemic and individually tailored therapeutic interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Underpinned by a biopsychosocial approach, the Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma presents original research and prevention and treatment strategies for understanding and dealing with symptoms and disorders related to the psychological effects of trauma experienced by children and adolescents during childhood and where the impact of these experiences continues into adulthood. The journal also examines intervention models directed toward the individual, family, and community, new theoretical models and approaches, and public policy proposals and innovations. In addition, the journal promotes rigorous investigation and debate on the human capacity for agency, resilience and longer-term healing in the face of child and adolescent trauma. With a multidisciplinary approach that draws input from the psychological, medical, social work, sociological, public health, legal and education fields, the journal features research, intervention approaches and evidence-based programs, theoretical articles, specific review articles, brief reports and case studies, and commentaries on current and/or controversial topics. The journal also encourages submissions from less heard voices, for example in terms of geography, minority status or service user perspectives. Among the topics examined in the Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma: The effects of childhood maltreatment Loss, natural disasters, and political conflict Exposure to or victimization from family or community violence Racial, ethnic, gender, sexual orientation or class discrimination Physical injury, diseases, and painful or debilitating medical treatments The impact of poverty, social deprivation and inequality Barriers and facilitators on pathways to recovery The Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma is an important resource for practitioners, policymakers, researchers, and academics whose work is centered on children exposed to traumatic events and adults exposed to traumatic events as children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信