墨西哥卫生工作者的劳动不稳定性:一个被忽视的问题浮出水面。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Gustavo Nigenda, Edson Serván-Mori, Patricia Aristizabal, Rosa Amarilis Zárate-Grajales, Germán Fajardo-Dolci, Rafael Lozano
{"title":"墨西哥卫生工作者的劳动不稳定性:一个被忽视的问题浮出水面。","authors":"Gustavo Nigenda, Edson Serván-Mori, Patricia Aristizabal, Rosa Amarilis Zárate-Grajales, Germán Fajardo-Dolci, Rafael Lozano","doi":"10.1186/s12960-025-00975-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little attention has been paid to quantifying job precariousness among health workers in low- and middle-income countries. Analytical models of human resources for health omit work precarity as a relevant phenomenon. However, analysing job precariousness is critical to improving health systems' performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed pooled cross-sectional population-based data from Mexico's National Occupation and Employment Survey for 31,394 physicians and nurses between 2005 and 2022, representing almost 7, 8 million nationally throughout the study period. We used a pooled state and year fixed-effects multiple logistic regression to estimate the likelihood of having precarious employment for each survey year in both groups and according to the private/public employment sector. We conducted post hoc comparisons of quintiles of changes (2005-2022) in the adjusted percentage of labour precariousness according to the employment sector and of the private-public labour precariousness gap by state.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There was sustained growth in labour precariousness (from 58.7 and 49.0% in 2005 to 75.5% and 67.3% in 2022 among physicians and nurses, respectively). In both groups of professionals, labour precariousness was steadily higher in the private sector. However, the private-public gap narrowed to a greater extent and more accelerated among physicians than among nurses. The reduction in the private-public precariousness gap was not territorially random either (range - 39.5% to - 46.9%), with higher levels of convergence between both labour sectors, especially in the poorest socioeconomic regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The differences in the nursing and medical labour market composition have exposed the latter to the growth of precariousness due to their historical link with the private sector. The closing of the gap between public and private is a result of the recent expansion of precarious work in the latter. It is essential to develop regulatory policies to reduce precariousness and its effects on the health system applicable to both sectors.</p>","PeriodicalId":39823,"journal":{"name":"Human Resources for Health","volume":"23 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12139097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Labour precariousness in the Mexican health workforce: taking to the surface a neglected problematic issue.\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo Nigenda, Edson Serván-Mori, Patricia Aristizabal, Rosa Amarilis Zárate-Grajales, Germán Fajardo-Dolci, Rafael Lozano\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12960-025-00975-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little attention has been paid to quantifying job precariousness among health workers in low- and middle-income countries. Analytical models of human resources for health omit work precarity as a relevant phenomenon. However, analysing job precariousness is critical to improving health systems' performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed pooled cross-sectional population-based data from Mexico's National Occupation and Employment Survey for 31,394 physicians and nurses between 2005 and 2022, representing almost 7, 8 million nationally throughout the study period. We used a pooled state and year fixed-effects multiple logistic regression to estimate the likelihood of having precarious employment for each survey year in both groups and according to the private/public employment sector. We conducted post hoc comparisons of quintiles of changes (2005-2022) in the adjusted percentage of labour precariousness according to the employment sector and of the private-public labour precariousness gap by state.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There was sustained growth in labour precariousness (from 58.7 and 49.0% in 2005 to 75.5% and 67.3% in 2022 among physicians and nurses, respectively). In both groups of professionals, labour precariousness was steadily higher in the private sector. However, the private-public gap narrowed to a greater extent and more accelerated among physicians than among nurses. The reduction in the private-public precariousness gap was not territorially random either (range - 39.5% to - 46.9%), with higher levels of convergence between both labour sectors, especially in the poorest socioeconomic regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The differences in the nursing and medical labour market composition have exposed the latter to the growth of precariousness due to their historical link with the private sector. The closing of the gap between public and private is a result of the recent expansion of precarious work in the latter. It is essential to develop regulatory policies to reduce precariousness and its effects on the health system applicable to both sectors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Resources for Health\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12139097/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Resources for Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-025-00975-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resources for Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-025-00975-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对低收入和中等收入国家卫生工作者工作不稳定性的量化很少受到重视。卫生人力资源分析模型忽略了工作不稳定性这一相关现象。然而,分析工作不稳定性对于改善卫生系统的绩效至关重要。方法:我们分析了2005年至2022年间墨西哥全国职业和就业调查中31,394名医生和护士的汇总横截面人口数据,在整个研究期间,全国有近780万人。我们使用汇总的状态和年份固定效应多重逻辑回归来估计每个调查年度在两组中以及根据私营/公共就业部门出现不稳定就业的可能性。我们对就业部门调整后的劳动力不稳定性百分比和各州公私劳动力不稳定性差距的五分位数变化(2005-2022年)进行了事后比较。结果:劳动不稳定性持续增长(从2005年的58.7%和49.0%分别上升到2022年的75.5%和67.3%)。在这两组专业人士中,私营部门的劳动不稳定性稳步上升。然而,与护士相比,医生之间的公私差距缩小的程度更大,速度更快。公私不稳定差距的缩小也不是地区随机的(范围为- 39.5%至- 46.9%),两个劳动力部门之间的趋同程度更高,特别是在最贫穷的社会经济地区。结论:护理和医疗劳动力市场构成的差异使后者由于与私营部门的历史联系而面临不稳定的增长。公共部门和私营部门之间差距的缩小是私营部门不稳定工作最近扩大的结果。必须制定适用于这两个部门的监管政策,以减少不稳定性及其对卫生系统的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Labour precariousness in the Mexican health workforce: taking to the surface a neglected problematic issue.

Background: Little attention has been paid to quantifying job precariousness among health workers in low- and middle-income countries. Analytical models of human resources for health omit work precarity as a relevant phenomenon. However, analysing job precariousness is critical to improving health systems' performance.

Methods: We analysed pooled cross-sectional population-based data from Mexico's National Occupation and Employment Survey for 31,394 physicians and nurses between 2005 and 2022, representing almost 7, 8 million nationally throughout the study period. We used a pooled state and year fixed-effects multiple logistic regression to estimate the likelihood of having precarious employment for each survey year in both groups and according to the private/public employment sector. We conducted post hoc comparisons of quintiles of changes (2005-2022) in the adjusted percentage of labour precariousness according to the employment sector and of the private-public labour precariousness gap by state.

Findings: There was sustained growth in labour precariousness (from 58.7 and 49.0% in 2005 to 75.5% and 67.3% in 2022 among physicians and nurses, respectively). In both groups of professionals, labour precariousness was steadily higher in the private sector. However, the private-public gap narrowed to a greater extent and more accelerated among physicians than among nurses. The reduction in the private-public precariousness gap was not territorially random either (range - 39.5% to - 46.9%), with higher levels of convergence between both labour sectors, especially in the poorest socioeconomic regions.

Conclusions: The differences in the nursing and medical labour market composition have exposed the latter to the growth of precariousness due to their historical link with the private sector. The closing of the gap between public and private is a result of the recent expansion of precarious work in the latter. It is essential to develop regulatory policies to reduce precariousness and its effects on the health system applicable to both sectors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Resources for Health
Human Resources for Health Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
102
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Resources for Health is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal covering all aspects of planning, producing and managing the health workforce - all those who provide health services worldwide. Human Resources for Health aims to disseminate research on health workforce policy, the health labour market, health workforce practice, development of knowledge tools and implementation mechanisms nationally and internationally; as well as specific features of the health workforce, such as the impact of management of health workers" performance and its link with health outcomes. The journal encourages debate on health sector reforms and their link with human resources issues, a hitherto-neglected area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信